Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787979
Training in Public Health Informatics and Technology Leveraging a Multi-institutional Partnership Model and Emphasizing Experiential Learning
- Abstract
- Background and Significance
- Context and Approach
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Clinical Relevance Statement
- Multiple-Choice Questions
- References
Abstract
Background and Objective Though public health is an information-intense profession, there is a paucity of workforce with Public Health Informatics and Technology (PHIT) skills, which was evident during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This need is addressed through the PHIT workforce program (2021–2025) by the Office of the National Coordinator for training and to increase racial and ethnic diversity in the PHIT workforce. The objective is to share details on the Training in Informatics for Underrepresented Minorities in Public Health (TRIUMPH) consortium, funded by the PHIT workforce program.
Methods The TRIUMPH consortium is a collaboration between academic and practice partners with a commitment to training 879 students in PHIT. The Schools of Public Health and Nursing at the University of Minnesota, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health at Georgia Southern University, Morehouse School of Medicine, and Public Health Informatics Institute offer PHIT training through various programs. Academic institutions focus on student recruitment, developing courses/curriculum, and granting degrees/certificates, and the role of practice partners is to support experiential learning through internships/practicums.
Results The TRIUMPH consortium is progressing toward its goals, with 692 students (79%) already trained in a PHIT modality as of December 2023. The learners comprise diverse race/ethnicity, including White (48%), Black/African American (32%), Asian (10%), White Hispanic (5%), American Indian/Alaska Native (2%), and Black Hispanic (1%). Numerous internships have been completed in settings ranging from state/local public health agencies to health care delivery systems. Diversity initiatives were supported by partnering with existing programs (e.g., the AMIA First Look program and the Nursing Knowledge Big Data Science conference).
Conclusion This consortium model is an excellent approach to informatics training and sharing expertise across partners. It provides scalability and broader geographic outreach while presenting opportunities to students from underrepresented backgrounds. Lessons learned have implications for overall informatics training (e.g., partnerships models, promoting racial/ethnic diversity).
#
Keywords
public health - education - professional training - workforce - public health informatics - informatics - diversity - partnershipsBackground and Significance
Public health agencies support surveillance of numerous communicable infections, chronic diseases, risk factors, cancer, vaccination services/tracking, and environmental assessments.[1] These are evidence-based and data-driven services dependent on informatics and exchanging data with various public health stakeholders.[2] Given that public health is an information-intense enterprise, a robust information infrastructure is essential to counter current and future public health threats[3] by facilitating data exchange and interoperability within various entities in the public health ecosystem and between clinical care and public health.[3] This will also ensure timely, complete, and granular data leading to information that is actionable,[4] assist in addressing health disparities and inequities,[5] [6] and population-level decision-making.[7] Many informatics functionalities (e.g., electronic data exchanges, standardized reporting, analytics)[8] [9] [10] were vital during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic[11] and are increasingly important in a globally interconnected world.
The National Commission to Transform Public Health Data Systems[12] advocates for a robust public health data system to identify problems, allocate resources, and promote health equity. Just developing information systems and tools may not be adequate. A public health workforce trained in informatics and motivated leadership is critical for effectively leveraging modern information technology (IT) to enhance public health services and decision-making.[13] [14] An informatics-savvy health department is needed, requiring informatics competencies all across the board ranging from workers, managers, and executive leadership.[15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists points to informatics as a growth area in public health,[21] along with meeting the needs of the Data Modernization Initiative[22] by the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control. The Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey highlights data and informatics skills gaps in the current workforce.[23] Unfortunately, less than 1% of the public health workforce have informatics roles, though it is a key factor for a strong public health system. This glaring absence of a strong information infrastructure[24] and informatics-savvy workforce was brought to light during the COVID-19 pandemic[25] and also starkly reilluminated the health disparities in the United States.
