Synlett 2018; 29(11): 1441-1446
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1610148
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Synthesis of a Chiral Auxiliary Family from Levoglucosenone and Evaluation in the Diels–Alder Reaction

Julian Klepp
a   School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia   Email: ben.greatrex@une.edu.au
,
Christopher J. Sumby
b   Department of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia
,
a   School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia   Email: ben.greatrex@une.edu.au
› Author Affiliations
JK thanks UNE for an IPRA scholarship. This work was financially ­supported by the University of New England.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 14 February 2018

Accepted after revision: 17 April 2018

Publication Date:
25 May 2018 (online)


Abstract

A new family of chiral auxiliaries has been developed based on the lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis product levoglucosenone. A promising single stereoisomer with an alcohol and π-stacking phenyl substituents was prepared in excellent yield in two steps from di­hydrolevoglucosenone without chromatography on >50 g scale. Acrylate esters prepared from the auxiliaries underwent diastereoselective Lewis acid promoted Diels–Alder reactions with cyclopentadiene (­endo/exo 98:2, endo d.r. up to 98:2), dimethylbutadiene (d.r. 93:7), and isoprene (d.r. > 98:2)

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes


    • For reviews of asymmetric synthesis using auxiliaries, see:
    • 1a Christmann M. Bräse S. Asymmetric Synthesis: The Essentials . Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2008. Vol. 1
    • 1b Seyden-Penne J. Chiral Auxiliaries and Ligands in Asymmetric Synthesis . Wiley-Interscience; New York: 1995
    • 1c Ager D. Handbook of Chiral Chemicals . CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 2005
    • 1d Roos G. Key Chiral Auxiliary Applications . Academic Press; Oxford: 2014
  • 2 Corey EJ. Ensley HE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975; 97: 6908
    • 4a Oppolzer W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984; 23: 876
    • 4b Comins DL. Goehring RR. Joseph SP. O'Connor S. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 2574
    • 5a Davies SG. Lee JA. Roberts PM. Thomson JE. Yin J. Tetrahedron 2011; 67: 6382
    • 5b Whitesell JK. Chem. Rev. 1992; 92: 953
  • 6 Muñiz K. Lesato A. Nieger M. Chem. Eur. J. 2003; 9: 5581
  • 7 Donohoe TJ. Guyo PM. Helliwell M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999; 40: 435
    • 8a Little RD. Moeller KD. J. Org. Chem. 1983; 48: 4487
    • 8b Selvakumar S. Sakamoto R. Maruoka K. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 6552
  • 9 Kozikowski AP. Zhao L. Zhang A. Wang CZ. Flippen-Anderson J. Johnson KM. ChemMedChem 2006; 1: 58
  • 10 Buschmann H. Scharl H.-D. Synthesis 1988; 827
    • 11a Esser P. Buschmann H. Meyer-Stork M. Scharf HD. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992; 31: 1190
    • 11b Mezrhab B. Dumas F. d'Angelo J. Riche C. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 500
    • 11c Chu Y.-Y. Yu C.-S. Chen C.-J. Yang K.-S. Lain J.-C. Lin C.-H. Chen K. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 64: 6993
    • 11d Al Hazmi AM. Sheikh NS. Bataille CJ. Al-Hadedi AA. Watkin SV. Luker TJ. Camp NP. Brown RC. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5104
    • 11e Gelat F. Richard V. Berger O. Montchamp J.-L. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 1819
    • 11f Sarakinos G. Corey EJ. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 1741
  • 12 Kunz H. Rück K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1993; 32: 336
  • 13 Lawrence CH. Raverty WD. Duncan AJ. WO 2011000030, 2011
    • 14a Sarotti AM. Joullié MM. Spanevello RA. Suárez AG. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 5561
    • 14b Sarotti AM. Spanevello RA. Suárez AG. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 1487
    • 14c Sarotti AM. Fernández I. Spanevello RA. Sierra MA. Suárez AG. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 3389
    • 14d Sarotti AM. Spanevello RA. Duhayon C. Tuchagues J.-P. Suárez AG. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 241
    • 14e Sarotti AM. Spanevello RA. Suárez AG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 6987
