Synlett 2023; 34(20): 2476-2480
DOI: 10.1055/a-2117-8816
cluster
Special Issue Dedicated to Prof. Hisashi Yamamoto

Switching Regioselectivity in the Asymmetric Bromocyclization of Difluoroalkenes Catalyzed by a Chiral Bisphosphine Oxide

Yuki Nakahara
,
Ryo Hirokawa
,
Shotaro Uchida
,
Kenji Yamashita
,
Yoshitaka Hamashima
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Nos. 21K14631 and 23K13750), Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovering and Life Science Research (BINDS) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Number JP19am0101099 (K.Y.), and The Research Foundation for Pharmaceutical Sciences under Grant Number 22-579 (K.Y.).


Dedicated to Professor Hisashi Yamamoto on the occasion of his 80th birthday

Abstract

We present an efficient approach for the enantioselective synthesis of difluoromethylene-containing oxazine compounds through 6-endo-selective bromocyclization of difluoroalkenes by using a chiral proton-bridged bisphosphine oxide complex as a catalyst precursor. The regioselectivity is significantly influenced by the solvent and the catalyst structure, and 6-endo cyclization products can be obtained preferentially with moderate to high enantioselectivity. This protocol offers complementary regioselectivity to our previously reported 5-exo-selective reaction, permitting the synthesis of diverse medicinally interesting compounds.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 21 April 2023

Accepted after revision: 26 June 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 June 2023

Article published online:
09 August 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Purser S, Moore PR, Swallow S, Gouverneur V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008; 37: 320
    • 1b Wang J, Sánchez-Roselló M, Aceña JL, del Pozo C, Sorochinsky AE, Fustero S, Soloshonok VA, Liu H. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 2432
    • 1c Gillis EP, Eastman KJ, Hill MD, Donnelly DJ, Meanwell NA. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 58: 8315
    • 1d Zhou Y, Wang J, Gu Z, Wang S, Zhu W, Aceña JL, Soloshonok VA, Izawa K, Liu H. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 422
    • 1e Inoue M, Sumii Y, Shibata N. ACS Omega 2020; 5: 10633
    • 2a Lapierre J, Ahmed V, Chen M.-J, Ispahany M, Guillemette JG, Taylor SD. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004; 14: 151
    • 2b Meanwell NA. J. Med. Chem. 2011; 54: 2529
    • 2c Zhou Q, Ruffoni A, Gianatassio R, Fujiwara Y, Sella E, Shabat D, Baran PS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 3949
    • 2d Ivanova MV, Bayle A, Besset T, Pannecoucke X, Poisson T. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 10284
    • 2e Meanwell NA. J. Med. Chem. 2018; 61: 5822
  • 3 Ambizas EM, Ginzburg R. Ann. Pharmacother. 2007; 41: 957
  • 4 Toschi L, Finocchiaro G, Bartolini S, Gioia V, Cappuzzo F. Future Oncol. 2005; 1: 7
  • 5 Frampton JE, Moen MD. Drugs 2010; 70: 1283
    • 6a Liu Y.-L, Yu J.-S, Zhou J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2013; 2: 194
    • 6b Yu J.-S, Liao F.-M, Gao W.-M, Liao K, Zuo R.-L, Zhou J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 7381
    • 6c Rong M.-Y, Li J.-S, Zhou Y, Zhang F.-G, Ma J.-A. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 9010
    • 6d Liu J, Yu L, Zheng C, Zhao G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 23641
    • 6e Uno H, Kawai K, Araki T, Shiro M, Shibata N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022; 61: e202117635
    • 7a Miller E, Kim S, Gibson K, Derrick JS, Toste FD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 8946
    • 7b Miller E, Mai BK, Read JA, Bell WC, Derrick JS, Liu P, Toste FD. ACS Catal. 2022; 12: 12369
  • 8 Yamashita K, Hirokawa R, Ichikawa M, Hisanaga T, Nagao Y, Takita R, Watanabe K, Kawato Y, Hamashima Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022; 144: 3913
  • 9 Hirokawa R, Nakahara Y, Uchida S, Yamashita K, Hamashima Y. Chem. Asian J. 2023; e202300141
  • 10 (5S)-5-Bromo-6,6-difluoro-2-phenyl-5-(p-tolyl)-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-oxazine (4a):Typical ProcedurePrecatalyst 1e (12.9 mg, 0.010 mmol, 10 mol%) and difluoroalkene 2a (28.7 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were placed in a well-dried Schlenk test tube under an argon atmosphere and dissolved in anhyd toluene (1.8 mL) and CH2Cl2 (0.2 mL). The mixture was cooled to –50 °C, and NBP (33.9 mg, 0.15 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added. The mixture was stirred for 48 h at –50 °C, and then the reaction was quenched by adding a 1.5 M solution of butyl vinyl ether in MeOH (1.0 mL, precooled to –78 °C) through a cannula. The mixture was then gradually warmed to rt and diluted with brine (5.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined extracts were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure, and the residue was subjected to 1H NMR analysis to determine the regioisomeric ratio. The crude product was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (100:0 to 9:1)] to give a white solid; yield: 32.4 mg (88%, 3a/4a = 1:7.2, 86% ee); mp 103–104 °C; [α]D 20 = –0.8 [c 1.00, CHCl3, 86% ee, (S)].HPLC (Method 1) [IJ-3, hexane–i-PrOH (99:1), flow rate 1.0 mL/min, column temp. 40 °C, λ = 254 nm]: t R = 13.2 min (minor, R), 14.5 min (major, S); (Method 2) [OD-H, hexane/i-PrOH (99.5:0.5), flow rate 1.0 mL/min, column temp. 40 °C, λ = 254 nm]: t R = 6.5 min (major, S), 6.9 min (minor, R). IR (neat): 2919, 1674, 1448, 1353, 1234, 1149, 1084, 1054 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.99–7.98 (m, 2 H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.44–7.41 (m, 2 H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 4.61 (dt, J = 17.8, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.52 (dt, J = 17.8, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.36 (s, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 150.8, 139.7, 132.2, 131.9, 130.1, 129.3 (2 C), 128.4 (2 C), 127.8 (2 C), 127.6 (2 C), 120.9 (t, J = 261.7 Hz), 56.7 (t, J = 26.9 Hz), 56.1, 21.1. 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –74.9 (br, 2 F).The spectral data for 4a were consistent with those reported in ref. 7a