PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2014; 05(01): 232-248
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-10-RA-0079
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Home blood pressure monitoring, secure electronic messaging and medication intensification for improving hypertension control

A mediation analysis
J.D. Ralston
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
,
A.J. Cook
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
,
M.L. Anderson
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
,
S.L. Catz
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
,
P.A. Fishman
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
,
J. Carlson
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
,
R. Johnson
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
,
B.B. Green
1   Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101–1448
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received: 17. Oktober 2013

accepted: 16. Januar 2014

Publikationsdatum:
20. Dezember 2017 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objective: We evaluated the role of home monitoring, communication with pharmacists, medication intensification, medication adherence and lifestyle factors in contributing to the effectiveness of an intervention to improve blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension.

Methods: We performed a mediation analysis of a published randomized trial based on the Chronic Care Model delivered over a secure patient website from June 2005 to December 2007. Study arms analyzed included usual care with a home blood pressure monitor and usual care with home blood pressure monitor and web-based pharmacist care. Mediator measures included secure messaging and telephone encounters; home blood pressure monitoring; medications intensification and adherence and lifestyle factors. Overall fidelity to the Chronic Care Model was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Care (PACIC) instrument. The primary outcome was percent of participants with blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mm Hg.

Results: At 12 months follow-up, patients in the web-based pharmacist care group were more likely to have BP <140/90 mm Hg (55%) compared to patients in the group with home blood pressure monitors only (37%) (p = 0.001). Home blood pressure monitoring accounted for 30.3% of the intervention effect, secure electronic messaging accounted for 96%, and medication intensification for 29.3%. Medication adherence and self-report of fruit and vegetable intake and weight change were not different between the two study groups. The PACIC score accounted for 22.0 % of the main intervention effect.

Conclusions: The effect of web-based pharmacist care on improved blood pressure control was explained in part through a combination of home blood pressure monitoring, secure messaging, and antihypertensive medication intensification.

Citation: Ralston JD, Cook AJ, Anderson ML, Catz SL, Fishman PA, Carlson J, Johnson R, Green BB. Home blood pressure monitoring, secure electronic messaging and medication intensification for improving hypertension control: a mediation analysis. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 232–248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-10-RA-0079

Keywords

Personal health records - patient-provider communication - telemedicine and telehealth - remote monitoring - internet portal - patient self-care - home care and e-health
 

  • References

  • 1 Agarwal R, Bills JE, Hecht TJ, Light RP. Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 2011; 57: 29-38.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Okonofua EC, Simpson KN, Jesri A, Rehman SU, Durkalski VL, Egan BM. Therapeutic inertia is an impediment to achieving the Healthy People 2010 blood pressure control goals. Hypertension 2006; 47: 345-351.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vrijens B, Vincze G, Kristanto P, Urquhart J, Burnier M. Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive drug treatments: longitudinal study of electronically compiled dosing histories. BMJ 2008; 336: 1114-1117.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Green BB, Cook AJ, Ralston JD, Fishman PA, Catz SL, Carlson J, Carrell D, Tyll L, Larson EB, Thompson RS. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, web communication, and pharmacist care on hyper-tension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299: 2857-2867.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Magid DJ, Ho PM, Olson KL, Brand DW, Welch LK, Snow KE, Lambert-Kerzner AC, Plomondon ME, Havranek EP. A multimodal blood pressure control intervention in 3 healthcare systems. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17: e96-e103.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Weber CA, Ernst ME, Sezate GS, Zheng S, Carter BL. Pharmacist-physician comanagement of hypertension and reduction in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1634-1639.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McLean DL, McAlister FA, Johnson JA, King KM, Makowsky MJ, Jones CA, Tsuyuki RT. A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist and nurse care on improving blood pressure management in patients with diabetes mellitus: study of cardiovascular risk intervention by pharmacists-hypertension (SCRIP-HTN). Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 2355-2361.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ralston JD, Carrell D, Reid R, Anderson M, Moran M, Hereford J. Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14: 798-806.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Green BB, Ralston JD, Fishman PA, Catz SL, Cook A, Carlson J, Tyll L, Carrell D, Thompson RS. Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework. Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29: 376-395.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2006; 11: 27-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 O’Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ 2001; 322: 531-536.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996; 74: 511-544.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, Kessels AG, de Leeuw PW. Home blood pressure measurement: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 743-751.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY, NY: W. H. Freeman; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Carrell D, Ralston JD. Messages, Strands and Threads: Measuring Electronic Patient-Provider Messaging. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Session.. Washington DC: 2005
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schmittdiel JA, Uratsu CS, Karter AJ, Heisler M, Subramanian U, Mangione CM, Selby JV. Why don’t diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 588-594.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, Ahmed AT, Schmittdiel JA, Selby JV. New prescription medication gaps: a comprehensive measure of adherence to new prescriptions. Health Serv Res 2009; 44: 1640-1661.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 CD000011.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jacobs Jr., DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 81-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Beresford SA, Thompson B, Feng Z, Christianson A, McLerran D, Patrick DL. Seattle 5 a Day worksite program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Prev Med 2001; 32: 230-238.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care 2005; 43: 436-444.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res 2004; 39: 1005-1026.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 1173-1182.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 702-706.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Magid DJ, Olson KL, Billups SJ, Wagner NM, Lyons EE, Kroner BA. A pharmacist-led, American Heart Association Heart360 Web-enabled home blood pressure monitoring program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 157-163.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Margolis KL, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, Dehmer SP, Groen SE, Kadrmas HM, Kerby TJ, Klotzle KJ, Maciosek MV, Michels RD, O’Connor PJ, Pritchard RA, Sekenski JL, Sperl-Hillen JM, Trower NK. Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 46-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Hoath J, Mullen M, Cheadle A, Goldberg HI. Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 234-239.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Simon GE, Ralston JD, Savarino J, Pabiniak C, Wentzel C, Operskalski BH. Randomized trial of depression follow-up care by online messaging. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 698-704.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Borowitz SM, Wyatt JC. The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. JAMA 1998; 280: 1321-1324.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Widman LE, Tong DA. Requests for medical advice from patients and families to health care providers who publish on the World Wide Web. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 209-212.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 1-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands DZ. Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 91-95.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zhou YY, Garrido T, Chin HL, Wiesenthal AM, Liang LL. Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manag Care 2007; 13: 418-424.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar