Synlett 2016; 27(11): 1715-1719
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1561934
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Sc(OTf)3-Catalyzed Addition of Bromomagnesium 2-Vinyloxy Ethoxide to Various Aldehydes Leading to Protected Aldol Products

Pauline Quinio
Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich, Department of Chemistry, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, 81377 München, Germany   Email: paul.knochel@cup.uni-muenchen.de
,
Laura Kohout
Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich, Department of Chemistry, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, 81377 München, Germany   Email: paul.knochel@cup.uni-muenchen.de
,
Daniela Sustac Roman
Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich, Department of Chemistry, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, 81377 München, Germany   Email: paul.knochel@cup.uni-muenchen.de
,
Jakob Gaar
Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich, Department of Chemistry, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, 81377 München, Germany   Email: paul.knochel@cup.uni-muenchen.de
,
Konstantin Karaghiosoff
Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich, Department of Chemistry, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, 81377 München, Germany   Email: paul.knochel@cup.uni-muenchen.de
,
Paul Knochel*
Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich, Department of Chemistry, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, 81377 München, Germany   Email: paul.knochel@cup.uni-muenchen.de
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 08 February 2016

Accepted: 04 March 2016

Publication Date:
17 March 2016 (online)


Abstract

The addition of bromomagnesium 2-vinyloxy ethoxide to various aldehydes in the presence of 10 mol% Sc(OTf)3 provides a broad range of functionalized protected aldol compounds. The enantioselective preparation of these aldols can be achieved via a Swern oxidation–CBS reduction sequence. Use of the dioxolane derived from 2-bromocyclohexanone provides the expected aldol product as the anti diastereoisomer (dr >99:1).