The Public Health Informatics and Technology (PHIT) Workforce Development Program[26] funded by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) aims to tackle the issue of informatics workforce shortage in public health. The objectives are to share details on one of the ONC-funded recipients, the TRaining in Informatics for Underrepresented Minorities in Public Health (TRIUMPH) consortium.[27] The overall aims of the current case study are to convey information on PHIT training and lessons learned by the TRIUMPH consortium and to advocate for the ongoing need for PHIT education.
#
Context and Approach
Public Health Informatics and Technology Workforce Development Program
The PHIT Workforce Development Program's intent is multifold and aims to strengthen U.S. public health IT efforts and to increase the representation of underrepresented communities within the public health IT workforce, along with increasing the capacity of minority-serving institutions to train underrepresented minority students[26] (refer to [Fig. 1]). Cooperative agreements worth $75 million were awarded to 10 recipients by ONC for PHIT workforce development. Five thousand individuals are expected to be trained through these 10 sites/consortia focused on individuals from underrepresented backgrounds. One of the funding requirements was a consortia approach to training comprising academic, public health, and community-based partners. The consortia include Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions, and other institutions of higher education. The recommended PHIT curriculum[26] offered by the various recipients focuses on relevant topics: health equity, data aspects of outbreak investigations, public health emergency preparedness/response, public health reporting, standards, and interoperability, collating multiple data, public health analytics, and public policy, among others. One of the key aspects of this workforce development initiative is the emphasis on experiential learning and gaining real-world experiences through paid internships. The program aims to make a lasting impact on health equity by creating sustainable professional PHIT pathways for underrepresented minority students and trainees.
#
TRaining in Informatics for Underrepresented Minorities in Public Health (TRIUMPH) Consortium
The TRIUMPH consortium[27] is one of the 10 recipients of the PHIT workforce development. It is a collaboration between academic and practice partners (refer to [Fig. 1]). The Schools of Public Health[28] and Nursing[29] at the University of Minnesota, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health at Georgia Southern University (GSU),[30] Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM),[31] and Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII)[32] offer various PHIT trainings. The academic institutions focus on student recruitment, developing courses/curriculum, formal PHIT-focused education, and granting degrees/certificates, and the role of practice partners is to support experiential learning through internships/practicums. The consortium operates on a collaborative model with shared leadership across the Schools of Public Health and Nursing at the University of Minnesota. The commitment is to train 879 students from September 2021 through September 2025, and a partnership approach is followed with the sharing of resources across the members (refer to [Fig. 2]). Some unique aspects of the TRIUMPH consortium are collaboration with the leading biomedical informatics association (American Medical Informatics Association [AMIA])[33] and providing support to an informatics pathway, the AMIA First Look Program.[34] Another distinct collaboration is with the Nursing Knowledge Big Data Science (NKBDS) conference[35] to introduce PHIT in workshops and to support racial and ethnic diversity. One of the important features to point out about TRIUMPH is the special emphasis on pathways to public health and PHIT for American Indians (AIs). This led to the hiring of a student coordinator for AI students and collaboration with the Indigidata workshop to provide student support. [Fig. 2] represents the above characteristics of the TRIUMPH consortium. A current state evaluation through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) highlights the successes and challenges to date and provides a framework for the consortium moving forward.
#
#
Results
The TRIUMPH consortium is making progress toward its commitment to PHIT training. [Table 1] presents the various courses and programs (MPH in Health Informatics, PHIT certificate, PHIT concentration, PHIT courses) that have been developed and launched by the educational institutions. The academic programs comprise newly developed courses to fit PHIT program needs, adapting existing ones by updating content and including other PHIT-relevant courses. Content was shared among consortium members through program plans and syllabi for various course offerings. Apart from the time and expertise to create the content, all of these needed to be approved by various organizational curriculum committees and obtain institutional-level approval (i.e., approved by the Regents at the University of Minnesota or University System of Georgia, in the case of GSU). The institutions leveraged the consortium by sharing general guidance around approval processes and subsequently templates/flyers, etc., for program marketing. The PHII is focused on training and upskilling the current public health workforce. This is complementary to the workforce training offered by Magnolia Area Health Education Center in collaboration with GSU. An earlier version of the online course by PHII titled “Designing and Managing Public Health Information Systems,” was updated significantly to align with the current public health landscape and included interactive weekly sessions with faculty and course attendees.
