Diabetes and Hypertension Quality Measurement in Four Safety-Net Sites

Summary

Background: In this new era after the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009, the literature on lessons learned with electronic health record (EHR) implementation needs to be revisited.

Objectives: Our objective was to describe what implementation of a commercially available EHR with built-in quality query algorithms showed us about our care for diabetes and hypertension populations in four safety net clinics, specifically feasibility of data retrieval, measurements over time, quality of data, and how our teams used this data.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2008 to October 2012 in four safety-net clinics located in the Midwest and Western United States. A data warehouse that stores data from across the U.S was utilized for data extraction from patients with diabetes or hypertension diagnoses and at least two office visits per year. Standard quality measures were collected over a period of two to four years. All sites were engaged in a partnership model with the IT staff and a shared learning process to enhance the use of the quality metrics.

Results: While use of the algorithms was feasible across sites, challenges occurred when attempting to use the query results for research purposes. There was wide variation of both process and outcome results by individual centers. Composite calculations balanced out the differences seen in the individual measures. Despite using consistent quality definitions, the differences across centers had an impact on numerators and denominators. All sites agreed to a partnership model of EHR implementation, and each center utilized the available resources of the partnership for Center-specific quality initiatives.

Conclusions: Utilizing a shared EHR, a Regional Extension Center-like partnership model, and similar quality query algorithms allowed safety-net clinics to benchmark and improve the quality of care across differing patient populations and health care delivery models.

Citation: Benkert R, Dennehy P, White J, Hamilton A, Tanner C, Pohl JM. Diabetes and hypertension quality measurement in four safety-net sites: Lessons learned after implementation of the same commercial electronic health record. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 757–772

http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0019

Keywords

Electronic health records and systems - safety net clinic - patient with chronic illness or special needs - performance improvement

 

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.

