Synlett 2015; 26(11): 1567-1572
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1380869
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions of Allylic Boronic Esters with Nucleophiles: Novel Umpolung Reactivity

Phillip J. Unsworth
School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK   Email: v.aggarwal@bristol.ac.uk
,
Lorenz E. Löffler
School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK   Email: v.aggarwal@bristol.ac.uk
,
Adam Noble
School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK   Email: v.aggarwal@bristol.ac.uk
,
Varinder K. Aggarwal*
School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK   Email: v.aggarwal@bristol.ac.uk
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 23 March 2015

Accepted after revision: 07 May 2015

Publication Date:
20 May 2015 (online)


Dedicated to Professor K. Peter C. Vollhardt with deep appreciation, where science and art combine

Abstract

Oxidative palladium-catalyzed reaction conditions have been developed to allow for regioselective and stereoselective coupling of allylic boronic esters with a range of carbon-, oxygen-, and nitrogen-based nucleophiles. Studies into the mechanism of the reaction have shown that the key transmetalation step occurs with retention of stereochemistry, since overall inversion is observed.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Chinnusamy T, Feeney K, Watson CG, Leonori D, Aggarwal VK In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II . Vol. 7. Knochel P, Molander GA. Elsevier; Oxford: 2014: 692

    • For representative examples, see:
    • 2a Hoffmann RW, Zeiss H.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979; 18: 306
    • 2b Brown HC, Jadhav PK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983; 105: 2092
    • 2c Chen JL. Y, Scott HK, Hesse MJ, Willis CL, Aggarwal VK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 5316

    • For a review, see:
    • 2d Yus M, González-Gómez JC, Foubelo F. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5595

      For representative examples, see:
    • 3a Hoffmann RW, Sander T. Chem. Ber. 1990; 123: 145
    • 3b Chen JL. Y, Aggarwal VK. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 10992

    • For a review, see:
    • 3c Hatano M, Ishihara K. Synthesis 2008; 1647

      For examples of the coupling of allyltrifluoroborates, see:
    • 4a Yamamoto Y, Takada S, Miyaura N. Chem. Lett. 2006; 35: 704
    • 4b Yamamoto Y, Takada S, Miyaura N. Chem. Lett. 2006; 35: 1368
    • 4c Yamamoto Y, Takada S, Miyaura N, Iyama T, Tachikawa H. Organometallics 2008; 28: 152

    • For examples of the coupling of allylic boronic acids, see:
    • 4d Sebelius S, Olsson VJ, Wallner OA, Szabó KJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 8150

    • For examples of the coupling of allylic boronic esters, see:
    • 4e Gerbino DC, Mandolesi SD, Schmalz H, Podestá JC. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 3964
    • 4f Glasspoole BW, Ghozati K, Moir JW, Crudden CM. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 1230
    • 4g Chausset-Boissarie L, Ghozati K, LaBine E, Chen JL. Y, Aggarwal VK, Crudden CM. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 17698
    • 4h Farmer JL, Hunter HN, Organ MG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 17470
    • 4i Yang Y, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 10642
    • 5a Zhang P, Brozek LA, Morken JP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 10686
    • 5b Zhang P, Le H, Kyne RE, Morken JP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 9716
    • 5c Brozek LA, Ardolino MJ, Morken JP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 16778
    • 5d Le H, Kyne RE, Brozek LA, Morken JP. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1432
    • 5e Ardolino MJ, Morken JP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 7092
  • 6 For related processes involving the formation of π-allyl palladium complexes from allyl silanes, see: Macsári KJ, Szabó KJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 1119
  • 7 For related processes involving the formation of π-allyl palladium complexes from allyl stannanes, see: Szabó KJ. Synlett 2006; 811
    • 8a Trost BM, Van Vranken DL. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 395
    • 8b Trost BM, Crawley ML. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 2921

      For representative examples with carbon-based nucleophiles, see:
    • 9a Lin S, Song C.-X, Cai G.-X, Wang W.-H, Shi Z.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 12901
    • 9b Young AJ, White MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 14090
    • 9c Young AJ, White MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 6824
    • 9d Trost BM, Hansmann MM, Thaisrivongs DA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 4950
    • 9e Howell JM, Liu W, Young AJ, White MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 5750

    • For representative examples with nitrogen-based nucleophiles, see:
    • 9f Fraunhoffer KJ, White MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 7274
    • 9g Reed SA, White MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 3316
    • 9h Reed SA, Mazzotti AR, White MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 11701

    • For representative examples with oxygen-based nucleophiles, see:
    • 9i Chen MS, White MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 1346
    • 9j Fraunhoffer KJ, Bachovchin DA, White MC. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 223
    • 9k Chen MS, Prabagaran N, Labenz NA, White MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 6970
  • 10 Unsworth PJ, Leonori D, Aggarwal VK. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 9846

