Design and Testing of a Smartphone Application for Real-Time Self-Tracking Diabetes Self-Management BehaviorsFunding This research was supported by the 2018 Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and the Arizona State University Research Acceleration Grant.
07. Februar 2018
24. April 2018
20. Juni 2018 (online)
Background Type 1 diabetes (T1D) care requires multiple daily self-management behaviors (SMBs). Preliminary studies on SMBs rely mainly on self-reported survey and interview data. There is little information on adult T1D SMBs, along with corresponding compensation techniques (CTs), gathered in real-time.
Objective The article aims to use a patient-centered approach to design iDECIDE, a smartphone application that gathers daily diabetes SMBs and CTs related to meal and alcohol intake and exercise in real-time, and contrast patients' actual behaviors against those self-reported with the app.
Methods Two usability studies were used to improve iDECIDE's functionality. These were followed by a 30-day pilot test of the redesigned app. A survey designed to capture diabetes SMBs and CTs was administered prior to the 30-day pilot test. Survey results were compared against iDECIDE logs.
Results Usability studies revealed that participants desired advanced features for self-tracking meals and alcohol intake. Thirteen participants recorded over 1,200 CTs for carbohydrates during the 30-day study. Participants also recorded 76 alcohol and 166 exercise CTs. Comparisons of survey responses and iDECIDE logs showed mean% (standard deviation) concordance of 77% (25) for SMBs related to meals, where concordance of 100% indicates a perfect match. There was low concordance of 35% (35) and 46% (41) for alcohol and exercise events, respectively.
Conclusion The high variability found in SMBs and CTs highlights the need for real-time diabetes self-tracking mechanisms to better understand SMBs and CTs. Future work will use the developed app to collect SMBs and CTs and identify patient-specific diabetes adherence barriers that could be addressed with individualized education interventions.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was reviewed by the Arizona State University and Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Boards.
- 1 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Estimate of diabetes and its burden on the United States; 2017. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf . Accessed September 9, 2017
- 2 World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes; 2016. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204871/9789241565257_eng.pdf;jsessionid=093AECB2B68112A20B0A35E226E8DECB?sequence=1 . Accessed April 9, 2018
- 3 Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J. , et al; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329 (14) 977-986
- 4 Laing SP, Swerdlow AJ, Slater SD. , et al. Mortality from heart disease in a cohort of 23,000 patients with insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetologia 2003; 46 (06) 760-765
- 5 Hendricks M, Monaghan M, Soutor S, Chen R, Holmes CS. A profile of self-care behaviors in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2013; 39 (02) 195-203
- 6 Weinger K, Butler HA, Welch GW, La Greca AM. Measuring diabetes self-care: a psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised with adults. Diabetes Care 2005; 28 (06) 1346-1352
- 7 Klupa T, Benbenek-Klupa T, Malecki M, Szalecki M, Sieradzki J. Clinical usefulness of a bolus calculator in maintaining normoglycaemia in active professional patients with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. J Int Med Res 2008; 36 (05) 1112-1116
- 8 Olinder AL, Nyhlin KT, Smide B. Clarifying responsibility for self-management of diabetes in adolescents using insulin pumps--a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67 (07) 1547-1557
- 9 Ritholz MD, Beverly EA, Weinger K. Digging deeper: the role of qualitative research in behavioral diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2011; 11 (06) 494-502
- 10 Hood M, Wilson R, Corsica J, Bradley L, Chirinos D, Vivo A. What do we know about mobile applications for diabetes self-management? A review of reviews. J Behav Med 2016; 39 (06) 981-994
- 11 Groat D, Grando MA, Soni H. , et al. Self-management behaviors in adults on insulin pump therapy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017; 11 (02) 233-239
