Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(01): 252-262
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743237
State of the Art/Best Practice Paper

Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Food Practice into Clinical Decision-Making

Mustafa Ozkaynak
1   College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Stephen Voida
2   Department of Information Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States
,
Emily Dunn
1   College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Food practice plays an important role in health. Food practice data collected in daily living settings can inform clinical decisions. However, integrating such data into clinical decision-making is burdensome for both clinicians and patients, resulting in poor adherence and limited utilization. Automation offers benefits in this regard, minimizing this burden resulting in a better fit with a patient's daily living routines, and creating opportunities for better integration into clinical workflow. Although the literature on patient-generated health data (PGHD) can serve as a starting point for the automation of food practice data, more diverse characteristics of food practice data provide additional challenges.

Objectives We describe a series of steps for integrating food practices into clinical decision-making. These steps include the following: (1) sensing food practice; (2) capturing food practice data; (3) representing food practice; (4) reflecting the information to the patient; (5) incorporating data into the EHR; (6) presenting contextualized food practice information to clinicians; and (7) integrating food practice into clinical decision-making.

Methods We elaborate on automation opportunities and challenges in each step, providing a summary visualization of the flow of food practice-related data from daily living settings to clinical settings.

Results We propose four implications of automating food practice hereinafter. First, there are multiple ways of automating workflow related to food practice. Second, steps may occur in daily living and others in clinical settings. Food practice data and the necessary contextual information should be integrated into clinical decision-making to enable action. Third, as accuracy becomes important for food practice data, macrolevel data may have advantages over microlevel data in some situations. Fourth, relevant systems should be designed to eliminate disparities in leveraging food practice data.

Conclusion Our work confirms previously developed recommendations in the context of PGHD work and provides additional specificity on how these recommendations apply to food practice.

Keywords

clinical decision-making - workflow - food practice - clinical informatics - self-tracking

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human and/or animal subjects were included.




