Abstract
The indium-mediated reaction of phthaloyl-protected α-amino aldehydes 1 -4 with methyl 2-(bromomethyl)acrylate in aqueous solvents was investigated. The homoallyl alcohols 5 -8 were formed in 72-89% yields, the anti -isomers being the major diastereoisomers (dr 45:55-18:82). Acid-catalyzed esterification (H2 SO4 in Et2 O) led to α-methylene γ-butyrolactones 9 ,10 with yields ranging from 88 to 99%. Conjugate addition of cyanide and thiophenolate led to the addition products with improved selectivities compared with additions to carbamate-protected substrates. During the conjugate addition of a cuprate, a trapping of the intermediate enolate by a phthaloyl carbonyl group occurred, leading to tetracycle 11 in 57% yield. The configuration of all diastereoisomers could be established by three X-ray crystallographic analyses and by NMR spectroscopy.
Key Words
allylation - indium - Michael additions - α-amino aldehydes - α-methylene γ-butyrolactones
References
1
Blomberg C.
The Barbier Reaction and Related One-Step Processes
Springer;
Heidelberg:
1994.
2a
Lubineau A.
Augé J.
Queneau Y.
Synthesis
1994,
741
2b
Cintas P.
Synlett
1995,
1087
2c
Li C.-J.
Tetrahedron
1996,
52:
5643
2d
Li C.-J.
Chan T.-H.
Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media
Wiley-Interscience;
New York:
1997.
2e
Lubineau A.
Augé J.
Queneau Y. In
Organic Synthesis in Water
Grieco PA.
Blackie Academic;
London:
1998.
p.102
2f
Paquette LA. In
Green Chemistry. Frontiers in Benign Chemical Syntheses and Processes
Anastas PT.
Williamson TC.
Oxford University Press;
Oxford:
1998.
p.250
2g
Hashmi ASK.
J. Prakt. Chem.
1998,
340:
84
2h
Lainé D.
Synlett
1999,
1331
2i
Lubineau A.
Augé J.
Top. Curr. Chem.
1999,
206:
1
2j
Loh T.-P.
Huang J.-M.
Xu K.-C.
Goh S.-H.
Vittal JJ.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2000,
41:
6511
3a
Steurer S.
Podlech J.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
1999,
1551
3b
Steurer S.
Podlech J.
Org. Lett.
1999,
1:
481
3c
Steurer S.
Podlech J.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2001,
343:
251
3d
Steurer S.
Podlech J.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2002,
899
3e For the original publication of this method see: Öhler E.
Reininger K.
Schmidt U.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1970,
9:
457 ; Angew.Chem. 1970 , 82 , 480
3f Independent work was published by: Paquette LA.
Mitzel TM.
Isaac MB.
Crasto CF.
Schomer WW.
J. Org. Chem.
1997,
62:
4293
4a
Hanessian S.
Park H.
Yang R.-Y.
Synlett
1997,
351
4b
Hanessian S.
Park H.
Yang R.-Y.
Synlett
1997,
353
4c See also: Kurihara K.
Sugimoto T.
Saitoh Y.
Igarashi Y.
Hirota H.
Moriyama Y.
Tsuyuki T.
Takahashi T.
Khuong-Huu Q.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1985,
58:
3337
4d An overview over dibenzyl-protected amino aldehydes is given in: Reetz MT.
Chem. Rev.
1999,
99:
1121
5
Podlech J.
Gurrath M.
Müller G.
Lohof E. In
Houben-Weyl
E22:
Goodman M.
Felix A.
Moroder L.
Toniolo C.
Georg Thieme Verlag;
Stuttgart:
2001.
p.41
6
Lewis N.
McKillop A.
Taylor RJK.
Watson RJ.
Synth. Commun.
1995,
25:
561
7
Karrer P.
Portmann P.
Suter M.
Helv. Chim. Acta
1948,
31:
1617
8
Neidlein R.
Greulich P.
Kramer W.
Helv. Chim. Acta
1993,
76:
2407
9a
Dess DB.
Martin JC.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991,
113:
7277
9b
Soucek M.
Urban J.
Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.
1995,
60:
693
9c A detailed procedure is given in Ref.
[3a ]
10
Cassady JM.
Howie GA.
Robinson JM.
Stamos IK.
Organic Syntheses, Coll. Vol. 7
Wiley;
New York:
1990.
p.319
11 The respective isomers could be separated by medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC). All new compounds gave satisfactory spectroscopic data (NMR, IR, MS, [α]D
20 and elemental analyses).
12
Roush WR. In
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis
Vol. 2:
Trost BM.
Fleming I.
Heathcock CH.
Pergamon;
Oxford:
1991.
p.1
13 Crystal data for 11a : C24 H35 NO4 Si, M = 429.62 g/mol, orthorhombic, space group P21 21 21 . a = 10.009(2), b = 12.223(2), c = 20.057(3) Å, V = 2453.8(7) Å3 , Z = 4, Dc = 1.163 Mg/m3 , µ (Mo-Kα ) = 0.123 mm-1 , F(000) = 928. Data (2735 collected reflections, and 2063 unique reflections [I > 2σ(I)]) were measured on a Nicolet P3 diffractometer with Mo-Kα radiation (graphite monochromator) using 2θ-ω-scans at 293(2) K. The structure was solved by direct methods and the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically by full-matrix least-squares based on F2 to give the agreement factors R1 = 0.0597, ωR2 = 0.1289. Computations were carried out using the SHELXTLTM program. Crystallographic data have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication no. CCDC-179132 (8a ), CCDC-179133 (9a ), and CCDC-179131 (11a ). Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, (UK), fax:+44(1223)336033 or email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
14
Fürstner A.
Shi N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996,
118:
2533
15
Baldwin JE.
Adlington RM.
Sweeney JB.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1986,
27:
5423
16
Ciapetti P.
Taddei M.
Ulivi P.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1994,
35:
3183
17
Kempf DJ.
J. Org. Chem.
1986,
51:
3921
18a
Griesbeck AG.
Kramer W.
Bartoschek A.
Schmickler H.
Org. Lett.
2001,
3:
537
18b See also: Viscontini M.
Kaiser W.
Helv. Chim. Acta
1965,
48:
1927
19
Mertens A.
Zilch H.
König B.
Schäfer W.
Poll T.
Kampe W.
Seidel H.
Leser U.
Leinert H.
J. Med. Chem.
1993,
36:
2526