Synthesis 2022; 54(13): 2976-2990
DOI: 10.1055/a-1806-4513
short review

Mechanisms of the Nickel-Catalysed Hydrogenolysis and Cross-Coupling of Aryl Ethers

Andryj M. Borys
,
Eva Hevia
We thank the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNSF, 188753) and the University of Bern for their generous sponsorship of this research.


Abstract

The Ni-catalysed hydrogenolysis and cross-coupling of aryl ethers has emerged as a powerful synthetic tool to transform inert phenol-derived electrophiles into functionalised aromatic molecules. This has attracted significant interest due to its potential to convert the lignin fraction of biomass into chemical feedstocks, or to enable orthogonal reactivity and late-stage synthetic modification. Although the scope of nucleophiles employed, and hence the C–C and C–heteroatom bonds that can be forged, has expanded significantly since Wenkert’s seminal work in 1979, mechanistic understanding on how these reactions operate is still uncertain since the comparatively inert Caryl–O bond of aryl ethers challenge the involvement of classical mechanisms involving direct oxidative addition to Ni(0). In this review, we document the different mechanisms that have been proposed in the Ni-catalysed hydrogenolysis and cross-coupling of aryl ethers. These include: (i) direct oxidative addition; (ii) Lewis acid assisted C–O bond cleavage; (iii) anionic nickelates, and; (iv) Ni(I) intermediates. Experimental and theoretical investigations by numerous research groups have generated a pool of knowledge that will undoubtedly facilitate future discoveries in the development of novel Ni-catalysed transformations of aryl ethers.

1 Introduction

2 Direct Oxidative Addition

3 Hydrogenolysis of Aryl Ethers

4 Lewis Acid Assisted C–O Bond Cleavage

5 Anionic Nickelates

6 Ni(I) Intermediates

7 The ‘Naphthalene Problem’

8 Conclusions and Outlook



Publication History

Received: 24 February 2022

Accepted after revision: 23 March 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 March 2022