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 2a Haag B, Mosrin M, Ila H, Malakhov V, Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 9794
    • 2b Klatt T, Markiewicz JT, Sämann C, Knochel P. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 4253
    • 2c Dagousset G, François C, Leόn T, Blanc R, Sansiaume-Dagousset E, Knochel P. Synthesis 2014; 46: 3133
    • 3a Schmeichel M, Redlich H. Synthesis 1996; 1002
    • 3b Maier P, Redlich H. Synlett 2000; 257
    • 3c Iida H, Yamazaki N, Kibayashi C. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 4245
  • 4 Maier P, Redlich H, Richter J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005; 16: 3848
    • 5a Kobayashi S, Hachiya I, Ishitani H, Araki M. Synlett 1993; 472
    • 5b Kobayashi S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 15
    • 6a Kobayashi S, Hachiya I. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 3590
    • 6b Fukuzawa S.-i, Tsuchimoto T, Kanai T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994; 67: 2227
    • 6c Kobayashi S, Manabe K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002; 35: 209
    • 6d Kobayashi S, Sugiura M, Kitagawa H, Lam WW. L. Chem. Rev. 2002; 102: 2227
  • 7 Plancq B, Justafort LC, Lafantaisie M, Ollevier T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 6525
    • 8a Schneider U, Dao HT, Kobayashi S. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 2488
    • 8b Kitanosono T, Ollevier T, Kobayashi S. Chem. Asian J. 2013; 8: 3051
    • 8c Schneider U, Ueno M, Kobayashi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 13824
    • 8d Furuta K, Maruyama T, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 1041
    • 9a Krasovskiy A, Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 3333
    • 9b Krasovskiy A, Straub BF, Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 159
  • 10 Ketones were unreactive under the reaction conditions.
  • 11 Hydrolysis of the reaction mixture obtained after Mg insertion produces a 4:1 mixture of the cyclohexanone ketal and 2-(cyclohex-1-en-1-yloxy)ethan-1-ol, as well as traces of homocoupling (GC analysis).
  • 12 The structure was unambiguously assigned by X-ray crystallo­graphy.
    • 13a Omura K, Swern D. Tetrahedron 1978; 34: 1651
    • 13b Mancuso AJ, Huang S.-L, Swern D. J. Org. Chem. 1978; 43: 2480
  • 14 Corey EJ, Helal CJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998; 37: 1986
  • 15 For example, use of 2 M HCl, PTSA, or DOWEX 50W X8 led to either decomposition of the aldol product or no reaction.
  • 16 Fujioka H, Okitsu T, Sawama Y, Murata N, Li R, Kita Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 5930
  • 17 General All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere in flame-dried glassware. Syringes which were used to transfer anhydrous solvents or reagents were purged with argon prior to use. THF was continuously refluxed and freshly distilled from sodium benzophenone ketyl under nitrogen, then stored over MS 4 Å. Et2O was predried over CaH2 and further dried with the solvent purification system SPS-400-2 from Innovative Technologies Inc. and stored over MS 4 Å. Yields refer to isolated yields of compounds estimated to be >95% pure as determined by 1H NMR (25 °C) and capillary GC analysis. Chemical shifts are reported as δ values in ppm relative to the solvent peak. NMR spectra were recorded in a solution of CDCl3 (residual chloroform: δ = 7.27 ppm for 1H NMR and δ = 77.0 ppm for 13C NMR). Abbreviations for signal coupling are as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet; br, broad. Column chromatography was performed using SiO2 (0.040–0.063 mm, 230–400 mesh ASTM) from Merck. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of Alcohols of Type 4 (TP1) A dry and argon-flushed 10 mL Schlenk tube, equipped with a stirring bar and septum, was charged with 2-(vinyloxy)ethanol (5, 132 mg, 1.50 mmol, 1.50 equiv) in Et2O (1.5 mL). Then, i-PrMgBr (1.55 mmol, 1.55 equiv) was added dropwise at 25 °C. After 5 min of stirring, Sc(OTf)3 (49.2 mg, 0.10 mmol, 0.10 equiv) and aldehyde 6 (1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) were successively added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 40 °C for the given time. After a full conversion was detected by GC analysis, sat. aq NH4Cl (15 mL) was added, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Purification via column chromatography (SiO2) afforded expected products 4. 