Publication History

Received: 08 June 2021

Accepted: 03 January 2022

Article published online:
23 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Brons A, Oosterveer P, Wertheim-Heck S. Inconspicuous sustainability in food practices of Dutch consumers with type 2 diabetes. Environ Sociol 2021; 7: 25-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ozkaynak M, Valdez R, Hannah K, Woodhouse G, Klem P. Understanding gaps between daily living and clinical settings in chronic disease management: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 (02) e17590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cornet V, Voida S, Holden RJ. Activity theory analysis of heart failure self-care. Mind Cult Act 2018; 25 (01) 22-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brennan PF, Downs S, Casper G. Project HealthDesign: rethinking the power and potential of personal health records. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (5, suppl): S3-S5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 What are patient-generated health data?. Accessed May 5, 2021 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/otherhot-topics/what-are-patient-generated-health-data
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ozkaynak M, Novak LL, Choi YK. et al. Emerging methods for patient ergonomics. In: Holden RJ, and. Valdez RS. eds. The Patient Factor: A Handbook on Patient Ergonomics. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2021
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ozkaynak M, Valdez R, Holden RJ, Weiss J. Infinicare framework for integrated understanding of health-related activities in clinical and daily-living contexts. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2017; 7 (01) 66-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Zhang R, Burgess ER, Reddy MC. et al. Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open 2019; 2 (01) 73-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Demiris G, Iribarren SJ, Sward K, Lee S, Yang R. Patient generated health data use in clinical practice: a systematic review. Nurs Outlook 2019; 67 (04) 311-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Austin E, Lee JR, Amtmann D. et al. Use of patient-generated health data across healthcare settings: implications for health systems. JAMIA Open 2019; 3 (01) 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Adler-Milstein J, Nong P. Early experiences with patient generated health data: health system and patient perspectives. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 952-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cordeiro F, Bales E, Cherry E. et al. Rethinking the mobile food journal: exploring opportunities for lightweight photo-based capture. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Association for Computing Machinery; 2015: 3207-3216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ye J. The impact of electronic health record-integrated patient-generated health data on clinician burnout. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 1051-1056
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Comber R, Hoonhout J, Halteren AV. et al. Food practices as situated action: exploring and designing for everyday food practices with households. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris, France: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013: 2457-2466
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Hardcastle SJ, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Chatzisarantis NL. Food choice and nutrition: a social psychological perspective. Nutrients 2015; 7 (10) 8712-8715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Orji R, Mandryk RL. Developing culturally relevant design guidelines for encouraging healthy eating behavior. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2014; 72: 207-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ozkaynak M, Unertl KM, Johnson S. et al. Clinical workflow analysis, process redesign and quality improvement. In: Finnel JT, and. Dixon BE. eds. Clinical Informatics Study Guide. New York, NY: Springer; 2016: 135-161
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zayas-Cabán T, Haque SN, Kemper N. Identifying opportunities for workflow automation in health care: lessons learned from other industries. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (03) 686-697
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Arab L, Estrin D, Kim DH, Burke J, Goldman J. Feasibility testing of an automated image-capture method to aid dietary recall. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65 (10) 1156-1162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rahman T, Adams AT, Zhang M. et al. BodyBeat: a mobile system for sensing non-speech body sounds. Accessed January 24, 2022 at: https://pac.cs.cornell.edu/pubs/body-beat-mobisys-2014.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zhang S, Zhao Y, Nguyen DT. et al. NeckSense: a multi-sensor necklace for detecting eating activities in free-living conditions. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2020; 4 (02) 72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mankoff J, Hsieh G, Hung HC. et al. Using low-cost sensing to support nutritional awareness. In: Borriello G, Holmquist LE. eds. UbiComp 2002: Ubiquitous Computing. Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2002: 371-378
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Basiotis PP, Welsh SO, Cronin FJ, Kelsay JL, Mertz W. Number of days of food intake records required to estimate individual and group nutrient intakes with defined confidence. J Nutr 1987; 117 (09) 1638-1641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Johnson RK. Dietary intake–how do we measure what people are really eating?. Obes Res 2002; 10 (10, suppl 1): 63S-68S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Block G, Gillespie C, Rosenbaum EH, Jenson C. A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18 (04) 284-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Johnston EA, Petersen KS, Beasley JM. et al. Relative validity and reliability of a diet risk score (DRS) for clinical practice. BMJ Nutr Prev Health 2020; 3 (02) 263-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gills SM, Baker SS, Auld G. Collection methods for the 24-hour dietary recall as used in the expanded food and nutrition education program. J Nutr Educ Behav 2017; 49 (03) 250-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Freedman LS, Commins JM, Moler JE. et al. