Audiovisual Presentations on a Handheld PC Are Preferred As an Educational Tool by NICU Parents

Summary

Background Health literacy is critical for understanding complex medical problems and necessary for the well being of the patient. Printed educational materials (PM) have limitations in explaining the dynamics of a disease process. Multimedia formats may be useful for enhancing the educational process.

Objective: To evaluate whether a printed format or animation with commentary on a handheld personal computer (PC) is preferred as an educational tool by parents of a baby in the NICU.

Methods: Parents evaluated two formats: A 1-page illustrated document from the American Heart Association explaining patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and animation with commentary on a handheld PC that explained the physiology of PDA in 1 minute. The reading grade level of the PM was 8.6 versus 18.6 for the audio portion of the animated presentation. Parents viewed each format and completed a four-item questionnaire. Parents rated both formats and indicated their preference as printed, animation, or both.

Results: Forty-six parents participated in the survey. Parents preferred animation over PM (50% vs. 17.4%. p = 0.02); 39.1% expressed that the animation was excellent; whereas 4.3% expressed that the PM was excellent (p<0.001). The order of presentation of formats, sex, age, and educational level of parents did not influence the method preferred (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Parents preferred animation on a small screen handheld PC despite a much higher language level. Because handheld PCs are portable and inexpensive, they can be used effectively at the bedside with low-cost animation to enhance understanding of complex disease conditions.

Citation: Alur P, Cirelli J, Goodstein M, Bell T, Liss J. Audiovisual Presentations on a Handheld PC Are Preferred As an Educational Tool by NICU Parents. Appl Clin Inf 2010; 1: 142-148 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2010-01-RA-0005

Keywords

Health literacy - patient communication - handheld computers - patient education - PDAs Summary

 

Conflict of Interest

All authors disclose that they do not have any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that may inappropriately influence or bias the objectivity of submitted content and/or its acceptance for publication in this journal.

• References

• 1 American Heart Association [Internet].. Patent ductus arteriosus. Updated May 26, 2009. Available from: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1672
• 2 Brock TP, Smith SR. Using digital videos displayed on personal digital assistants (PDAs) to enhance patient education in clinical settings. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 76 11-12 829-835.
• 3 O’Hara DM, Seagriff-Curtin P, Levitz M, Davies D, Stock S. Using personal digital assistants to improve self-care in oral health. J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14 (Suppl. 03) 150-151.
• 4 Sevick MA, Zickmund S, Korytowski M. et al. Design, feasibility, and acceptability of an intervention using personal digital assistant-based self-monitoring in managing type 2 diabetes. Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29 (Suppl. 03) 396-409.
• 5 Fukuo W, Yoshiuchi K, Ohashi K. et al. Development of a hand-held personal digital assistant-based food diary with food photographs for Japanese subjects. J Am Diet Assn 2009; 109 (Suppl. 07) 1232-1236.
• 6 Sevick MA, Piraino B, Sereika S. et al. A preliminary study of PDA-based dietary self-monitoring in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr 2005; 15 (Suppl. 03) 304-311.
• 7 Ma Y, Olendzki BC, Chiriboga D. et al. PDA-assisted low glycemic index dietary intervention for type II diabetes: a pilot study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006; 60 (Suppl. 10) 1235-1243.
• 8 King AC, Ahn DK, Oliveira BM, Atienza AA, Castro CM, Gardner CD. Promoting physical activity through hand-held computer technology. Am J Prev Med 2008; 34 (Suppl. 02) 138-142.
• 9 Olson AL, Gaffney CA, Hedberg VA, Gladstone GR. Use of inexpensive technology to enhance adolescent health screening and counseling. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163: 172-177.
• 10 Blake H. Innovation in practice: mobile phone technology in patient care. Br J Community Nurs 2008; 13 (Suppl. 04) 160-165.
• 11 Magos A, Sharma M, Buck L. Handheld computers in clinical practice. BMJ 2004; 328 7455 1565.
• 12 Abreu DV, Tamura TK, Sipp JA, Keamy DG, Eavey RD. Podcasting: contemporary patient education. Ear Nose Throat J 2008; 87 (Suppl. 04) 208 210-211.
• 13 O’Bryant SE, Lucas JA, Willis FB, Smith GE, Graff-Radford NR, Ivnik RJ. Discrepancies between self-reported years of education and estimated reading level among elderly community-dwelling African-Americans: analysis of the MOAANS data. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2007; 22 (Suppl. 03) 327-332.