Article published online:
11 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Tasker SZ, Standley EA, Jamison TF. Nature 2014; 509: 299
  • 2 Hazari N, Melvin PR, Beromi MM. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017; 1: 0025
  • 3 Diccianni JB, Diao T. Trends Chem. 2019; 1: 830
  • 4 Zhang K, Conda-Sheridan M, Cooke SR, Louie J. Organometallics 2011; 30: 2546
  • 5 Inatomi T, Fukahori Y, Yamada Y, Ishikawa R, Kanegawa S, Koga Y, Matsubara K. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019; 9: 1784
  • 6 Bismuto A, Müller P, Finkelstein P, Trapp N, Jeschke G, Morandi B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 10642
  • 7 Zheng B, Tang F, Luo J, Schultz JW, Rath NP, Mirica LM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 6499
  • 8 Rosen BM, Quasdorf KW, Wilson DA, Zhang N, Resmerita A, Garg NK, Percec V. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 1346
  • 9 Qiu Z, Li CJ. Chem. Rev. 2020; 120: 10454
  • 10 Wenkert E, Michelotti EL, Swindell CS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979; 101: 2246
  • 11 Zarate C, van Gemmeren M, Somerville RJ, Martin R. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 2016; 66: 143
  • 12 Tobisu M, Chatani N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 1717
  • 13 Tobisu M, Shimasaki T, Chatani N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 4866
  • 14 Schwarzer MC, Konno R, Hojo T, Ohtsuki A, Nakamura K, Yasutome A, Takahashi H, Shimasaki T, Tobisu M, Chatani N, Mori S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 10347
  • 15 Luo Y.-R. Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2007
  • 16 Kelley P, Lin S, Edouard G, Day MW, Agapie T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 5480
  • 17 Cornella J, Gómez-Bengoa E, Martin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 1997
  • 18 Ogawa H, Minami H, Ozaki T, Komagawa S, Wang C, Uchiyama M. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 13904
  • 19 Kojima K, Yang ZK, Wang C, Uchiyama M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2017; 65: 862
  • 20 Borys AM, Hevia E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 24659
  • 21 Álvarez-Bercedo P, Martin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 17352
  • 22 Sergeev AG, Hartwig JF. Science 2011; 332: 439
  • 23 Tobisu M, Morioka T, Ohtsuki A, Chatani N. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 3410
  • 24 Brauer DJ, Krueger C. Inorg. Chem. 1977; 16: 884
  • 25 Li Z, Zhang SL, Fu Y, Guo QX, Liu L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 8815
  • 26 Quasdorf KW, Antoft-Finch A, Liu P, Silberstein AL, Komaromi A, Blackburn T, Ramgren SD, Houk KN, Snieckus V, Garg NK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 6352
  • 27 Ortuño MA, Lledós A, Maseras F, Ujaque G. ChemCatChem 2014; 6: 3132
  • 28 Amatore C, Jutand A, Le Duc G. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 2492
  • 29 Zakzeski J, Bruijnincx PC. A, Jongerius AL, Weckhuysen BM. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 3552
  • 30 Sawatlon B, Wititsuwannakul T, Tantirungrotechai Y, Surawatanawong P. Dalton Trans. 2014; 43: 18123
  • 31 Xu L, Chung LW, Wu YD. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 483
  • 32 Saper NI, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 17667
  • 33 Hoshimoto Y, Hayashi Y, Suzuki H, Ohashi M, Ogoshi S. Organometallics 2014; 33: 1276
  • 34 Liu X, Hsiao CC, Kalvet I, Leiendecker M, Guo L, Schoenebeck F, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 6093
  • 35 Kelley P, Edouard GA, Lin S, Agapie T. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 17173
  • 36 Leiendecker M, Hsiao CC, Guo L, Alandini N, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 12912
  • 37 Yang Z, Wang D, Minami H, Ogawa H, Ozaki T, Saito T, Miyamoto K, Wang C, Uchiyama M. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 15693
  • 38 Yang Z.-K, Xu N.-X, Takita R, Muranaka A, Wang C, Uchiyama M. Nat. Commun. 2018; 9: 1587
  • 39 Dankwardt JW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 2428
  • 40 Xie LG, Wang ZX. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 4972
  • 41 Iglesias MJ, Prieto A, Nicasio MC. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 4318
  • 42 Wang C, Ozaki T, Takita R, Uchiyama M. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 3482
  • 43 Tobisu M, Takahira T, Morioka T, Chatani N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 6711
  • 44 Rawat VK, Higashida K, Sawamura M. Synthesis 2021; 53: 3379
  • 45 Seki R, Hara N, Saito T, Nakao Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 6388
  • 46 Zarate C, Nakajima M, Martin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 1191
  • 47 Wang B, Zhang Q, Jiang J, Yu H, Fu Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 17249
  • 48 Jain P, Pal S, Avasare V. Organometallics 2018; 37: 1141
  • 49 Jonas K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1976; 15: 47
  • 50 Jonas K, Pörschke KR, Krüger C, Tsay Y.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1976; 15: 621
  • 51 Brauer BD. J, Krüger C, Roberts PJ, Tsay Y.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1976; 15: 48
  • 52 Compound 44 was previously documented as the THF and TMEDA solvate in a progress report and review. Details of their preparation and characterisation were not included in these early reports. Jonas VK, Krüger C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1980; 19: 520
  • 53 Pörschke K.-R, Jonas K, Wilke G, Benn R, Mynott R, Goddard R. Chem. Ber. 1985; 118: 275
  • 54 Pörschke K.-R, Jonas K, Wilke G. Chem. Ber. 1988; 121: 1913
  • 55 Kaschube W, Pörschke K.-R, Angermund K, Kriiger C, Wilke G. Chem. Ber. 1988; 121: 1921
  • 56 Balakrishnan V, Murugesan V, Chindan B, Rasappan R. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 1333
  • 57 Balakrishnan V, Murugesan V, Chindan B, Rasappan R. Inorg. Chem. 2022; 61: 1438
  • 58 Nattmann L, Lutz S, Ortsack P, Goddard R, Cornella J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 13628
  • 59 Lutz S, Nattmann L, Nöthling N, Cornella J. Organometallics 2021; 40: 2220
  • 60 Zarate C, Manzano R, Martin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 6754