PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2018; 09(02): 238-247
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641595
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Factors Affecting Acceptance of Hospital Information Systems Based on Extended Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study in Three Paraclinical Departments

Hamed Nadri
1   Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
,
Bahlol Rahimi
1   Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
,
Hadi Lotfnezhad Afshar
1   Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
,
Mahnaz Samadbeik
2   Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
,
Ali Garavand
3   Department of Management and Health Information Technology, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

29. Dezember 2017

28. Februar 2018

Publikationsdatum:
04. April 2018 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective Regardless of the acceptance of users, information and communication systems can be considered as a health intervention designed to improve the care delivered to patients. This study aimed to determine the adoption and use of the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2) by the users of hospital information system (HIS) in paraclinical departments including laboratory, radiology, and nutrition and to investigate the key factors of adoption and use of these systems.

Materials and Methods A standard questionnaire was used to collect the data from nearly 253 users of these systems in paraclinical departments of eight university hospitals in two different cities of Iran. A total of 202 questionnaires including valid responses were used in this study (105 in Urmia and 97 in Khorramabad). The data were processed using LISREL and SPSS software and statistical analysis technique was based on the structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results It was found that the original TAM constructs had a significant impact on the staffs' behavioral intention to adopt HIS in paraclinical departments. The results of this study indicated that cognitive instrumental processes (job relevance, output quality, result demonstrability, and perceived ease of use), except for result demonstrability, were significant predictors of intention to use, whereas the result revealed no significant relationship between social influence processes (subjective norm, voluntariness, and image) and the users' behavioral intention to use the system.

Conclusion The results confirmed that several factors in the TAM2 that were important in previous studies were not significant in paraclinical departments and in government-owned hospitals. The users' behavior factors are essential for successful usage of the system and should be considered. It provides valuable information for hospital system providers and policy makers in understanding the adoption challenges as well as practical guidance for the successful implementation of information systems in paraclinical departments.

Keywords

sociotechnical aspects of information technology - adoption - socio-organizational issues - laboratory information systems - radiology information systems

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at Urmia University of Medical Sciences and are in compliance with all ethical guidelines.


 