    • 14f Sarotti AM. Spanevello RA. Suárez AG. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 3502
  • 15 Zanardi MM. Suárez AG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 999
  • 16 Ledingham ET. Stockton KP. Greatrex BW. Aust. J. Chem. 2017; 70: 1146
  • 17 Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of the Auxiliary 19a and Diels–Alder Reactions: (1S,5R)-3,3-Dibenzyl-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-4-one (14a) 16 To a stirred solution of ketone 8 (30.0 g, 1.0 equiv, 234 mmol) and BnBr (88.2 g, 59.7 mL, 2.2 equiv, 515.1 mmol) in dry THF (250 mL) cooled using a water/ice bath was added t-BuOK (21.3 g, 2.2 equiv, 171.7 mmol) portion wise, such that the temperature of the reaction did not exceed 30 °C. The mixture was stirred until complete by TLC (3 h), then 1 M HCl (250 mL) and EtOAc (600 mL) were added. The organic phase was separated and washed with sat. NaHCO3 (300 mL) then brine (300 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. If spontaneous crystallization did not occur, residual benzyl bromide was removed using a high-vacuum pump with gentle warming of the mixture. The residue was then dissolved in MeOH (400 mL) and allowed to crystallize for 24 h over which time some solvent evaporated to give a final volume of ca. 100 mL. The crystals were collected by vacuum filtration and washed with cold MeOH to give 14a as colorless crystals (50.4 g, 70%). Evaporation of the mother liquor and flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexanes = 1:4) afforded an additional portion of 14a (13.2 g, 18%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.30–7.22 (m, 6 H, Ar-H), 7.12–7.07 (m, 4 H, Ar-H), 5.04 (s, 1 H, 5-H), 4.53 (br dd, J = 6.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, 1-H), 3.53 (dd, J = 6.9, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, 7-Hα), 3.27 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 3.26 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 3.10 (d, J = 7.20 Hz, 1 H, 7-Hβ), 2.75 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 2.58 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 2.39 (dd, J = 14.7, 6.0 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 1.75 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 1 H, 2-H). (1S,4S,5R)-3,3-Dibenzyl-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]-octan-4-ol (7a) The ketone 14a (60.0 g, 1.0 equiv, 195 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (100 mL), MeOH (180 mL) was added and the solution cooled to –15 °C. Finely powdered NaBH4 (6.0 g, 0.8 equiv, 156 mmol) was then added at a rate such that the temperature of the reaction did not exceed 0 °C. After stirring for 2 h, the reaction was allowed to warm to ambient temperature and the reaction monitored by TLC. When no starting material remained, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and 1.0 M HCl (100 mL) was added. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 100 mL) ensuring that no product remained in the aqueous layer by TLC, then the organic layers were combined, dried with MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was recrystallized using an EtOAc/hexanes (1:4) mixture by slow evaporation to give 7a as colorless crystals (56.9 g, 94%); mp 126–127 °C (from (i-Pr)2O); [α]D 25–43 (c 1.1, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.36–7.33 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 7.30–7.26 (m, 6 H, Ar-H), 7.08–7.07 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 5.34 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 4.43–4.41 (ddd, J = 5.4, 2.8, 2.8, 1 H, 1-H), 4.29 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, 7-Hβ), 3.82 (dd, J = 7.5, 5.4 Hz, 1 H, 7-Hα), 3.71 (dd, J = 10.0, 2.1 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.17 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 3.02 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 2.88 (d, J = 13.4 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 2.38 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 1.87–1.84 (m, 1 H, OH), 1.74 (app. br d, J = 2.9 Hz, 2 H, 2-H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.2, 137.7, 131.9, 131.6, 128.40, 128.38, 126.74, 126.67, 103.0, 73.7, 71.6, 68.1, 44.4, 41.4, 39.4, 31.1. FT-IR (neat): 3514, 2969, 