- 12 Grando MA, Groat D, Soni H. , et al. Characterization of exercise and alcohol self-management behaviors of type 1 diabetes patients on insulin pump therapy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017; 11 (02) 240-246
- 13 Brzan PP, Rotman E, Pajnkihar M, Klanjsek P. Mobile applications for control and self management of diabetes: a systematic review. J Med Syst 2016; 40 (09) 210
- 14 Bellei EA, Biduski D, Cechetti NP, De Marchi ACB. Diabetes Mellitus m-Health Applications: A Systematic Review of Features and Fundamentals. Telemed E-Health. Available at: https://www.libertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/tmj.2017.0230 . Accessed April 10, 2018
- 15 Android. Android Studio. Available at: https://developer.android.com/studio/index.html . Accessed June 29, 2016
- 16 Lewis JR. Evaluation of procedures for adjusting problem-discovery rates estimated from small samples. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2001; 13 (04) 445-479
- 17 Virzi RA, Sorce JF, Herbert LB. A Comparison of Three Usability Evaluation Methods: Heuristic, Think-Aloud, and Performance Testing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 1993: 309-313
- 18 TechSmith. Morae. Available at: http://www.techsmith.com/morae.html . Accessed November 25, 2015
- 19 Ribomation AB. [email protected]. Available at: http://droid-at-screen.org/ . Accessed December 16, 2015
- 20 mHIMSS. Selecting a Mobile App: Evaluating the Usability of Medical Applications; 2012. Available at: http://www.himss.org/selecting-mobile-app-evaluating-usability-medical-applications-0?ItemNumber=28900 . Accessed September 26, 2017
- 21 Justinmind. Available at: http://www.justinmind.com . Accessed June 29, 2016
- 22 Groat D, Grando MA, Thompson B. , et al. A methodology to compare insulin dosing recommendations in real-life settings. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017; 11 (06) 1174-1182
- 23 Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2008; 24 (06) 574-594
- 24 United States Department of Agriculture Research Service. USDA Food Composition Database. Available at: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/ . Accessed April 27, 2017
- 25 Nutritionix. Nutritionix - Largest verified nutrition database. Nutritionix; 2017. Available at: https://www.nutritionix.com/ . Accessed June 5, 2017
- 26 Groat D, Soni H, Grando MA, Thompson B, Cook CB. Self-reported compensation techniques for carbohydrate, exercise, and alcohol behaviors in patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018; 12 (02) 412-414
- 27 O'Connell MA, Donath S, Cameron FJ. Poor adherence to integral daily tasks limits the efficacy of CSII in youth. Pediatr Diabetes 2011; 12 (06) 556-559
- 28 Beverly EA, Ganda OP, Ritholz MD. , et al. Look who's (not) talking: diabetic patients' willingness to discuss self-care with physicians. Diabetes Care 2012; 35 (07) 1466-1472
- 29 Ravert RD. Alcohol management strategies of college students with diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 77 (01) 97-102
- 30 Barnard KD, Dyson P, Sinclair JM. , et al. Alcohol health literacy in young adults with type 1 diabetes and its impact on diabetes management. Diabet Med 2014; 31 (12) 1625-1630
- 31 Pinsker JE, Kraus A, Gianferante D. , et al. Techniques for exercise preparation and management in adults with type 1 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2016; 40 (06) 503-508
- 32 Guilfoyle SM, Crimmins NA, Hood KK. Blood glucose monitoring and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: meter downloads versus self-report. Pediatr Diabetes 2011; 12 (06) 560-566
- 33 Brown III W, Yen P-Y, Rojas M, Schnall R. Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology. J Biomed Inform 2013; 46 (06) 1080-1087
- 34 Bastawrous A, Armstrong MJ. Mobile health use in low- and high-income countries: an overview of the peer-reviewed literature. J R Soc Med 2013; 106 (04) 130-142
- 35 Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (04) e104
- 36 Apple, Inc. Apple Developer: HealthKit; 2017. Available at: https://developer.apple.com/healthkit/ . Accessed April 26, 2017
- 37 American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2016 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes 2016; 34 (01) 3-21
- 38 Dinneen SF, O'Hara MC, Byrne M. , et al; Irish DAFNE Study Group. Group follow-up compared to individual clinic visits after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013; 100 (01) 29-38