Triangulenium Ions: Versatile Organic Photoredox Catalysts for Green-Light-Mediated Reactions

Abstract

The development of tunable organic photoredox catalysts remains important in the field of photoredox catalysis. A highly modular and tunable family of trianguleniums (azadioxatriangulenium, diazaoxatriangulenium, and triazatriangulenium), and the related [4]helicene quinacridinium have been used as organic photoredox catalysts for photoreductions and photooxidations under visible light irradiation (λ = 518–640 nm). A highlight of this family of photoredox catalysts is their readily tunable redox properties, leading to different reactivities. We report their use as photocatalysts for the aerobic oxidative hydroxylation of arylboronic acids and the aerobic cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction of N-phenyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydroisoquinoline with nitromethane through reductive quenching. Furthermore, their potential as photoreduction catalysts has been demonstrated through the catalysis of an intermolecular atom-transfer radical addition via oxidative quenching. These transformations serve as benchmarks to highlight that the easily synthesized trianguleniums, congeners of the acridiniums, are versatile organic photoredox catalysts with applications in both photooxidations and photoreductions.

Key words

photoredox organocatalysis - trianguleniums - photoreduction - photooxidation - heterocyclic fused cationic compounds

Publication History

Received: 02 June 2023

Accepted after revision: 26 June 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 June 2023