Abbreviation: PHIT, Population Health Informatics and Technology.
As of December 2023, the TRIUMPH consortium has 692 students and is on track to complete the goal of 879 students by September 2025 (refer to [Fig. 3]). This aligns well with the overall ONC program timeline as the grant duration is from September 2021 through September 2025. As [Fig. 3] portrays, one of the academic partners (Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health at GSU) was successful in the launch of its brand new MPH in Public Health Informatics (online) program accompanied by good student recruitment. As noted earlier, racial/ethnic diversity initiatives were supported by partnering with existing programs such as the AMIA First Look program and the NKBDS conference. The learners (as of December 31, 2023) are diverse, comprising White (48%), Black/African American (32%), Asian (10%), White and Hispanic (5%), AI/Alaska Native (2%), Black and Hispanic (1%), Mixed race (1%), and Prefer not to answer (1%).
Given the importance of experiential learning and the program's focus on gaining real-world experiences through internships, practicums, and preceptorships, efforts were made to create these opportunities and offer them to students. These were paid and the amount was determined based on the federal predoctoral training stipend rate, credit load, and time devoted to the internship. [Table 2] lists the various academic options (practicum, Applied Practice Experience [APEx]) through which an internship was offered, the internship process, the various sites/settings, select feedback from mentors and the key output from these experiences. It displays the breadth of internships across public health agencies, health care delivery systems, and other nonprofit organizations involved in PHIT work and has served as a launchpad for career advancement. The UMN School of Public Health developed a PHIT workbook for students to synthesize key informatics aspects from their internships. [Table 3] presents the evaluation conducted to date through institutional venues (student rating of teaching at UMN) and feedback solicited through postcourse assessments. It portrays both positive input and also suggested program enhancements. This feedback is discussed during monthly consortium meetings as needed to solicit ideas for improvement. Other topics that are routinely discussed during the consortium meetings comprise tips/referrals for student placements for internships, current issues, lessons learned, recent challenges and successes across didactics, and practicum/internships.
Abbreviations: AMIA, American Medical Informatics Association; APEx, Applied Practice Experience; CDC, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control; CSTE, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; GSU, Georgia Southern University; ONC, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
Abbreviations: AMIA, American Medical Informatics Association; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ONC, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; PHII, Public Health Informatics Institute; PHIT, Public Health Informatics and Technology; TRIUMPH, Training in Informatics for Underrepresented Minorities in Public Health.
#
Discussion
Current large-scale Health Informatics and Technology policies[36] [37] and the National Academy of Medicine[38] underscore the need for interoperable information systems. Recent recommendations from reputable entities emphasize the need to transform the U.S. public health system to protect health and achieve health equity. These include the U.S. government accountability report,[39] the Building Back Better report,[40] and AMIA policy briefs and papers.[11] [41] All emphasize investing in the public health workforce and the importance of informatics-savvy staff as a key pillar to support data-driven and equitable public health. This underscores the value offered by the various ONC-funded PHIT workforce development programs.
Some unique aspects of the TRIUMPH consortium include a multidisciplinary core team including many with PHIT expertise, strong connections with operational public health, and an interest in PHIT research to make contributions to the field. The consortium has been cognizant of sustainability from the start with key programs (PHIT certificate at UMN, PHIT concentration at MSM, and MPH in Public Health Informatics at GSU) being well-integrated into existing academic structures, instead of a one-off grant effort. Another key aspect is leveraging the unique position of the PHIT program in a nursing educational ecosystem, which brings PHIT offerings to a different set of learners interested in this topic. The new organizational partnerships for internships/practicums will be appealing for student recruitment and future jobs. The consortium leadership has been proactive in developing collaborations with other PHIT consortia through joint research work and presentations, leading to exchange of ideas and partnerships of mutual benefits to PHIT programs.