    • For other examples of borylations of π-allyl palladium complexes with B2(pin)2, see:
    • 11a Deng H.-P, Eriksson L, Szabó K. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 9207
    • 11b Tao Z.-L, Li X.-H, Han Z.-Y, Gong L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 4054
  • 12 The desired product was accompanied by ca. 10% of acetate 11 when Pd(OAc)2 was used (Figure 1).
  • 13 1,4-Diene 12 was the major product in the absence of phosphine ligands (Scheme 6).
  • 14 Taylor LD, MacDonald RJ, Rubin LE. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 1971; 9: 3059
  • 15 In Suzuki–Miyaura reactions of allylic boronic esters the isomerization of σ- to π-allyl palladium complexes was shown to be slow with respect to reductive elimination, see ref. 4g.
    • 16a Hatanaka Y, Goda K, Hiyama T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994; 35: 1279
    • 16b Denmark SE, Werner NS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 16382
    • 16c Denmark SE, Werner NS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 3612
    • 17a Trost BM, Verhoeven TR. J. Org. Chem. 1976; 41: 3215
    • 17b Trost BM, Verhoeven TR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 4730
    • 18a Matsushita H, Negishi E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982; 160
    • 18b Sheffy FK, Godschalx JP, Stille JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 4833
  • 19 Selander N, Paasch JR, Szabó KJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 409
  • 20 General Procedure Allylic boronic ester (0.50 mmol), tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) (0.50 mol%), tri(2-furyl) phosphine (2.0 mol%), and the nucleophile (1.3 equiv) were weighed into a dry flask and placed under argon [for reactions with nitrogen nucleophile 6, EtN(i-Pr)2 (5.0 mol%) was also added to the flask at this stage]. A solution of 2,6-dimethylbenzoquinone (1.3 equiv) in DMF (5.0 mL) was added in one portion, and the mixture was stirred at r.t for 16 h, or until the reaction was complete as determined by GC–MS analysis. 20% aq NaHSO3 (10 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred vigorously for 5 min. Et2O (10 mL) was added, and the layers were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (2 × 10 mL), and the combined organic phases were washed with brine (10 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (pentane–EtOAc) yielded the allylation product. Dimethyl (E)-2-(4-Phenylpent-2-en-1-yl)malonate Yield 53%; E/Z >95:5; linear to branched >95:5; Rf = 0.25 (pentane–EtOAc, 15:1); IR (neat): νmax = 2958, 1733 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.29 (3 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.56–2.62 (2 H, m), 3.39 (1 H, app p, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.41 (1 H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 3.65 (3 H, s), 3.68 (3 H, s), 5.40 (1 H, dtd, J = 15.3, 7.0, 1.3 Hz), 5.68 (1 H, ddt, J = 15.3, 7.0, 1.3 Hz), 7.10–7.21 (3 H, m), 7.21–7.32 (2 H, m). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.3, 32.0, 42.3, 52.0, 52.5, 52.5, 124.1, 126.2, 127.3, 128.5, 138.8, 145.8, 169.5. HRMS (ESI+): m/z calcd for C16H21O4Na [M + Na+]: 299.1254; found: 299.1246. (E)-4-Phenylpent-2-en-1-yl Benzoate Yield 92%; E/Z >95:5; linear to branched >95:5; Rf = 0.30 (pentane–EtOAc, 30:1). IR (neat): νmax = 2966, 1715 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.40 (3 H, d, J = 7.1 Hz), 3.53 (1 H, qd, J = 7.1, 6.6 Hz), 4.82 (2 H, m), 5.73 (1 H, dtd, J = 15.5, 6.2, 1.4 Hz), 6.05 (1 H, ddt, J = 15.5, 6.6, 1.3 Hz), 7.19–7.25 (3 H, m), 7.29–7.35 (2 H, m), 7.41–7.46 (2 H, m), 7.54 (1 H, m), 8.05-8.09 (2 H, m). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.1, 42.1, 65.6, 123.0, 126.4, 127.3, 128.4, 128.6, 129.7, 130.5, 133.0, 140.4, 145.2, 166.5. HRMS (ESI+): m/z calcd for C18H18O2Na [M + Na+]: 289.1199; found: 289.1186. Methyl (E)-(4-Phenylpent-2-en-1-yl)(tosyl)carbamate Yield 81%; E/Z >95:5; linear to branched >95:5; Rf = 0.30 (pentane–EtOAc, 6:1). IR (neat): νmax = 2961, 1732 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.38 (3 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.42 (3 H, s), 3.50 (1 H, app p, J = 6.8 Hz), 3.68 (3 H, s), 4.47 (2 H, app dt, J = 6.4, 1.2 Hz), 5.58 (1 H, dtd, J = 15.4, 6.4, 1.4 Hz), 5.98 (1 H, ddt, J = 15.4, 6.9, 1.2 Hz), 7.19–7.25 (5 H, m), 7.30–7.35 (2 H, m), 7.73–7.83 (2 H, m Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.2, 21.7, 42.1, 48.5, 53.8, 123.3, 126.3, 127.2, 128.6, 128.6, 129.3, 136.5, 140.1, 144.5, 145.3, 152.7. HRMS (ESI+): m/z calcd for C20H23O4NNaS [M + Na+]: 396.1240; found: 396.12430.