Synlett 2014; 25(07): 920-927
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1340635
account
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Viva la Resolución! Enhancing the Resolution of 1H NMR Spectra by Broadband Homonuclear Decoupling

N. Helge Meyer
Institute of Chemistry/Organic and Bioorganic Chemistry, University of Graz, Heinrichstr. 28, 8010 Graz, Austria   Fax: +43(316)3809840   Email: klaus.zangger@uni-graz.at
,
Klaus Zangger*
Institute of Chemistry/Organic and Bioorganic Chemistry, University of Graz, Heinrichstr. 28, 8010 Graz, Austria   Fax: +43(316)3809840   Email: klaus.zangger@uni-graz.at
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 31 October 2013

Accepted after revision: 07 December 2013

Publication Date:
11 March 2014 (online)


Abstract

The structural characterization of synthetic organic and natural products often relies on proton-detected NMR spectra. While the sensitivity of protons is the highest of all NMR-active nuclei, their spectral resolution is rather poor. The removal of scalar couplings leads to a large resolution enhancement by collapsing all signals to singlets. Such homonuclear broadband decoupled proton spectra, which resemble proton-decoupled 13C NMR spectra, can be obtained by several techniques, most of which require the acquisition of an additional dimension and/or special data processing. Recently introduced homonuclear decoupling during acquisition yields free induction decays (FIDs), which can be processed and analyzed like regular proton data. This approach can also be implemented in the proton dimension of any two- and multidimensional NMR spectroscopic experiment and is particularly useful when significant signal overlap renders the assignment of scalar-coupled signals impossible.

1 Introduction

2 Direct Homonuclear Broadband Decoupling

3 Experimental Considerations of Slice-Selective Decoupling

 
  • References

  • 1 Ernst RR, Primas H. Helv. Phys. Acta 1963; 36: 583
  • 2 Aue WP, Karhan J, Ernst RR. J. Chem. Phys. 1976; 64: 4226
  • 3 Shaka AJ, Keeler J, Freeman R. J. Magn. Reson. 1984; 56: 294
  • 4 Meyer NH, Zangger K. ChemPhysChem 2014; 15: 49
  • 5 Bax A, Freeman R. J. Magn. Reson. 1981; 44: 542
  • 6 Sørensen OW, Griesinger C, Ernst RR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 7778
  • 7 Pell AJ, Edden RA. E, Keeler J. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2007; 45: 296
  • 8 Jesson JP, Meakin P, Kneissel G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973; 95: 618
  • 9 Garbow JR, Weitekamp DP, Pines A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982; 93: 504
  • 10 Zangger K, Sterk H. J. Magn. Reson. 1997; 124: 486
  • 11 Aguilar JA, Nilsson M, Morris GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 9716
    • 12a Aguilar JA, Colbourne AA, Cassani J, Nilsson M, Morris GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 6460
    • 12b Aguilar JA, Faulkner S, Nilsson M, Morris GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 3901
    • 12c Nilsson M, Morris GA. Chem. Commun. 2007; 933
    • 12d Sakhaii P, Haase B, Bermel W, Kerssebaum R, Wagner GE, Zangger K. J. Magn. Reson. 2013; 233: 92
  • 13 Glanzer S, Schrank E, Zangger K. J. Magn. Reson. 2013; 232: 1
  • 14 Wagner GE, Sakhaii P, Bermel W, Zangger K. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 3155
  • 15 Lupulescu A, Olsen GL, Frydman L. J. Magn. Reson. 2012; 218: 141
  • 16 Paudel L, Adams RW, Király P, Aguilar JA, Foroozandeh M, Cliff MJ, Nilsson M, Sándor P, Waltho JP, Morris GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 11616
  • 17 Adams R. W., Aguilar D., Morris G. A., Nilsson M., Paudel L., Sandor P. Presented at the 54th ENC Conference, Pacific Grove, CA, April 14–19, 2013; Poster number 360.
  • 18 Meyer NH, Zangger K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 7143
  • 19 Kosol S, Schrank E, Bukvic-Krajacic M, Wagner GE, Meyer H, Göbl C, Zangger K, Novak P. J. Med. Chem. 2012; 55: 5632
  • 20 Geen H, Freeman R. J. Magn. Reson. 1991; 93: 93
  • 21 Meyer NH, Zangger K. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 1488