Lessons Learned
One of the hurdles in launching the programs was the various layers of approvals required at the department/School/University levels and the time and effort needed to make this happen. This resulted in delays in the development of courses/programs, lag in marketing, and subsequent cascading effects impacting student recruitment. Despite a consortium model, the academic partner sites were functioning as independent entities due to issues with academic credit transfer across institutions. Securing internships was dependent on faculty time adding to their workload, due to the lack of an internship coordinator position at UMN programs. There are significant challenges in being hired by public health agencies due to the fact that PHIT skills are not congruent with the current job postings, accompanied by bureaucratic red tape with job postings and overall hiring practices. Given the movement toward public health modernization and the growing need for PHIT skills, informatics should be included as a core competency in the accreditation criteria for Schools and Programs of Public Health.[42] The last two require advocacy and changes to procedures and policies to make an impact, but definitely needed for PHIT growth and sustainability. [Table 4] presents a synthesis of lessons learned to date by the TRIUMPH consortium through a SWOT framework and highlights some of the successes and challenges. The numerous strengths listed highlight the vibrancy of the consortium partners which will be needed to offset the weakness and act upon the perceived opportunities and threats. This SWOT analysis will be used as guidance to determine future consortium priorities.
Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ONC, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; PHIT, Public Health Informatics and Technology; TRIUMPH, Training in Informatics for Underrepresented Minorities in Public Health.
Note: Noted by TRIUMPH Consortium Partners as of April 2024.
There are limitations to this case study on the TRIUMPH consortium, one of which is that this is a single example, and so the approach and results may not be generalizable. The academic and practice partners, their training programs and approaches to collaboration are unique to this consortium. The 10 recipients of the federal PHIT workforce development program have different characteristics (e.g., size of the main recipient institution, number of students being trained, number of partners, approaches to student internships, geographic reach). Funding is a big driver and informal partnerships to boost PHIT capacity may operate differently. Nevertheless, this consortium model needs to be evaluated and scaled up further to boost PHIT training to meet the increasing demands of an informatics-savvy workforce in public health.
#
#
Conclusion
This consortium model is a great approach to informatics training and for sharing expertise across partners. It offers scalability in terms of better geographic outreach, and also in offering various options to underrepresented students. One of the Healthy People 2030 objectives under consideration is to enhance the use and capabilities of informatics in public health (PHI-R06).[43] Numerous approaches need to be explored to scale-up informatics capacity and this partnership model spread across institutions is an option for consideration. Lessons learned have implications for overall informatics training (e.g., partnerships models, promoting racial/ethnic diversity, sustainability, accreditation criteria revision, revisiting hiring practices in public health).
#
Clinical Relevance Statement
An informatics-savvy workforce in public health is essential for the success of various PHIT initiatives that are being implemented to decrease the burden of provider reporting in health care. A modernized information infrastructure in public health supported by PHIT-trained staff has important implications for robust public health surveillance. This partnership model can be utilized for informatics training in other domains including clinical/nursing informatics.
#
Multiple-Choice Questions
-
What are some of the top workforce issues relevant to informatics in public health?
-
Lack of an informatics-savvy workforce
-
Less than 1% in public health informatics-related roles
-
Limited training options focused on public health informatics
-
Lack of racial/ethnic diversity in the workforce
-
All of the above.
Correct Answer: The correct answer is option e. One of the reasons that public health was overwhelmed during the COVID-19 pandemic was issues related to workforce along with an outdated public health information infrastructure. In order for initiatives such as the Data Modernization Initiative in public health to be successful, the workforce issues need to be addressed. The background provides the relevant contextual information.
-
-
What is the advantage of pursuing a partnership model for providing informatics training?