Article published online:
18 September 2023

• References and Notes

• 1a McAtee RC, McClain EJ, Stephenson CR. J. Trends Chem. 2019; 1: 111
• 1b Blakemore DC, Castro L, Churcher I, Rees DC, Thomas AW, Wilson DM, Wood A. Nat. Chem. 2018; 10: 383
• 2a Candish L, Collins KD, Cook GC, Douglas JJ, Gómez-Suárez A, Jolit A, Keess S. Chem. Rev. 2022; 122: 2907
• 2b Twilton J, Le C, Zhang P, Shaw MH, Evans RW, MacMillan DW. C. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017; 1: 0052
• 2c Marzo L, Pagire SK, Reiser O, König B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 10034
• 3a Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
• 3b Narayanam JM. R, Tucker JW, Stephenson CR. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 8756
• 3c Nicewicz DA, MacMillan DW. C. Science 2008; 322: 77
• 3d Ischay MA, Anzovino ME, Du J, Yoon TP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 12886
• 4a Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10075
• 4b Vega-Peñaloza A, Mateos J, Companyó X, Escudero-Casao M, Dell’Amico L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 1082
• 4c Bortolato T, Cuadros S, Simionato G, Dell’Amico L. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 1263
• 5a Mandigma MJ. P, Kaur J, Barham JP. ChemCatChem 2023; 11: e202201542
• 5b Hoffmann N. J. Photochem. Photobiol., C 2008; 9: 43
• 5c Amos SG. E, Garreau M, Buzzetti L, Waser J. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020; 16: 1163
• 5d Schmalzbauer M, Ghosh I, König B. Faraday Discuss. 2019; 215: 364
• 5e Holmberg-Douglas N, Nicewicz DA. Chem. Rev. 2022; 122: 1925
• 6 Alfonzo E, Alfonso FS, Beeler AB. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 2989
• 7 Ohkubo K, Kobayashi T, Fukuzumi S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 8652
• 8a Kotani H, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 15999
• 8b Fukuzumi S, Kotani H, Ohkubo K, Ogo S, Tkachenko NV, Lemmetyinen H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 1600
• 9 Joshi-Pangu A, Lévesque F, Roth HG, Oliver SF, Campeau L.-C, Nicewicz D, DiRocco DA. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 7244
• 10 White A, Wang L, Nicewicz D. Synlett 2019; 30: 827
• 11 Fischer C, Kerzig C, Zilate B, Wenger OS, Sparr C. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 210
• 12a Singh PP, Singh J, Srivastava V. RSC Adv. 2023; 13: 10958
• 12b Zilate B, Fischer C, Sparr C. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 1767
• 13a Hossain MM, Shaikh AC, Moutet J, Gianetti TL. Nat. Synth. 2022; 1: 147
• 13b Hossain MM, Gianetti TL. Trends Chem. 2022; 4: 962
• 14a Laursen BW, Krebs FC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 3432
• 14b Bosson J, Bisballe N, Laursen BW, Lacour J. In Helicenes: Synthesis, Properties and Applications, Chap. 4. Crassous J, Stará IG, Starýl I. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2022: 127
• 15a Mei L, Veleta JM, Gianetti TL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 12056
• 15b Mei L, Gianetti TL. Synlett 2021; 32: 337
• 15c Mei L, Moutet J, Stull SM, Gianetti TL. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 10640
• 15d Stull SM, Mei L, Gianetti TL. Synlett 2022; 33: 1194
• 15e Shaikh AC, Hossain MM, Kaur R, Moutet J, Kumar A, Thompson B, Huxter VM, Gianetti TL. ChemRxiv 2022; preprint DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-6qpb8-v2.
• 16a Laursen BW, Krebs FC. Chem. Eur. J. 2001; 7: 1773
• 16b Bosson J, Gouin J, Lacour J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 2824
• 17a Sørensen TJ, Madsen A. Ø, Laursen BW. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 6391
• 17b Lemke S, Ulrich S, Claußen F, Bloedorn A, Jung U, Herges R, Magnussen OM. Surf. Sci. 2015; 632: 71
• 18 Jensen JD, Bisballe N, Kacenauskaite L, Thomsen MS, Chen J, Hammerich O, Laursen BW. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 17002
• 19a Dileesh S, Gopidas KR. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2004; 162: 115
• 19b Noguchi H, Hirose T, Yokoyama S, Matsuda K. CrystEngComm 2016; 18: 7377
• 19c Thyrhaug E, Sørensen TJ, Gryczynski I, Gryczynski Z, Laursen BW. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013; 117: 2160
• 20 Zou Y.-Q, Chen J.-R, Liu X.-P, Lu L.-Q, Davis RL, Jørgensen KA, Xiao W.-J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 784
• 21 Pitre SP, McTiernan CD, Ismaili H, Scaiano JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 13286
• 22a Barbante GJ, Kebede N, Hindson CM, Doeven EH, Zammit EM, Hanson GR, Hogan CF, Francis PS. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 14026
• 22b Pavlishchuk VV, Addison AW. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000; 298: 97
• 23 Wood PM. FEBS Lett. 1974; 44: 22
• 24a Pitre SP, McTiernan CD, Scaiano JC. ACS Omega 2016; 1: 66
• 24b Huang L, Zhao J. RSC Adv. 2013; 3: 23377
• 24c Bartling H, Eisenhofer A, König B, Gschwind RM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 11860