1-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)ethanol (4b) According to TP1, i-PrMgBr (1.91 mL, 1.55 mmol, 1.55 equiv) was added to a solution of 2-(vinyloxy)ethanol (5, 132 mg, 1.50 mmol, 1.50 equiv) in Et2O (1.5 mL). Then, Sc(OTf)3 (49.2 mg, 0.10 mmol, 0.10 equiv) and 2-bromobenzaldehyde (6b, 155 mg, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h at 40 °C. Purification by flash column chromatography (SiO2 loaded with i-hexane containing 2% Et3N; eluent: i-hexane–EtOAc = 6:4) afforded the desired product 4b (235 mg, 86%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.65 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.51 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.34 (td, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.12 (td, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.33 (dt, J = 9.5, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.12 (dd, J = 5.2, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.14–4.01 (m, 2 H), 3.98–3.87 (m, 2 H), 3.59 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.25 (ddd, J = 14.6, 3.8, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.95 (ddd, J = 14.6, 9.5, 5.2 Hz, 1 H) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 142.6, 132.6, 128.7, 127.6, 127.4, 121.4, 103.3, 69.3, 65.0, 64.8, 40.5 ppm. IR (diamond ATR, neat): ν = 3457, 3060, 2957, 2884, 1736, 1590, 1567, 1466, 1438, 1409, 1360, 1308, 1270, 1192, 1119, 1076, 1019 cm–1. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 44 (22), 73 (100), 77 (22), 87 (16), 116 (20), 181 (11), 183 (14), 184 (19), 186 (11), 274 (1). HRMS (EI): m/z [M+] for C11H13BrO3: 274.0048; found: 274.0027. 2-(1,3-Dioxolan-2-yl)-1-(3-fluorophenyl)ethanol (4c) According to TP1, i-PrMgBr (1.91 mL, 1.55 mmol, 1.55 equiv) was added to a solution of 2-(vinyloxy)ethanol (5, 132 mg, 1.50 mmol, 1.50 equiv) in Et2O (1.5 mL). Then, Sc(OTf)3 (49.2 mg, 0.10 mmol, 0.10 equiv) and 3-fluorobenzaldehyde (6c, 124 mg, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h at 40 °C. Purification by flash column chromatography (SiO2 loaded with i-hexane containing 2% Et3N; eluent: i-hexane–EtOAc = 7:3) afforded the desired product 4c (190 mg, 90%) as colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.33–7.26 (m, 1 H), 7.16–7.10 (m, 2 H), 6.95 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.09–4.97 (m, 2 H), 4.12–4.02 (m, 2 H), 3.96–3.86 (m, 2 H), 3.42 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.10 (ddd, J = 5.5, 4.3, 1.6 Hz, 2 H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 163.0 [d, 1J(C,F) = 246 Hz], 146.6 [d, 3J(C,F) = 7 Hz], 129.9 [d, 3J(C,F) = 8 Hz], 121.2 [d, 4J(C,F) = 3 Hz], 114.2 [d, 2J(C,F) = 21 Hz], 112.7 [d, 2J(C,F) = 22 Hz], 103.1, 69.7 [d, 4J(C,F) = 2 Hz], 65.0, 64.9, 42.3 ppm. 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –113.1. IR (diamond ATR, neat): ν = 3451, 2959, 2888, 1615, 1590, 1484, 1449, 1411, 1362, 1244, 1091, 1060, 1024 cm–1. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 43 (20), 44 (18), 45 (50), 73 (100), 87 (26), 95 (12), 97 (21), 194 (1). HRMS (EI): m/z [M+] for C11H13FO3: 212.0849; found: 194.0768 [M – H2O]+. 1-(2-Chloro-6-fluorophenyl)-2-(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)ethanol (4d) According to TP1, i-PrMgBr (1.91 mL, 1.55 mmol, 1.55 equiv) was added to a solution of 2-(vinyloxy)ethanol (5, 132 mg, 1.50 mmol, 1.50 equiv) in Et2O (1.5 mL). Then, Sc(OTf)3 (49.2 mg, 0.10 mmol, 0.10 equiv) and 2-chloro-6-fluorobenzaldehyde (6d, 158 mg, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at 40 °C. Purification by flash column chromatography (SiO2 loaded with i-hexane containing 2% Et3N; eluent: i-hexane–EtOAc = 1:4) afforded the desired product 4d (215 mg, 87%) as colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.23–7.13 (m, 2 H), 6.99 (ddd, J = 10.9, 7.1, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.54 (ddd, J = 9.7, 6.0, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.10 (t, J = 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.09–3.99 (m, 2 H), 3.96–3.84 (m, 2 H), 3.09 (dd, J = 6.1, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.53 (dddd, J = 14.4, 9.7, 4.7, 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.12 (dt, J = 14.5, 4.0 Hz, 1 H) ppm. 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –113.1 ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.9 [d, 1J(C,F) = 240 Hz], 133.6 [d, 3J(C,F) = 7 Hz], 129.3 [d, 3J(C,F) = 11 Hz], 128.4 [d, 2J(C,F) = 13 Hz], 125. 8, 115.1 [d, 2J(C,F) = 15 Hz], 102.9, 66.1 [d, 3J(C,F) = 1 Hz], 65.0, 64.8, 39.3 [d, 4J(C,F) = 3 Hz]. IR (diamond ATR, neat): ν = 3452, 3083, 2963, 2886, 1604, 1575, 1454, 1411, 1360, 1317, 1239, 1189, 1174, 1132, 1067, 1024 cm–1. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 45 (17), 73 (100), 159 (14), 228 (4). HRMS (EI): m/z [M+] for C11H12ClFO3: 246.0459; found: 228.0349 [M – H2O]+.