-
Sharing of resources for training and student recruitment
-
Scalability of training by providing many options
-
Collaborate on approaches to increase racial/ethnic diversity in workforce
-
Build a wider professional network for students
-
All of the above.
Correct Answer: The correct answer is option e. There are numerous benefits to a partnership model for informatics training, and this is shared in various sections of the manuscript across results and discussion. This partnership model can be utilized for informatics training in other domains including clinical/nursing informatics.
-
#
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Protection of Human Subjects
Not applicable as this case study focuses on education and not research.
-
References
- 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ten Essential Public Health Services. Accessed February 4, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/publichealthservices/essentialhealthservices.html
- 2 Shah GH, Vest JR, Lovelace K, McCullough JM. Local health departments' partners and challenges in electronic exchange of health information. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S44-S50
- 3 Lovelace K, Shah GH. Informatics as a strategic priority and collaborative processes to build a smarter, forward-looking health department. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S83-S88
- 4 Singletary V, Richards Jr CL, Ross DA, O'Carroll P, Baker EL. Modernizing our nation's public health information system: toward an integrated approach. J Public Health Manag Pract 2021; 27 (05) 521-525
- 5 Shah GH, Mase WA, Waterfield KC. Local health departments' engagement in addressing health disparities: the effect of health informatics. J Public Health Manag Pract 2019; 25 (02) 171-180
- 6 Shah GH, Khurshid A, Chopak-Foss J. Editorial: Assessing and addressing health inequities and disparities: the role of health informatics. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1161892
- 7 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Driving Public Health in the Fast Lane: The Urgent Need for a 21st Century Data Superhighway. Accessed January 30, 2024 at: https://resources.cste.org/data-superhighway/mobile/index.html
- 8 Rajamani S, Kayser A, Ruprecht A. et al. Electronic case reporting (eCR) of COVID-19 to public health: implementation perspectives from the Minnesota Department of Health. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (11) 1958-1966
- 9 Rajamani S, Chakoian H, Bieringer A. et al. Development and implementation of an interoperability tool across state public health agency's disease surveillance and immunization information systems. JAMIA Open 2023; 6 (03) ooad055
- 10 Rajamani S, Jiter N, Leeds M. et al. Evolving interoperability across a state public health immunization registry and electronic health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2024; 310: 23-27
- 11 Dixon BE, Staes C, Acharya J. et al. Enhancing the nation's public health information infrastructure: a report from the ACMI symposium. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30 (05) 1000-1005
- 12 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). Charting a Course for an Equity-Centered Data System. Accessed January 23, 2024 at: https://www.rwjf.org/en/insights/our-research/2021/10/charting-a-course-for-an-equity-centered-data-system.html
- 13 Gibson PJ, Shah GH, Streichert LC, Verchick L. Urgent Challenges for Local Public Health Informatics. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S6-S8
- 14 Lovelace K, Shah GH. Using information systems to improve a mid-sized local health department's effectiveness in a time of rapid change. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S89-S94
- 15 LaVenture M, Brand B, Ross DA, Baker EL. Building an informatics-savvy health department: part I, vision and core strategies. J Public Health Manag Pract 2014; 20 (06) 667-669
- 16 LaVenture M, Brand B, Ross DA, Baker EL. Building an informatics-savvy health department II: operations and tactics. J Public Health Manag Pract 2015; 21 (01) 96-99
- 17 LaVenture M, Brand B, Baker EL. Developing an informatics-savvy health department: from discrete projects to a coordinating program. Part I: assessment and governance. J Public Health Manag Pract 2017; 23 (03) 325-327
- 18 LaVenture M, Brand B, Baker EL. Developing an informatics-savvy health department: from discrete projects to a coordinating program Part II: creating a skilled workforce. J Public Health Manag Pract 2017; 23 (06) 638-640
- 19 Brand B, LaVenture M, Baker EL. Developing an informatics-savvy health department: from discrete projects to a coordinating program-part III, ensuring well-designed and effectively used information systems. J Public Health Manag Pract 2018; 24 (02) 181-184
- 20 Brand B, LaVenture M, Lipshutz JA, Stephens WF, Baker EL. The information imperative for public health: a call to action to become informatics-savvy. J Public Health Manag Pract 2018; 24 (06) 586-589
