Appl Clin Inform 2017; 08(03): 949-963
DOI: 10.4338/ACI2017040069
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Redesign of computerized decision support to improve antimicrobial prescribing

A controlled before-and-after study
Melissa T. Baysari
1  Centre for Health Systems & Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney Australia
2  St Vincent’s Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia
,
Jessica Del Gigante
3  Department of Pharmacy, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney Australia
,
Maria Moran
4  Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney Australia
,
Indy Sandaradura
2  St Vincent’s Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia
5  Department of Microbiology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney Australia
,
Ling Li
1  Centre for Health Systems & Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney Australia
,
Katrina L. Richardson
6  Sydney IT Service Centre, St Vincent’s Health Australia
,
Anmol Sandhu
3  Department of Pharmacy, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney Australia
,
Elin C. Lehnbom
7  Department of Pharmacy, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
,
Johanna I. Westbrook
1  Centre for Health Systems & Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney Australia
,
Richard O. Day
2  St Vincent’s Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia
4  Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 28 April 2017

accepted in revised form: 01 August 2017

Publication Date:
20 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objective: To determine the impact of the introduction of new pre-written orders for antimicrobials in a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system on 1) accuracy of documented indications for antimicrobials in the CPOE system, 2) appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing, and 3) compliance with the hospital’s antimicrobial policy. Prescriber opinions of the new decision support were also explored to determine why the redesign was effective or ineffective in altering prescribing practices.

Methods: The study comprised two parts: a controlled pre-post study and qualitative interviews. The intervention involved the redesign of pre-written orders for half the antimicrobials so that approved indications were incorporated into pre-written orders. 555 antimicrobials prescribed before (September – October, 2013) and 534 antimicrobials prescribed after (March – April, 2015) the intervention on all general wards of a hospital were audited by study pharmacists. Eleven prescribers participated in semi-structured interviews.

Results: Redesign of computerized decision support did not result in more appropriate or compliant antimicrobial prescribing, nor did it improve accuracy of indication documentation in the CPOE system (Intervention antimicrobials: appropriateness 49% vs. 50%; compliance 44% vs. 42%; accuracy 58% vs. 38%; all p>0.05). Via our interviews with prescribers we identified five main reasons for this, primarily that indications entered into the CPOE system were not monitored or followed-up, and that the antimicrobial approval process did not align well with prescriber workflow.

Conclusion: Redesign of pre-written orders to incorporate appropriate indications did not improve antimicrobial prescribing. Workarounds are likely when compliance with hospital policy creates additional work for prescribers or when system usability is poor. Implementation of IT, in the absence of support or follow-up, is unlikely to achieve all anticipated benefits.

Citation: Baysari MT, Del Gigante J, Moran M, Sandaradura I, Li L, Richardson KL, Sandhu A, Lehnbom EC, Westbrook JI, Day RO. Redesign of computerized decision support to improve antimicrobial prescribing. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 949–963 https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI2017042017040069

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


Human subjects protection

This research was approved by the hospital’s Human Research Ethics Committee.