• References

• 1 Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).. Vital signs: awareness and treatment of uncontrolled hypertension among adults—United States, 2003–2010. MMWR 2012; 61 (35) 703-709.
• 2 National Diabetes Education Program (NDEP) The Facts About Diabetes: A Leading Cause of Death in the U.S.. http://ndep.nih.gov/diabetes-facts. Accessed May 27, 2014.
• 3 National Association of Community Health Centers.. About our health centers. http://www.nachc.com about-our-health-centers.cfm. Accessed November 30, 2012.
• 4 Snow Jones A Sajid P (n.d.).. A Primer on Health Care Safety Nets. Robert Wood Johnson. http://www.rwjforg/content/dam/farm/toolkits/toolkits/2009/rwjf50923. Accessed June 1, 2014.
• 5 2012 National Healthcare Disparities Report.. June 2013. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhdr12/index.html
• 6 Baig A, Wilkes AE, Davis AM, Peek ME, Huang ES, Bell DS, Chin M. The use of quality improvement and health information technology approaches to improve diabetes outcomes in African American and Hispanic Patients. Med Care Res Rev 2010; 67 Suppl. 163S-197S.
• 7 Herrin J, da Graca B, Nicewander D, Fullerton C, Aponte P, Stanek G, Cowling T, Collinsworth A, Fleming NS, Ballard DJ. The effectiveness of implementing an electronic health record on diabetes care and outcomes. Health Serv Res 2012; 47: 1522-1540.
• 8 Wang JJ, Sebek KM, McCullough CM, Amirfar SJ, Parsons AS, Singer J, Shih SC. Sustained improvement in clinical preventive service delivery among independent primary care practices after implementing electronic health record systems. Prev Chronic Dis 2013; 10: 120341. DOI: http://dx.doi.org 10. 5888/pcd10.120341.
• 9 Davies HTO, Crombie IK. Interpreting health outcomes. J Eval Clin Prac 1997; 3: 187-199.
• 10 Kendrick DC, Bu D, Pan E, Middleton B. Crossing the evidence chasm: Building evidence bridges from process changes to clinical outcomes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 329-339.
• 11 Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, Hebert CJ. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Eng J Med 2011; 365: 825-833.
• 12 Crossman JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Cohen DJ, Clark EC, Crabtree BF. Typical electronic health record use in primary care practices and the quality of diabetes care. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10: 221-227.
• 13 Ancker JS, Singh MP, Thomas R, Edwards A, Snyder A, Kashyap A Kaushal R. Predictors of success for electronic health record implementation in small physician practices. Appl Clin Inform 2013; 4: 12-24.
• 14 Shi L, Lebrun LA, Zhu J, Hayashi AS, Sharma R, Daly CA, Sripipatana A, Ngo-Metzger Q. Clinical quality performance in U. S. health centers. Health Serv Res 2012; 47: 2225-2249.
• 15 Shih SC, McCullough CM, Wang JJ, Singer J, Parsons AS. Health information systems in small practices: Improving the delivery of clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41 (06) 603-609.
• 16 Dennehy P, White MP, Hamilton A, Pohl JM, Tanner C, Onifade TJ, Zheng K. A partnership model for implementing electronic health records in resource-limited primary care settings: experiences from two nurse managed health centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: 820-826.
• 17 Barkauskas VH, Pohl JM, Tanner C, Onifade TJM, Pilon B. Quality of care in nurse-managed health centers. Nurs Adm Q 2011; 35: 34-43.
• 18 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.. Health Resources and Services Administration. What are the key HRSA QI initiatives? Clinical quality performance measures. http://www.hrsa.gov/healthit/tool box/HealthITAdoptiontoolbox/QualityImprovement/whatarethekeyhrsaqinits.html. Accessed June 1, 2013.
• 19 American Diabetes Association (ADA).. Standards of care for diabetes (Technical Review). Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 1514-1522. Originally approved 1988. Most recent review/revision, October 2007.
• 20 Doctors Office Quality-Information Technology (DOQ- IT).. Welcome to DOQ-IT University http://www.ddcmultimedia.com/doqit Accessed October 16, 2013.
• 21 GE Healthcare.. Medical Quality Improvement Consortium. Medical Quality Improvement Consortium helps you improve the quality of care you offer your patients. http://www3.gehealthcare.com/en/ProductsCategories/Healthcare_IT/Clinical_Knowledge_Solutions/MQIC Accessed October 16, 2013.
• 22 Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services.. CMS HQI Demonstration Project. Composite Quality Score Methodology Overview. https://www.cms.gov/HospitalQualityInits/downloads/HospitalCompositeQualityScoreMethodologyOverview.pdf Accessed October 16, 2013.
• 23 Parsons A, McCullough C, Wang J, Shih S. Validity of electronic health record derived quality measurement for performance monitoring. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 604-609.
• 24 American Diabetes Association.. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes –2013. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: S11-S66.
• 25 Grossman E, Keegan T, Lessler AL, Ly MH, Huynh L, O’Malley AJ, Guadagnoli E, Landon BE. Inside the health disparities collaboratives: a detailed exploration of quality improvement at community health centers. Med Care 2008; 46: 489-496.
• 26 Landon BE, Hicks LS, O’Malley AJ, Lieu TA, Keegan T, McNeil BJ, Guadagnoli E. Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers. N Eng J Med 2007; 356: 921-934.
• 27 Pohl J, Tanner C, Pillon B, Benkert R. Comparison of nurse managed health centers with federally qualified health centers as safety net providers. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2011; 12: 90-99.
• 28 Berenson R. Seven policy recommendations to improve quality measurement. Health Affairs. http://heal-thaffairs.org/blog/2013/05/22/seven-policy-recommendations-to-improve-quality-measurement. Accessed May 22, 2013.
• 29 Hibbard JH, Cunningham PJ. How engaged are consumers in their health and health care, and why does it matter?. Res Brief 2008; (8): 1–9 http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/1019. Accessed December 4, 2008.
• 30 Coleman T. BMC Public Health. 2010:10:167 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2458/10/167 Accessed April 14, 2014.
• 31 Hung DY. Paying for prevention: associations between pay for performance and cessation counseling in primary care practices. Am J Health Prom 2012; 26: 230. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.091118-QUAN-368
• 32 Cato K, Hyun S, Bakken S. Response to a mobile health decision-support system for screening and management of tobacco use. Oncol Nurs Forum 2014; 41: 145-152. DOI: 10.1188/14. ONF.145–152.
• 33 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Primary Care, The Health Center Program.. Uniform Data System Manual. http://bphc.hrsa.gov/healthcenterdatastatistics/reporting/index.html. Accessed May 30, 2013.
• 34 Frimpong JA, Jackson BE, Stewart LM, Singh KP, Rivers PA, Bae S. Health information technology capacity at federally qualified helth centers: A mechanism for improving quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 35. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6963/13/35
• 35 Ancker JS, Kern LM, Abramson E, Kaushal R. The Triangle Model for evaluating the effect of health information technology on healthcare quality and safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 61-65.
• 36 Bodenheimer T. Strategies to Reduce Cost and Improve Care for High –Utilizing Medicaid Patients: Reflections on Pioneering Programs: A Policy Brief. Center for Health Care Strategies Inc.; October 2012.
• 37 Durand MA, Carpenter L, Dolan H, Bravo P, Mann M. et al. Do Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision-Making Reduce Health Inequalities? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2012; 9: e94670. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.009467
• 38 Stamp KD, Allen NA, Lehrer S, Zagarins SE, Welch G. Telehealth Program for Medicaid Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Lowers Hemoglobin A1c. J Manag Care Med 2013; 15: 3-10.
• 39 Dontje K, Corser W, Kreulen G, Teitelman A. A unique set of interactions: the Michigan State University (MSU) sustained partnership model of nurse practitioner primary care. J Amer Acad Nur Prac 2004; 16: 63-69.