- 21 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Epidemiology Capacity Assessment Report. 2021 . Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/eca/2021_ECA_Report_FINAL.pdf
- 22 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC: Data Modernization Initiative (DMI). Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/surveillance/surveillance-data-strategies/dmi-investments.html
- 23 McFarlane TD, Dixon BE, Grannis SJ, Gibson PJ. Public health informatics in local and state health agencies: an update from the public health workforce interests and needs survey. J Public Health Manag Pract 2019; 25 (Suppl. 02) S67-S77
- 24 Drezner K, McKeown L, Shah GH. Assessing skills and capacity for informatics: activities most commonly performed by or for local health departments. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S51-S57
- 25 Dixon BE, Caine VA, Halverson PK. Deficient response to COVID-19 makes the case for evolving the public health system. Am J Prev Med 2020; 59 (06) 887-891
- 26 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). Public Health Informatics and Technology (PHIT) Workforce Development Program. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/onc-funding-opportunities/public-health-informatics-technology-phit-workforce-development
- 27 TRIUMPH Consortium. TRIUMPH (TRaining in Informatics for Underrepresented Minorities in Public Health), a PHIT Workforce Development Program. Accessed February 4, 2024 at: https://www.sph.umn.edu/research/centers/cphs/practice-support/triumph/
- 28 UMN School of Public Health. Public Health Administration and Policy MPH. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.sph.umn.edu/academics/degrees-programs/mph/public-health-administration-policy/
- 29 UMN School of Nursing. Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) - Nursing Informatics. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://nursing.umn.edu/academics/doctor-nursing-practice/specialty-areas/nursing-informatics
- 30 Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University. Public Health Informatics. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.georgiasouthern.edu/jphcoph/degrees/master-public-health/mph-online/#Health-Informatics
- 31 Morehouse School of Medicine. Graduate Education in Public Health. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.msm.edu/GEPH/
- 32 Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). INFOR_WHAT_ICS? Defining Public Health Informatics. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://phii.org/how-we-do-it/defining-public-health-informatics/
- 33 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). Discovering Health Insights. Accelerating Healthcare Transformation. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://amia.org/about-amia
- 34 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). AMIA First Look Program. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://amia.org/communities/women_in_amia/amia-first-look-program
- 35 School of Nursing, University of Minnesota. Nursing Knowledge Big Data Science (NKBDS) Initiative and Conference. Accessed February 6, 2024 at: https://nursing.umn.edu/centers/center-nursing-informatics/nursing-knowledge-big-data-science-initiative
- 36 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Promoting Interoperability Programs. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms
- 37 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. ONC's Cures Act Provisions for Healthcare and Health IT. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/oncs-cures-act-final-rule
- 38 National Academy of Medicine. Information Technology Interoperability and Use for Better Care and Evidence: A Vital Direction for Health and Health Care. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://nam.edu/information-technology-interoperability-and-use-for-better-care-and-evidence-a-vital-direction-for-health-and-health-care/
- 39 Government Accountability Office (GAO). U.S. Government Accountability Office. Public Health Emergencies: Data Management Challenges Impact National Response. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-106175
- 40 Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). Building Back Better. Transforming U.S. public health data and infrastructure to protect health and achieve health equity. A Report by the Public Health Informatics Institute. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://phii.org/resources/building-back-better/
- 41 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). Public Policy Committee. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://amia.org/public-policy/public-policy-committee
- 42 Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH). Accreditation Criteria: Schools of Public Health and Public Health Programs. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://media.ceph.org/documents/2021.Criteria.pdf