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 180 (02) 172-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Monaghan M, Hilliard M, Sweenie R, Riekert K. Transition readiness in adolescents and emerging adults with diabetes: the role of patient-provider communication. Curr Diab Rep 2013; 13 (06) 900-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Patel NJ, Datye KA, Jaser SS. Importance of patient-provider communication to adherence in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Healthcare (Basel) 2018; 6 (02) 30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN. et al. Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: a systematic review. Prev Med 2016; 93 (93) 96-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ratanawongsa N, Karter AJ, Parker MM. et al. Communication and medication refill adherence: the Diabetes Study of Northern California. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173 (03) 210-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Schoenthaler A, Allegrante JP, Chaplin W, Ogedegbe G. The effect of patient-provider communication on medication adherence in hypertensive black patients: does race concordance matter?. Ann Behav Med 2012; 43 (03) 372-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Schoenthaler A, Chaplin WF, Allegrante JP. et al. Provider communication effects medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 75 (02) 185-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Young HN, Len-Rios ME, Brown R, Moreno MM, Cox E. How does patient-provider communication influence adherence to asthma medications?. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100 (04) 696-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Janson SL, McGrath KW, Covington JK, Cheng SC, Boushey HA. Individualized asthma self-management improves medication adherence and markers of asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123 (04) 840-846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lewis MP, Colbert A, Erlen J, Meyers M. A qualitative study of persons who are 100% adherent to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Care 2006; 18 (02) 140-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sanders MJ, Van Oss T. Using daily routines to promote medication adherence in older adults. Am J Occup Ther 2013; 67 (01) 91-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lewinski AA, Drake C, Shaw RJ. et al. Bridging the integration gap between patient-generated blood glucose data and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (07) 667-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Marquard JL, Garber L, Saver B, Amster B, Kelleher M, Preusse P. Overcoming challenges integrating patient-generated data into the clinical EHR: lessons from the CONtrolling Disease Using Inexpensive IT–Hypertension in Diabetes (CONDUIT-HID) Project. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (10) 903-910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Plastiras P, O'Sullivan D. Exchanging personal health data with electronic health records: A standardized information model for patient generated health data and observations of daily living. Int J Med Inform 2018; 120: 116-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Sujansky W, Kunz D. A standard-based model for the sharing of patient-generated health information with electronic health records. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 2015; 19: 9-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gandrup J, Ali SM, McBeth J, van der Veer SN, Dixon WG. Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (11) 1752-1763
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 West P, Kleek MV, Giordano R. et al. Common barriers to the use of patient-generated data across clinical settings. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Montreal QC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery; 2018: 484
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Association AD. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care 2021; 44 (Suppl. 01) S15-S33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report 2020. Accessed January 24, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ackermann RT, Cheng YJ, Williamson DF, Gregg EW. Identifying adults at high risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease using hemoglobin A1c National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. Am J Prev Med 2011; 40 (01) 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Association AD. American Diabetes Association. 3. Prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care 2021; 44 (Suppl. 01) S34-S39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Harris MF, Fanaian M, Jayasinghe UW. et al. What predicts patient-reported GP management of smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and weight?. Aust J Prim Health 2012; 18 (02) 123-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Ball L, Johnson C, Desbrow B, Leveritt M. General practitioners can offer effective nutrition care to patients with lifestyle-related chronic disease. J Prim Health Care 2013; 5 (01) 59-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Vu T, Lin F, Alshurafa N. et al. Wearable food intake monitoring technologies: a comprehensive review. Computers 2017; 6: 4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Bedri A, Li D, Khurana R. et al. FitByte: automatic diet monitoring in unconstrained situations using multimodal sensing on eyeglasses. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020: 1-12
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Chun KS, Bhattacharya S, Thomaz E. Detecting eating episodes by tracking jawbone movements with a non-contact wearable sensor. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2018; 2: 4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Kadomura A, Li C-Y, Chen Y-C. et al. Sensing fork: eating behavior detection utensil and mobile persuasive game. In: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris, France: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013: 1551-1556
  • 55 Thomaz E, Essa I, Abowd GD. A practical approach for recognizing eating moments with wrist-mounted inertial sensing. Proc ACM Int Conf Ubiquitous Comput 2015; 2015: 1029-1040
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Gerhardsson KM, Laike T. User acceptance of a personalised home lighting system based on wearable technology. Appl Ergon 2021; 96: 103480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Kalantarian H, Alshurafa N, Le T, Sarrafzadeh M. Monitoring eating habits using a piezoelectric sensor-based necklace. Comput Biol Med 2015; 58 (58) 46-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Kalantarian H, Sarrafzadeh M. Audio-based detection and evaluation of eating behavior using the smartwatch platform. Comput Biol Med 2015; 65 (65) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Choe EK, Abdullah S, Rabbi M. et al. Semi-automated tracking: a balanced approach for self-monitoring applications. IEEE Pervasive Comput 2017; 16: 74-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Mamykina L, Miller AD, Grevet C. et al. Examining the impact of collaborative tagging on sensemaking in nutrition management. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery; 2011: 657-666
