Medical Student Appraisal

Summary

Background: Medical students are often afforded the privilege of counselling patients. In the past resources were limited to pen and paper or anatomic models. The evolution of mobile applications allows for limitless access to resources that facilitate bedside patient education.

Objectives: To evaluate the utility of six applications in patient education and promote awareness of implementing mobile resources in clinical care.

Methods: Six medical students rotating on various clerkships evaluated a total of six mobile applications. Strengths, limitations, and suggested uses in clinical care were identified. Applications included Meditoons^TM, VisiblePatient^TM, DrawMD^TM, CardioTeach^TM, Visual Anatomy^TM, and 360° Patient Education Suite^TM. Data was generated from narrative responses supplied by each student during their evaluation period.

Results: Bedside teaching was enhanced by professional illustrations and animations depicting anatomy and pathophysiology. Impromptu teaching was facilitated, as resources were conveniently available on a student’s smartphone or tablet. The ability to annotate and modify images and subsequently email to patients was an extraordinary improvement in provider-patient communication. Universal limitations included small smartphone screens and the novelty of new technology.

Discussion: Mobile applications have the potential to greatly enhance patient education and simultaneously build rapport. Endless opportunities exist for their integration in clinical practice, particularly for new diagnoses, consent for procedures, and at time of discharge. Providers should be encouraged to try new applications and utilize them with patients.

Citation: Markman TM, Sampognaro PJ, Mitchell SL, Weeks SR, Khalifian S, Dattilo JR. Medical student appraisal: Applications for bedside patient education. Appl Clin Inf 2013; 4: 201–211

http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-01-R-0007

Keywords

Application - mobile health - electronics - smartphone - patient education

 

Conflicts Of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this research.

• References

• 1 Greene JA. Releasing the Flood Waters: Diuril and the Reshaping of Hypertension. Bull Hist Med 2005; 79: 749-794. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2005.0153
• 2 Miller KH, Ziegler C, Greenberg R, Patel PD, Carter MB. Why physicians should share PDA/smartphone findings with their patients: A brief report. J Health Commun 2012; 17: 54-61. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.649102
• 3 Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: A review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012: 14. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1994
• 4 Pearlswan Communications LLC. Meditoons, version 2.0. 2012. Accessed January 3, 2013. Available at: http://www.meditoons.com
• 5 Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD).. The Visible Patient, version 0.3. 2010. Accessed January 3, 2013. Available at: http://visiblepatient.eu
• 6 Visible Health.. DrawMD, version 2.6.575. 2013. Accessed January 3, 2013. Available at: http://www. drawmd.com
• 7 Boston Scientific Corporation.. CardioTeach for iPad, version 2.0. 2013. Accessed January 3, 2013. Available at: http://www.bostonscientific.com/cardiac-rhythm-resources/campaign/CardioTeach.html
• 8 Education Mobile.. Visual Anatomy-Free, version 3.1. 2012. Accessed January 3, 2013. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/imagemagicstudio
• 9 Indendant LLC. 360 Patient Education Suite, version 1.10. 2012. Accessed January 3, 2013. Available at: http://incendant.com
• 10 Hogan NM, Kerin MJ. Smart phone apps: Smart patients, steer clear. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 89: 360-361. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.07.016
• 11 Visser BJ, Buijink AWH. Need to peer-review medical applications for smart phones. J Telemed Telecare. 2012: 18. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2011.110205