Synlett 2015; 26(06): 759-764
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1380142
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Synthesis of Substituted Aryl Ketones by Addition of Alcohols to Alkynes Using Amberlyst-15/Ionic Liquid as a Recyclable Catalytic System

Kishor V. Wagh
Department of Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology, N. Parekh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai-400 019, India   Email: bm.bhanage@gmail.com   Email: bm.bhanage@ictmumbai.edu.in
,
Bhalchandra M. Bhanage*
Department of Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology, N. Parekh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai-400 019, India   Email: bm.bhanage@gmail.com   Email: bm.bhanage@ictmumbai.edu.in
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 29 November 2014

Accepted after revision: 14 January 2015

Publication Date:
12 February 2015 (online)


Abstract

A highly efficient protocol for the synthesis of substituted aryl ketones by using Amberlyst-15 immobilized in [Bmim][PF6] ionic liquid has been firstly developed. The present protocol works under metal-free, solvent-free, mild reaction conditions with 100% atom efficiency. The various aryl ketones were obtained in good to excellent yields. The developed catalytic system was recycled efficiently up to five cycles without significant loss in catalytic activity.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Franck HG, Stadelhofer JW. Industrial Aromatic Chemistry. Springer; Berlin: 1988
    • 1b Surburg H, Panten J. Common Fragrance and Flavor Materials. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006. 5th ed.
    • 1c Dieter RK. Tetrahedron 1999; 55: 4177
    • 1d Mancuso AJ, Huang SL, Swern D. J. Org. Chem. 1978; 43: 2480
    • 1e Wang XJ, Zhang L, Sun X, Xu Y, Krishnamurthy D, Senanayake CH. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5593
    • 1f Hatano B, Kadokawa JI, Tagaya H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 5859
    • 1g Lawrence NJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998; 1739
    • 1h Krause N. Modern Organocopper Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002
    • 1i Batt DG, Goodman R, Jones DG, Kerr JS, Mantegna LR, McAllister C, Newton RC, Nurnberg S, Welch PK, Covington MB. J. Med. Chem. 1993; 36: 1434
    • 1j Reux B, Nevalainen T, Raitio KH, Koskinen AM. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009; 17: 4441
    • 3a Jennings PW, Hartman PJ. W, Hiscox WC. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994; 222: 317
    • 3b Hartman JW, Hiscox WC, Jennings PW. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 7613
    • 3c Inu K, Imai K, Utimoto K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987; 28: 3127
    • 3d Petrov AA, Kupin BS. Zh. Obsch. Khim. 1959; 29: 3153
    • 3e Tani K, Kataoka Y In Catalytic Heterofunctionalisation. Togni A, Grützmacher H. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2001: 171
  • 4 Bras GL, Provot O, Peyrat JF, Alami M, Brion JD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 5497
  • 5 Pal M, Parasuraman K, Gupta S, Yeleswarpu KR. Synlett 2002; 1976
    • 6a Sonogashira K In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Vol. 3. Trost BM, Fleming I. Pergamon Press; New York: 1991: 521
    • 6b Sonogashira K, Tohda Y, Hagihara N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975; 16: 4467
  • 7 Jana U, Biswas S, Maiti S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 5798
  • 8 Jefferies LR, Cook SP. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 4204
    • 9a Yadav DK. T, Rajak SS, Bhanage BM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 931
    • 9b Deshmukh KM, Qureshi ZS, Dhake KP, Bhanage BM. Catal. Commun. 2010; 12: 207
    • 9c Watile RA, Bagal DB, Patil YP, Bhanage BM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 6383
    • 10a Olivier-Bourbigou H, Magna L, Morvan D. Appl. Catal., A 2010; 373: 1
    • 10b Badgujar KC, Bhanage BM. Bioresour. Technol. 2015; 178: 2
  • 11 Dupont J, de Souza RF, Suarez PA. Z. Chem. Rev. 2002; 102: 3667
    • 12a Chauvin Y, Mussmann L, Olivier H. Angew. Chem. 1995; 107: 2941
    • 12b Carmichael AJ, Earle MJ, Holbrey JD, McCormac PB, Seddon KR. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 997
    • 12c Bellefon CD, Pollet E, Grenouillet P. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999; 145: 121
    • 12d Welton T. Chem. Rev. 1999; 99: 2071
    • 12e Hallett JP, Welton T. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 3508
    • 13a Wagh KV, Bhanage BM. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 22763
    • 13b Qureshi ZS, Deshmukh KM, Bhor MD. Bhanage B. M. Catal. Commun. 2009; 10: 833
    • 13c Deshmukh KM, Qureshi ZS, Nandurkar NS, Bhanage BM. Can. J. Chem. 2009; 87: 401
    • 13d Qureshi ZS, Deshmukh KM, Tambade PJ, Dhake KP, Bhanage BM. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 6233
    • 13e Qureshi ZS, Deshmukh KM, Dhake KP, Bhanage BM. RSC Adv. 2011; 1: 1106
    • 13f Qureshi ZS, Deshmukh KM, Tambade PJ, Dhake KP, Bhanage BM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 724
  • 14 Huddleston JG, Visser AE, Reichert WM, Willauer HD, Broker GA, Rogers RD. Green Chem. 2001; 3: 156
  • 15 General Experimental Procedure for the Addition of Alcohols with Alkynes To a well-stirred mixture of Amberlyst-15 [H+ exchange capacity (4.2 meq/g) and high surface area (42 m2/g)] (5 equiv) in [Bmim][PF6] (2 mL), 1a (1.2 mmol) and 2a (1 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C, and the progress of the reaction was monitored by GC/TLC. After completion of reaction, the mixture was cooled to r.t., and diisopropyl ether (5 mL) was added with vigorous shaking. The ether phase was separated, and the extraction procedure was repeated (3 × 5 mL). The organic extracts were combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, 60–120 mesh; PE–EtOAc (9:1)] to give 1,3,3-triphenylpropan-1-one (3a) in 75% yield. After extraction, the reaction vessel containing the recovered Amberlyst-15/[Bmim][PF6] was dried in vacuo for an hour and then charged with 1a and 2a directly for the next run. The various ionic liquids used were prepared as previously reported.14 1,3,3-Triphenylpropan-1-one (3a) White solid; yield: 213 mg (75%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.98–7.96 (m, 2 H), 7.58–7.56 (m, 1 H), 7.49–7.45 (m, 2 H), 7.31–7.28 (m, 8 H), 7.23–7.18 (m, 2 H), 4.87 (t, J = 8 Hz, 1 H), 3.78 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.01, 144.17, 137.11, 128.61, 128.57, 128.07, 127.86, 126.39, 45.97, 44.76. GC–MS (EI): m/z = 286 (10.5) [M+], 167 (31.3), 165 (15.5), 155 (28.0), 105 (100.0), 77 (28.3), 71 (10.5), 43 (11.4). 3,3-Diphenyl-1-p-tolylpropan-1-one (3b) White solid; yield: 228 mg (76%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.90–7.88 (m, 2 H), 7.31–7.26 (m, 7 H), 7.23–7.20 (m, 5 H), 4.87 (t, J = 8 Hz, 1 H), 3.76 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H), 2.44 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.63, 144.27, 143.88, 134.65, 129.29, 128.56, 128.22, 127.88, 126.36, 46.01, 44.62, 21.65. GC–MS (EI): m/z = 300 (10.7) [M+], 167 (25.8), 165 (12.8), 120 (9.9), 119 (100.0), 91 (24.8), 77 (4.9).