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Ye X, Chen G, Gao Y. et al. Assisting food journaling with automatic eating detection. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Jose, California, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2016: 3255-3262
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Meegahapola L, Ruiz-Correa S, Robledo-Valero VdC. et al. One more bite? Inferring food consumption level of college students using smartphone sensing and self-reports. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2021; 5: 26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Mamykina L, Mynatt E, Davidson P. et al. MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Florence, Italy: Association for Computing Machinery; 2008: 477-486
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Hingle M, Patrick H. There are thousands of apps for that: navigating mobile technology for nutrition education and behavior. J Nutr Educ Behav 2016; 48 (03) 213-8.e1 , e211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for Health. 2013. . Pew Research Center
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ. et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88 (02) 324-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Livingstone MB, Black AE. Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr 2003; 133 (133, Suppl 3): 895S-920S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Andrew AH, Borriello G, Fogarty J. Simplifying mobile phone food diaries: design and evaluation of a food index-based nutrition diary. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. Venice, Italy: ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering); 2013: 260-263
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Siek KA, Connelly KH, Rogers Y. et al. When do we eat? An evaluation of food items input into an electronic food monitoring application. In: Pervasive Health Conference and Workshops, November 29–December 1, 2006: 1-10
    PubMed
  • 70 Deng L, Cox LP. LiveCompare: grocery bargain hunting through participatory sensing. In: Proceedings of the 10th workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. Santa Cruz, CA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Zhang Y, Parker AG. Eat4Thought: a design of food journaling. extended abstracts of the 2020 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. Honolulu, HI: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020: 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Wang DH, Kogashiwa M, Kira S. Development of a new instrument for evaluating individuals' dietary intakes. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106 (10) 1588-1593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Chung C-F, Agapie E, Schroeder J. et al. When personal tracking becomes social: examining the use of Instagram for healthy eating. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver, CO: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017: 1674-1687
    PubMed
  • 74 Ming Z-Y, Chen J, Cao Y. et al. Food photo recognition for dietary tracking: system and experiment. In: Schoeffmann K, Chalidabhongse TH, Ngo CW. et al, eds. MultiMedia Modeling. Cham.: Springer International Publishing; 2018: 129-141
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Epstein DA, Cordeiro F, Fogarty J. et al. Crumbs: lightweight daily food challenges to promote engagement and mindfulness. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Jose, CA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2016: 5632-5644
    PubMed
  • 76 Luhanga ET, Hippocrate AAE, Suwa H. et al. Happyinu: exploring how to use games and extrinsic rewards for consistent food tracking behavior. In: 2016 Ninth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU) 4–6 October, 2016 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Books; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Cordeiro F, Epstein DA, Thomaz E. et al. Barriers and negative nudges: exploring challenges in food journaling. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Association for Computing Machinery; 2015: 1159-1162
    PubMed
  • 79 Cantais J, Domínguez D, Gigante V, Laera L, Tamma V. An example of food ontology for diabetes control. Accessed January 24, 2022 at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.137.8373&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Dooley DM, Griffiths EJ, Gosal GS. et al. FoodOn: a harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, quality control and data integration. NPJ Sci Food 2018; 2: 23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Musen MA, Protégé T. Protégé Team. The Protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 2015; 1 (04) 4-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Courtot M, Gibson F, Lister A. et al. MIREOT: the minimum information to reference an external ontology term. Nat Preced 2009; DOI: 10.1038/npre.2009.3576.1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Hoehndorf R, Schofield PN, Gkoutos GV. The role of ontologies in biological and biomedical research: a functional perspective. Brief Bioinform 2015; 16 (06) 1069-1080
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Castellano-Escuder P, González-Domínguez R, Wishart DS, Andrés-Lacueva C, Sánchez-Pla A. FOBI: an ontology to represent food intake data and associate it with metabolomic data. Database (Oxford) 2020; 2020: baaa033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Dragoni M, Bailoni T, Maimone R. et al. HeLiS: an ontology for supporting healthy lifestyles. In: Vrandečić D, Bontcheva K, Suárez-Figueroa MC. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2018. Monterey, CA: Cham. Springer International Publishing; 2018: 53-69
    Google Scholar
  • 86 Youn J, Naravane T, Tagkopoulos I. Using word Embeddings to learn a better food ontology. Front Artif Intell 2020; 3: 584784-584784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Rabbi M, Pfammatter A, Zhang M, Spring B, Choudhury T. Automated personalized feedback for physical activity and dietary behavior change with mobile phones: a randomized controlled trial on adults. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 3 (02) e42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Caban JJ, Gotz D. Visual analytics in healthcare–opportunities and research challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (02) 260-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Li I, Dey A, Forlizzi J. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, GA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010: 557-566