  • References

  • 1 Scott RE. e-Records in health--preserving our future. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (5-6): 427-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Coiera E. Guide to Health Informatics. New York: CRC Press; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Esmaeili M, Toloie EA, Pour EA, Rogheyeh E. Study on feasibility and acceptance of implementation of Technology Acceptance Model of Davis in staff of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Pajoohandeh J 2013; 18 (01) 40-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lu Y-C, Xiao Y, Sears A, Jacko JA. A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74 (05) 409-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ammenwerth E, Gräber S, Herrmann G, Bürkle T, König J. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges. Int J Med Inform 2003; 71 (2-3): 125-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vakilimofrad H. Hospital information system and its role in medical and health services development: a review. Pajouhan Sci J 2012; 11 (01) 12-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ward R. The application of technology acceptance and diffusion of innovation models in healthcare informatics. Health Policy Tech 2013; 2 (04) 222-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Winter A, Reinhold H, Elske A, Birgit B, Nils H, Franziska J. Health Information Systems. London: Springer; 2010: 33-42
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Haux R. Health information systems - past, present, future. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (3-4): 268-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wuri P, Handayani PIS, Hidayanto AN. , et al. Integrated hospital information system architecture design in Indonesia. In: Tiko I, Arthur T. , eds. Maximizing Healthcare Delivery and Management through Technology Integration. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global; 2016: 207-236
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nadri H, Rahimi B, Timpka T, Sedghi S. The top 100 articles in the medical informatics: a bibliometric analysis. J Med Syst 2017; 41 (10) 150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Amoako-Gyampah K, Salam AF. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf Manage 2004; 41 (06) 731-745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Agarwal R, Jayesh P. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis Sci 1997; 28 (03) 557-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zheng K, Padman R, Krackhardt D, Johnson MP, Diamond HS. Social networks and physician adoption of electronic health records: insights from an empirical study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17 (03) 328-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989; 35 (08) 982-1003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000; 46 (02) 186-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kripanont N. Examining a Technology Acceptance Model of Internet Usage by Academics within Thai Business Schools. (Doctoral dissertation); 2007. Available at: www.vuir.vu.edu.au/1512/1/Kripanont.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Schierz PG, Oliver S, Wirtz BW. Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: an empirical analysis. Electron Commerce Res Appl 2010; 9 (03) 209-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 D'Souza JM, Hunter I. Why should I?--acceptance of health information technology among health professionals. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 962
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Handayani PW, Hidayanto AN, Pinem AA, Hapsari IC, Sandhyaduhita PI, Budi I. Acceptance model of a hospital information system. Int J Med Inform 2017; 99: 11-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M. , et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 2012; 36 (01) 241-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (02) 115-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lai HM. Physician Acceptance Behavior of the Electronic Medical Records Exchange: An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior. PACIS 2013 Proceedings. 197. Available at: aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2013/197
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Strudwick G. Predicting nurses' use of healthcare technology using the technology acceptance model: an integrative review. Comput Inform Nurs 2015; 33 (05) 189-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Marangunić N, Andrina G. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers Access Inf Soc 2015; 14 (01) 81-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ducey AJ, Coovert MD. Predicting tablet computer use: an extended technology acceptance model for physicians. Health Policy Tech 2016; 5 (03) 268-284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Garavand A, Mohseni M, Asadi H, Etemadi M, Moradi-Joo M, Moosavi A. Factors influencing the adoption of health information technologies: a systematic review. Electron Physician 2016; 8 (08) 2713-2718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ologeanu-Taddei R, Morquin D, Domingo H, Bourret R. . 2015. Understanding the acceptance factors of an Hospital Information System: evidence from a French University Hospital. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2015:1001–1007
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 1989; 13 (03) 319-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Fishbein MA, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Aversano N. Technology Rejection of Mobile Telephones. Case Western Reserve University (doctoral dissertation); 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Taylor S, Peter T. Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. Manage Inf Syst Q 1995; 19 (04) 561-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pfeffer J. Organizations and Organization Theory. Boston, MA: Pitman; 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Wu M-Y, Chou H-P, Yung-Chien W, Yen-Han H. TAM-2 based study of website user behavior-using web 2.0 websites as an example. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ 2011; 4 (08) 133-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kieras D, Polson PG. An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Int J Man Mach Stud 1985; 22 (04) 365-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Polson PG. Interfacing thought: cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1987: 184-235
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Gold AH, Arvind M, Segars AH. Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. J Manage Inf Syst 2001; 18 (01) 185-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 1988; 16 (01) 74-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hsiao JL, Chang HC, Chen RF. A study of factors affecting acceptance of hospital information systems: a nursing perspective. J Nurs Res 2011; 19 (02) 150-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Tung F-C, Chang S-C, Chou C-M. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77 (05) 324-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Chen R-F, Hsiao J-L. An empirical study of physicians' acceptance of hospital information systems in Taiwan. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18 (02) 120-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Asua J, Orruño E, Reviriego E, Gagnon MP. Healthcare professional acceptance of telemonitoring for chronic care patients in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12 (01) 139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Tavakoli N, Jahanbakhsh M, Shahin A, Mokhtari H, Rafiei M. Electronic medical record in central polyclinic of Isfahan oil industry: a case study based on technology acceptance model. Acta Inform Med 2013; 21 (01) 23-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Yu P, Li H, Gagnon MP. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (04) 219-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Huang J-C. Innovative health care delivery system--a questionnaire survey to evaluate the influence of behavioral factors on individuals' acceptance of telecare. Comput Biol Med 2013; 43 (04) 281-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Wu J-H, Shen W-S, Lin L-M, Greenes RA, Bates DW. Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20 (02) 123-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath PA. Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: an application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics J 2012; 18 (02) 124-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Lehmann CU, Unertl KM, John RM, Lorenzi NM. Change management for the successful adoption of clinical information systems. In: Finnell JT, Dixon BE. , eds. Clinical Informatics Study Guide: Text and Review. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 435-456
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Maillet É, Mathieu L, Sicotte C. Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: an extension of the UTAUT. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (01) 36-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar