Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2697-2107
Development of a Patient-Facing Clinical Decision Support Application for Hypertension
Authors
Funding This work was funded by the following grants: 1. AHRQ 5-U18-HS026849-02 Translating Hypertension Guidelines into Practice: Development of Interoperable Clinical Decision Support. 2. AHRQ R18HS028579 Collaboration-Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH).

Abstract
Background
Hypertension is a chronic condition defined by persistent high blood pressure (BP) that contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based clinical guidelines provide recommendations for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. These recommendations are frequently incorporated into clinical decision support (CDS) tools used by clinicians. CDS tools can also be oriented toward patients but careful attention to the development process is required to make a useful, usable, and engaging digital health intervention.
Objectives
We sought to design, develop, and optimize a patient-facing CDS application for hypertension, which emphasizes home-based monitoring and collaboration with the health care team around treatment goals.
Methods
We conducted an iterative, user-centered design process to develop the application. First, we identified user needs, key components, and the technological platform. Then, we developed the integrated application and performed extensive testing to validate and optimize performance and usefulness. After identifying issues in the testing processes, we performed an additional round of optimization development.
Results
We have completed development of the COACH (Collaborative Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure) web application using JAVA and SMART on FHIR technologies with a focus on interoperability. The COACH application supports home-based BP monitoring and provides evidence-based, patient-centered CDS incorporating education, counseling, and treatment recommendations. Early results showed that we were able to increase usability, address data quality concerns, and demonstrate improved BP control in a pilot study.
Conclusion
Extensive preparatory research and user-centered design processes enabled the successful development of a novel tool for enabling management of high BP. The tool uses data from the patient's medical record and ambulatory BP monitoring to provide patient-centered CDS recommendations. We are now evaluating the tool through a multisite clinical trial.
Keywords
blood pressure - clinical practice guideline - patient self-care - home care - and e-health - requirements analysis and design - patient - consumer healthProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed by the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board, which served as a single Institutional Review Board. Oregon Health and Science University Institutional Review Board relied on the University of Missouri.
Publication History
Received: 13 February 2025
Accepted: 05 September 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
08 September 2025
Article published online:
08 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Ostchega Y, Fryar CD, Nwankwo T, Nguyen DT. Hypertension prevalence among adults aged 18 and over: United States, 2017-2018. NCHS Data Brief 2020; (364) 1-8
- 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hypertension Cascade: Hypertension Prevalence, Treatment and Control Estimates Among US Adults Aged 18 Years and Older Applying the Criteria From the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association's 2017 Hypertension Guideline—NHANES 2017-2020. Accessed August 2024 at: https://millionhearts.hhs.gov/data-reports/hypertension-prevalence.html
- 3 Zonneveld TP, Richard E, Vergouwen MD. et al. Blood pressure-lowering treatment for preventing recurrent stroke, major vascular events, and dementia in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 7 (07) CD007858
- 4 Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension 2020; 75 (02) 285-292
- 5 Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS. et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension 2018; 71 (06) 1269-1324
- 6 Griffin BR, Schinstock CA. Thinking beyond new clinical guidelines: update in hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90 (02) 273-279
- 7 Ozemek C, Tiwari S, Sabbahi A, Carbone S, Lavie CJ. Impact of therapeutic lifestyle changes in resistant hypertension. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2020; 63 (01) 4-9
- 8 Wright Jr. JT, Williamson JD, Whelton PK. et al; SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 2015; 373 (22) 2103-2116
- 9 Page MR. The JNC 8 hypertension guidelines: an in-depth guide. Am J Manag Care 2014; 20 (1 Spec No.): E8
- 10 Jaeger BC, Anstey DE, Bress AP. et al. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults aged ≥60 years according to recommendations by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and American College of Physicians/American Academy of Family Physicians. Hypertension 2019; 73 (02) 327-334
- 11 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines. Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension in the Primary Care Setting. Accessed September 16, 2025 at: https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/cd/htn/
- 12 Alper BS, Price A, van Zuuren EJ. et al. Consistency of recommendations for evaluation and management of hypertension. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (11) e1915975
- 13 Dorr DA, Richardson JE, Bobo M. et al. Provider perspectives on patient- and provider-facing high blood pressure clinical decision support. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 1131-1140
- 14 Koopman RJ, Canfield SM, Belden JL. et al. Home blood pressure data visualization for the management of hypertension: designing for patient and physician information needs. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20 (01) 195
- 15 Naik AD, Kallen MA, Walder A, Street Jr RL. Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication. Circulation 2008; 117 (11) 1361-1368
- 16 Heisler M. Actively engaging patients in treatment decision making and monitoring as a strategy to improve hypertension outcomes in diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2008; 117 (11) 1355-1357
- 17 Valenzuela PL, Carrera-Bastos P, Gálvez BG. et al. Lifestyle interventions for the prevention and treatment of hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021; 18 (04) 251-275
- 18 Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data into Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care Settings: A Practical Guide; 2021.
- 19 Campbell R. The five “rights” of clinical decision support. J AHIMA 2013; 84 (10) 42-47 , quiz 48
- 20 Lobach DSG, Bright TJ. et al. Enabling Health Care Decisionmaking Through Clinical Decision Support and Knowledge Management; 2012. April 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK97318/
- 21 Vuppala S, Turer CB. Clinical decision support for the diagnosis and management of adult and pediatric hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2020; 22 (09) 67
- 22 Samal L, Kilgallon JL, Lipsitz S. et al. Clinical decision support for hypertension management in chronic kidney disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184 (05) 484-492
- 23 Marcial LH, Richardson JE, Lasater B. et al. The imperative for patient-centered clinical decision support. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2018; 6 (01) 12
- 24 Dullabh P, Zott C, Gauthreaux N, Swiger J, Lomotan E, Sittig DF. New performance measurement framework for realizing patient-centered clinical decision support: qualitative development study. J Med Internet Res 2025; 27: e68674
- 25 Khoong EC, Olazo K, Rivadeneira NA. et al. Mobile health strategies for blood pressure self-management in urban populations with digital barriers: systematic review and meta-analyses. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4 (01) 114
- 26 Kitt J, Fox R, Tucker KL, McManus RJ. New approaches in hypertension management: a review of current and developing technologies and their potential impact on hypertension care. Curr Hypertens Rep 2019; 21 (06) 44
- 27 McLean G, Band R, Saunderson K. et al; DIPSS co-investigators. Digital interventions to promote self-management in adults with hypertension systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2016; 34 (04) 600-612
- 28 Bozorgi A, Hosseini H, Eftekhar H. et al. The effect of the mobile “blood pressure management application” on hypertension self-management enhancement: a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22 (01) 413
- 29 Persell SD, Peprah YA, Lipiszko D. et al. Effect of home blood pressure monitoring via a smartphone hypertension coaching application or tracking application on adults with uncontrolled hypertension: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (03) e200255
- 30 Li R, Liang N, Bu F, Hesketh T. The effectiveness of self-management of hypertension in adults using mobile health: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 (03) e17776
- 31 Kario K, Harada N, Okura A. Digital therapeutics in hypertension: evidence and perspectives. Hypertension 2022; 79 (10) 2148-2158
- 32 The ONC Cures Act Final Rule (2016).
- 33 Witteman HO, Maki KG, Vaisson G. et al. Systematic development of patient decision aids: an update from the IPDAS collaboration. Med Decis Making 2021; 41 (07) 736-754
- 34 Dorr DA, D'Autremont C, Pizzimenti C. et al. Assessing data adequacy for high blood pressure clinical decision support: a quantitative analysis. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (04) 710-720
- 35 Dorr D, D'Autremont C, Richardson JE. et al. Patient-facing clinical decision support for high blood pressure control: patient survey. JMIR Cardio 2023; 7: e39490
- 36 Oregon Health & Science University. OHSU Hypertension Implementation Guide; 2025. https://build.fhir.org/ig/OHSUCMP/htnu18ig/index.html
- 37 Clinical Quality Framework. Welcome to CQFramework. 2025. https://github.com/cqframework
- 38 Wegier P, Belden JL, Canfield SM. et al. Home blood pressure data visualization for the management of hypertension: using human factors and design principles. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21 (01) 235
- 39 Canfield SM, Koopman RJ. Facilitators and barriers to integrating patient-generated blood pressure data into primary care EHR workflows. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (05) 942-951
- 40 Shaffer VA, Wegier P, Valentine KD. et al. Patient judgments about hypertension control: the role of patient numeracy and graph literacy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (11) 1829-1837
- 41 Dorr DA, Montgomery E, Ghumman AJ. et al; COACH Consortium. Study protocol: Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH) in adults - a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14 (07) e085898
- 42 Dullabh P, Heaney-Huls K, Lobach DF. et al. The technical landscape for patient-centered CDS: progress, gaps, and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (06) 1101-1105
- 43 Sittig DF, Boxwala A, Wright A. et al. Patient-centered clinical decision support challenges and opportunities identified from workflow execution models. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31 (08) 1682-1692
- 44 Canfield SM, Stanley Y, Ghosh P, Braddock A, Foraker R. Using RE-AIM to inform the adaptation of a clinical decision support application for hypertension disorders of pregnancy: a qualitative study of provider perspectives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025; 25 (01) 527
- 45 Canfield SMRA, Ghosh P, Martinez W. et al. 'Everyone has a role in this': evaluating organizational readiness for a digital solution to support hypertension care teams and patients. Appl Clin Inform 2025 (e-pub ahead of print)