- 43 US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Enhance the use and capabilities of informatics in public health, Healthy People 2030,. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/public-health-infrastructure/enhance-use-and-capabilities-informatics-public-health-phi-r06
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 14 March 2024
Accepted: 03 June 2024
Article published online:
14 August 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ten Essential Public Health Services. Accessed February 4, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/publichealthservices/essentialhealthservices.html
- 2 Shah GH, Vest JR, Lovelace K, McCullough JM. Local health departments' partners and challenges in electronic exchange of health information. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S44-S50
- 3 Lovelace K, Shah GH. Informatics as a strategic priority and collaborative processes to build a smarter, forward-looking health department. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S83-S88
- 4 Singletary V, Richards Jr CL, Ross DA, O'Carroll P, Baker EL. Modernizing our nation's public health information system: toward an integrated approach. J Public Health Manag Pract 2021; 27 (05) 521-525
- 5 Shah GH, Mase WA, Waterfield KC. Local health departments' engagement in addressing health disparities: the effect of health informatics. J Public Health Manag Pract 2019; 25 (02) 171-180
- 6 Shah GH, Khurshid A, Chopak-Foss J. Editorial: Assessing and addressing health inequities and disparities: the role of health informatics. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1161892
- 7 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Driving Public Health in the Fast Lane: The Urgent Need for a 21st Century Data Superhighway. Accessed January 30, 2024 at: https://resources.cste.org/data-superhighway/mobile/index.html
- 8 Rajamani S, Kayser A, Ruprecht A. et al. Electronic case reporting (eCR) of COVID-19 to public health: implementation perspectives from the Minnesota Department of Health. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (11) 1958-1966
- 9 Rajamani S, Chakoian H, Bieringer A. et al. Development and implementation of an interoperability tool across state public health agency's disease surveillance and immunization information systems. JAMIA Open 2023; 6 (03) ooad055
- 10 Rajamani S, Jiter N, Leeds M. et al. Evolving interoperability across a state public health immunization registry and electronic health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2024; 310: 23-27
- 11 Dixon BE, Staes C, Acharya J. et al. Enhancing the nation's public health information infrastructure: a report from the ACMI symposium. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30 (05) 1000-1005
- 12 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). Charting a Course for an Equity-Centered Data System. Accessed January 23, 2024 at: https://www.rwjf.org/en/insights/our-research/2021/10/charting-a-course-for-an-equity-centered-data-system.html
- 13 Gibson PJ, Shah GH, Streichert LC, Verchick L. Urgent Challenges for Local Public Health Informatics. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S6-S8
- 14 Lovelace K, Shah GH. Using information systems to improve a mid-sized local health department's effectiveness in a time of rapid change. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S89-S94
- 15 LaVenture M, Brand B, Ross DA, Baker EL. Building an informatics-savvy health department: part I, vision and core strategies. J Public Health Manag Pract 2014; 20 (06) 667-669
- 16 LaVenture M, Brand B, Ross DA, Baker EL. Building an informatics-savvy health department II: operations and tactics. J Public Health Manag Pract 2015; 21 (01) 96-99
- 17 LaVenture M, Brand B, Baker EL. Developing an informatics-savvy health department: from discrete projects to a coordinating program. Part I: assessment and governance. J Public Health Manag Pract 2017; 23 (03) 325-327
- 18 LaVenture M, Brand B, Baker EL. Developing an informatics-savvy health department: from discrete projects to a coordinating program Part II: creating a skilled workforce. J Public Health Manag Pract 2017; 23 (06) 638-640
- 19 Brand B, LaVenture M, Baker EL. Developing an informatics-savvy health department: from discrete projects to a coordinating program-part III, ensuring well-designed and effectively used information systems. J Public Health Manag Pract 2018; 24 (02) 181-184
- 20 Brand B, LaVenture M, Lipshutz JA, Stephens WF, Baker EL. The information imperative for public health: a call to action to become informatics-savvy. J Public Health Manag Pract 2018; 24 (06) 586-589
- 21 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Epidemiology Capacity Assessment Report. 2021 . Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/eca/2021_ECA_Report_FINAL.pdf
- 22 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC: Data Modernization Initiative (DMI). Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/surveillance/surveillance-data-strategies/dmi-investments.html
- 23 McFarlane TD, Dixon BE, Grannis SJ, Gibson PJ. Public health informatics in local and state health agencies: an update from the public health workforce interests and needs survey. J Public Health Manag Pract 2019; 25 (Suppl. 02) S67-S77
- 24 Drezner K, McKeown L, Shah GH. Assessing skills and capacity for informatics: activities most commonly performed by or for local health departments. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016; 22 (suppl 6, Public Health Informatics [suppl 6]): S51-S57
- 25 Dixon BE, Caine VA, Halverson PK. Deficient response to COVID-19 makes the case for evolving the public health system. Am J Prev Med 2020; 59 (06) 887-891
- 26 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). Public Health Informatics and Technology (PHIT) Workforce Development Program. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/onc-funding-opportunities/public-health-informatics-technology-phit-workforce-development
- 27 TRIUMPH Consortium. TRIUMPH (TRaining in Informatics for Underrepresented Minorities in Public Health), a PHIT Workforce Development Program. Accessed February 4, 2024 at: https://www.sph.umn.edu/research/centers/cphs/practice-support/triumph/
- 28 UMN School of Public Health. Public Health Administration and Policy MPH. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.sph.umn.edu/academics/degrees-programs/mph/public-health-administration-policy/
- 29 UMN School of Nursing. Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) - Nursing Informatics. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://nursing.umn.edu/academics/doctor-nursing-practice/specialty-areas/nursing-informatics
- 30 Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University. Public Health Informatics. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.georgiasouthern.edu/jphcoph/degrees/master-public-health/mph-online/#Health-Informatics
- 31 Morehouse School of Medicine. Graduate Education in Public Health. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.msm.edu/GEPH/
- 32 Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). INFOR_WHAT_ICS? Defining Public Health Informatics. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://phii.org/how-we-do-it/defining-public-health-informatics/
- 33 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). Discovering Health Insights. Accelerating Healthcare Transformation. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://amia.org/about-amia
- 34 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). AMIA First Look Program. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://amia.org/communities/women_in_amia/amia-first-look-program
- 35 School of Nursing, University of Minnesota. Nursing Knowledge Big Data Science (NKBDS) Initiative and Conference. Accessed February 6, 2024 at: https://nursing.umn.edu/centers/center-nursing-informatics/nursing-knowledge-big-data-science-initiative
- 36 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Promoting Interoperability Programs. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms
- 37 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. ONC's Cures Act Provisions for Healthcare and Health IT. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/oncs-cures-act-final-rule
- 38 National Academy of Medicine. Information Technology Interoperability and Use for Better Care and Evidence: A Vital Direction for Health and Health Care. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://nam.edu/information-technology-interoperability-and-use-for-better-care-and-evidence-a-vital-direction-for-health-and-health-care/
- 39 Government Accountability Office (GAO). U.S. Government Accountability Office. Public Health Emergencies: Data Management Challenges Impact National Response. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-106175
- 40 Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). Building Back Better. Transforming U.S. public health data and infrastructure to protect health and achieve health equity. A Report by the Public Health Informatics Institute. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://phii.org/resources/building-back-better/
- 41 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). Public Policy Committee. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://amia.org/public-policy/public-policy-committee
- 42 Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH). Accreditation Criteria: Schools of Public Health and Public Health Programs. Accessed February 5, 2024 at: https://media.ceph.org/documents/2021.Criteria.pdf
- 43 US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Enhance the use and capabilities of informatics in public health, Healthy People 2030,. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Accessed February 3, 2024 at: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/public-health-infrastructure/enhance-use-and-capabilities-informatics-public-health-phi-r06