• 24d Condie AG, González-Gómez JC, Stephenson CR. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 1464
• 25 Xia Q, Li Y, Wang X, Dai P, Deng H, Zhang W.-H. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 7290
• 26 Kosower EM, Mohammad M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971; 93: 2713
• 27 Wayner DD. M, McPhee DJ, Griller D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 132
• 28 PC-Catalyzed Oxidative Hydroxylation of (4-Cyanophenyl)boronic Acid under Visible Light (Table [2]); General Procedure (4-Cyanophenyl)boronic acid (37 mg, 0.25 mmol) and the appropriate PC (3 mg, 6 μmol, 2.5 mol%) were dissolved in DMF (2.5 mL) in a 25 mL Schlenk tube, and DIPEA (90 μL, 0.5 mmol, 2 equiv) was added. The solution was stirred at rt under LED irradiation, open to the atmosphere. After 22 h, the solution was cooled to 0 °C, and the reaction was quenched by the addition of 1 M aq HCl (10 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with Et₂O (3 × 10 mL) and the combined organic phases were washed with sat. aq NaCl (2 × 10 mL) and dried (MgSO₄). The solvent was removed in vacuo to give a crude product. The yield was determined by ¹H NMR analysis with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (1 equiv) as the internal standard. 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.59–7.51 (m, 2 H, ArH), 6.97–6.89 (m, 2 H, ArH), 6.31 (bs, 1 H, ArOH). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 160.0 (CN), 134.5 (ArC), 119.3 (ArC), 116.6 (ArC), 103.6 (ArC).
• 29 APC-Catalyzed Aerobic Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction of N-Phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline with Nitromethane under Visible Light (Table [3]); General Procedure N-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (21 mg, 0.1 mmol) and the appropriate PC (1 mg, 2.5 μmol, 2.5 mol%) were dissolved in MeNO₂ (1 mL) in a 25 mL Schlenk tube, and the solution was stirred at rt under LED irradiation, open to the atmosphere. After 4.5 h, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo to furnish a crude product. The yield was determined by ¹H NMR analysis with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (1 equiv) as the internal standard. 1-(Nitromethyl)-2-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.30–7.24 (m, 3 H, ArH), 7.24–7.18 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.15–7.12 (m, 1 H, ArH), 7.01–6.97 (m, 2 H, ArH), 6.86 (tt, J ₁ = 7.3, J ₂ = 1.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 5.56 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H, CH), 4.89 (dd, J ₁ = 11.9, J ₂ = 7.8 Hz, 1 H, ½ × CH ₂NO₂), 4.57 (dd, J = 11.9, 6.6 Hz, ½ × CH ₂NO₂ 1 H), 3.71–3.60 (m, 2 H, CH ₂), 3.13–3.05 (m, 1 H, ½ × CH ₂), 2.85–2.77 (m, 1 H, ½ × CH ₂). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 148.5 (ArC), 135.4 (ArC), 133.0 (ArC), 129.7 (ArC), 129.3 (ArC), 128.3 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 126.9 (ArC), 119.7 (ArC), 115.3 (ArC), 78.9 (CH₂NO₂), 58.4 (CHN), 42.4 (CH₂), 26.6 (CH₂).
• 30 PC-Catalyzed Intermolecular Atom-Transfer Radical Addition between 4-Nitrobenzyl Bromide and Styrene under Visible Light (Table [4]); General Procedure iAn oven-dried 25 mL Schlenk tube was charged with 4-nitrobenzyl bromide (43 mg, 0.2 mmol), LiBr (35 mg, 0.4 mmol, 2 equiv), and the appropriate PC (1 mg, 2 μmol, 1 mol%). The tube was evacuated and refilled with N₂ (×3) before anhyd degassed MeCN (1 mL) and styrene (0.23 mL, 2 mmol, 10 equiv) were added under a positive flow of N₂, and the tube was sealed. The solution was freeze–pump–thaw degassed (3×), then refilled with N₂. The solution was then stirred at rt under LED irradiation for 22 h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to furnish the crude product. The yield was determined by ¹H NMR analysis using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (1 equiv) as the internal standard. 1-(3-Bromo-3-phenylpropyl)-4-nitrobenzene ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.18–8.14 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.40–7.29 (m, 7 H, ArH), 4.87 (dd, J₁ = 8.7, J ₂ = 6.1 Hz, 1 H, CHBr), 3.00–2.91 (m, 1 H, ½ × CH ₂), 2.85–2.78 (m, 1 H, ½ × CH ₂), 2.69–2.57 (m, 1 H, ½ × CH ₂), 2.51–2.40 (m, 1 H, ½ × CH ₂). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 148.4 (ArC), 146.8 (ArC), 141.6 (ArC), 129.5 (ArC), 129.0 (ArC), 128.8 (ArC), 127.4 (ArC), 124.0 (ArC), 54.1 (CHBr), 40.9 (CH₂), 34.3 (CH₂).
• 31a Hernández Delgado I, Pascal S, Wallabregue A, Duwald R, Besnard C, Guénée L, Nançoz C, Vauthey E, Tovar RC, Lunkley JL, Muller G, Lacour J. Chem. Sci. 2016; 7: 4685
• 31b Frédéric L, Fabri B, Guénée L, Zinna F, Di Bari L, Lacour J. Chem. Eur. J. 2022; 28: e202201853
• 31c Delgado IH, Pascal S, Besnard C, Voci S, Bouffier L, Sojic N, Lacour J. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 10186