1365, 1229, 897, 701 cm–1. MS (ESI): m/z = 332.9 [M + Na]+; ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for [M + Na]+: C20H22O3Na: 333.1467; found: 333.1473. General Procedure for the Diels–Alder Reactions of Acrylates with Cyclopentadiene The acrylic ester 19a (1.0 equiv) was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (0.2 M final concentration) under N2 and then cooled to the temperature indicated in Table 1. The Lewis acid was added under N2 and stirred for 20 min at the indicated temperature, then freshly distilled cyclopentadiene (5 mmol) was added dropwise, and the reaction was stirred at the temperature indicated in Table 1 for the appropriate time. After 18 h, if the reaction was incomplete a further portion of cyclopentadiene (5 mmol) was added. The reactions without Lewis acid were concentrated after completion. The reactions where Lewis acids were used were quenched by the addition of water and 1 M HCl, then extracted with CH2Cl2(3×). The combined organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and then concentrated under reduced pressure. For all reactions, the residues were absorbed onto a pad of silica (10 g/g ester), and the remaining cyclopentadiene and its corresponding dimer were washed from the silica using hexanes. Then the product was eluted with EtOAc. (1S,4S,5R)-3,3-Dibenzyl-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-4-yl (1R,4R)-bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2-carboxylate ((R)-22a) Following the general procedure, acrylate ester 19a (1.0 g, 1.0 equiv, 2.8 mmol) was treated with cyclopentadiene (1.81 mg, 10 equiv, 28.0 mmol) catalyzed by 1.8 M EtAlCl2 in toluene (1.50 mL, 1.0 equiv, 2.8 mmol). The product was recrystallized by slow evaporation from dry MeOH to afford (R)-22a as colorless crystals (1.05 g, 89%); mp 96–98 °C; [α]D 25 –23 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.37–7.34 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 7.30–7.26 (m, 4 H, Ar-H), 7.22–7.20 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 6.97–6.95 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 6.33 (dd, J = 5.7, 3.1 Hz, 1 H, 15-H), 6.11 (dd, J = 5.7, 2.8 Hz, 1 H, 16-H), 5.35 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 4.91 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.40 (ddd, J = 5.5, 5.2, 3.1 Hz, 1 H, 1-H), 4.34 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, 7-Hβ), 3.81 (dd, J = 7.5, 5.2 Hz, 1 H, 7-Hβ), 3.46 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1 H, 18-H), 3.37 (br s, 1 H, 11-H), 3.15–3.11 (m, 1 H, 12-H), 3.12–3.08 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1 H, 18-H), 2.98 (br s, 1 H, 14-H), 2.60 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1 H, 18-H), 2.48 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1 H, 18-H), 1.98 (ddd, J = 11.8, 9.3, 3.7 Hz, 1 H, 13-H), 1.76 (app. d, J = 2.9 Hz, 2 H, 2-H), 1.57–1.50 (m, 2 H, 13-H, 17-H), 1.35 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H, 17-H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 174.2, 138.7, 138.2, 136.7, 132.1, 132.0, 131.6, 128.31, 128.29, 126.8, 126.6, 100.1, 73.3, 72.7, 68.0, 50.2, 46.2, 43.8, 42.7, 40.48, 40.45, 30.9, 29.9, 29.2. FT-IR (neat): 2958, 1746, 1356, 1231, 899, 708 cm–1. MS (ESI): m/z = 453.1 [M + Na]+. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for [M + Na]+ C28H30O4Na: 453.2042; found: 453.2042
    • 18a Corey EJ. Loh TP. Roper TD. Azimioara MD. Noe MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 8290
    • 18b Maddaluno JF. Gresh N. Giessner-Prettre C. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 793
    • 18c Loncharich RJ. Schwartz TR. Houk K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987; 109: 14
    • 18d Barba C. Carmona D. Garcia JI. Lamata MP. Mayoral JA. Salvatella L. Viguri F. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 9831
  • 19 Dumas F. Mezrhab B. d'Angelo J. Riche C. Chiaroni A. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 2293
  • 20 Whitesell JK. Lawrence RM. Chen HH. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 4779
  • 21 Hirai H. Komiyama M. J. Polym. Sci. A 1974; 12: 2701
    • 22a Funel JA. Abele S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 3822
    • 22b Kelly MG. Childers WE. Harrison BL. Zhang G. Bravo BA. Schecter LE. WO 2004111035, 2004