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Heer J, Shneiderman B. Interactive dynamics for visual analysis. Commun ACM 2012; 55: 45-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Tiase VL, Hull W, McFarland MM. et al. Patient-generated health data and electronic health record integration: a scoping review. JAMIA Open 2020; 3 (04) 619-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Kumar RB, Goren ND, Stark DE, Wall DP, Longhurst CA. Automated integration of continuous glucose monitor data in the electronic health record using consumer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (03) 532-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 North F, Chaudhry R. Apple HealthKit and health app: patient uptake and barriers in primary care. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22 (07) 608-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Mandel JC, Kreda DA, Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Ramoni RB. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (05) 899-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Gance-Cleveland B, Leiferman J, Aldrich H. et al. Using the technology acceptance model to develop StartSmart: mHealth for screening, brief intervention, and referral for risk and protective factors in pregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health 2019; 64 (05) 630-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Chung C-F, Dew K, Cole A. et al. Boundary negotiating artifacts in personal informatics: patient-provider collaboration with patient-generated data. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. San Francisco, CA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016: 770-786
    PubMed
  • 97 Marceglia S, Fontelo P, Rossi E, Ackerman MJ. A standards-based architecture proposal for integrating patient mHealth apps to electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (03) 488-505
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Lakshmi U, Hong M, Wilcox L. Integrating patient-generated observations of daily living into pediatric cancer care: a formative user interface design study. IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform 2018; 2018: 265-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Wu DTY, Xin C, Bindhu S. et al. Clinician perspectives and design implications in using patient-generated health data to improve mental health practices: mixed methods study. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4 (08) e18123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Huba N, Zhang Y. Designing patient-centered personal health records (PHRs): health care professionals' perspective on patient-generated data. J Med Syst 2012; 36 (06) 3893-3905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Chiauzzi E, Rodarte C, DasMahapatra P. Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions. BMC Med 2015; 13: 77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Cheng KG, Hayes GR, Hirano SH. et al. Challenges of integrating patient-centered data into clinical workflow for care of high-risk infants. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 2015; 19: 45-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Ozkaynak M, Reeder B, Park SY. et al. Design for improved workflow. In: Sasangohar F, Sethumadhavan A. eds. Design for Healthcare. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2020
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Ozkaynak M, Sircar CM, Frye O. et al. A systematic review of design workshops for health information technologies. Informatics (MDPI) 2021; 8: 34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Feller DJ, Burgermaster M, Levine ME. et al. A visual analytics approach for pattern-recognition in patient-generated data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (10) 1366-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Burgermaster M, Son JH, Davidson PG. et al. A new approach to integrating patient-generated data with expert knowledge for personalized goal setting: a pilot study. Int J Med Inform 2020; 139: 104158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Chung C-F. Supporting patient-provider communication and engagement with personal informatics data. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. Maui, HI: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017: 335-338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Chung C-F, Wang Q, Schroeder J. et al. Identifying and planning for individualized change: patient-provider collaboration using lightweight food diaries in healthy eating and irritable bowel syndrome. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2019; 3 (01) 7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Schroeder J, Hoffswell J, Chung C-F. et al. Supporting patient-provider collaboration to identify individual triggers using food and symptom journals. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Portland, OR: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017: 1726-1739
    PubMed
  • 110 Luo Y, Liu P, Choe EK. Co-designing food trackers with dietitians: identifying design opportunities for food tracker customization. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery; 2019: 592
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Weissmann J, Mueller A, Messinger D, Parkin CG, Amann-Zalan I. Improving the quality of outpatient diabetes care using an information management system: results from the observational VISION study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015; 10 (01) 76-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Bhutani S, Schoeller DA, Walsh MC, McWilliams C. Frequency of eating out at both fast-food and sit-down restaurants was associated with high body mass index in non-large metropolitan communities in Midwest. Am J Health Promot 2018; 32 (01) 75-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Eubanks V. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 114 Woods SS, Evans NC, Frisbee KL. Integrating patient voices into health information for self-care and patient-clinician partnerships: Veterans Affairs design recommendations for patient-generated data applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (03) 491-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Munson SA. Rethinking assumptions in the design of health and wellness tracking tools. Interaction 2017; 25: 62-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar