Appl Clin Inform 2012; 03(02): 164-174
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-11-RA-0070
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Assessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9)

P.D. Stetson
1  Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University
2  Department of Medicine, Columbia University
,
S. Bakken
1  Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University
3  School of Nursing, Columbia University
,
J.O. Wrenn
4  Department of Medical Informatics, Vanderbilt University
,
E.L. Siegler
4  Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Weill Cornell Medical College
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Correspondence to:

Peter D. Stetson, MD, MA
Columbia University Medical Center
650 West 168th Street
BB2–239
New York, NY 10032
Phone: 212.342.0029   

Publication History

received: 21 November 2011

accepted: 29 March 2012

Publication Date:
16 December 2017 (online)

 

Summary

Objective: To refine the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI) and test the validity and reliability of the 9-item version (PDQI-9).

Methods: Three sets each of admission notes, progress notes and discharge summaries were evaluated by two groups of physicians using the PDQI-9 and an overall general assessment: one gold standard group consisting of program or assistant program directors (n = 7), and the other of attending physicians or chief residents (n = 24). The main measures were criterion-related validity (correlation coefficients between Total PDQI-9 scores and 1-item General Impression scores for each note), discriminant validity (comparison of PDQI-9 scores on notes rated as best and worst using 1-item General Impression score), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha), and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)).

Results: The results were criterion-related validity (r = –0.678 to 0.856), discriminant validity (best versus worst note, t = 9.3, p = 0.003), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alphas = 0.87–0.94), and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.83, CI = 0.72–0.91).

Conclusion: The results support the criterion-related and discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability, and inter-rater reliability of the PDQI-9 for rating the quality of electronic physician notes. Tools for assessing note redundancy are required to complement use of PDQI-9. Trials of the PDQI-9 at other institutions, of different size, using different EHRs, and incorporating additional physician specialties and notes of other healthcare providers are needed to confirm its generaliz-ability.


#

 


#

Conflicts of interest

None


Correspondence to:

Peter D. Stetson, MD, MA
Columbia University Medical Center
650 West 168th Street
BB2–239
New York, NY 10032
Phone: 212.342.0029