Synlett 2013; 24(11): 1387-1390
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1338857
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

An Enantioselective Total Synthetic Approach to (+)-Heptemerone G and (+)-Guanacastepene A from 2-Furyl Methyl Carbinol

Karol Michalak
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw 42, Poland   Fax: +48(22)6326681   Email: jerzy.wicha@icho.edu.pl
,
Jerzy Wicha*
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw 42, Poland   Fax: +48(22)6326681   Email: jerzy.wicha@icho.edu.pl
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 12 April 2013

Accepted after revision: 30 April 2013

Publication Date:
06 June 2013 (online)


Abstract

An enantioselective synthesis of the key bicyclic building block for (+)-heptemerone G and (+)-guanacastepene A construction has been accomplished. 2-Furyl methyl carbinol was used as the starting material and (S)-4-hydroxy-2-methylcyclopent-2-en-1-one as the primal optically active intermediate.

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Brase S, Encinas A, Keck J, Nising CF. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 3903
  • 2 Hog DT, Webster R, Trauner D. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012; 29: 752
  • 3 Brady SF, Singh MP, Janso JE, Clardy S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 2116
  • 4 Brady SF, Bondi SM, Clardy J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 9900
  • 5 Valdivia C, Kettering M, Anke H, Thines E, Sterner O. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 9527
  • 6 Kettering M, Valdivia C, Sterner O, Anke H, Thines E. J. Antibiot. 2005; 58: 390
  • 7 Liu YZ, Li YY, Ou YX, Xiao SY, Lu CH, Zheng ZH, Shen YM. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012; 22: 5059
  • 8 Singh MP, Janso JE, Luckman SW, Brady SF, Clardy J, Greenstein M, Maiese WM. J. Antibiot. 2000; 53: 256
  • 9 McGowan CA, Schmieder AK, Roberts L, Greaney MF. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007; 5: 1522
  • 10 Yao LF, Shi M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 4036
  • 11 Fang XJ, Tong XF. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 317
  • 12 Qiao Y, Kumar S, Malachowski WP. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 2636
  • 13 Bennett NB, Hong AY, Harned AM, Stoltz BM. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 56
  • 14 Hiersemann M, Helmboldt H. Top. Curr. Chem. 2004; 243: 73
  • 15 Maifeld SV, Lee D. Synlett 2006; 1623
  • 16 Mandal M, Yun HD, Dudley GB, Lin SN, Tan DS, Danishefsky SJ. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 10619
  • 17 Shi B, Hawryluk NA, Snider BB. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 1030
  • 18 Shipe WD, Sorensen EJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 7025
  • 19 Michalak K, Michalak M, Wicha J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 49: 6807
  • 20 Michalak K, Michalak M, Wicha J. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 8337
  • 21 Mehta G, Pallavi K, Umarye JD. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2005; 4456
  • 22 Miller AK, Hughes CC, Kennedy-Smith JJ, Gradl SN, Trauner D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 17057
  • 23 Iimura S, Overman LE, Paulini R, Zakarian A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 13095
  • 24 Gampe CM, Carreira EM. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 15761
  • 25 Piancatelli G, Scettri A, Barbadoro S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976; 3555
  • 26 D’Auria M. Heterocycles 2000; 52: 185
  • 27 Stork G, Kowalski C, Garcia G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975; 97: 3258
  • 28 Piancatelli G, Scettri A. Synthesis 1977; 116
  • 29 Babiak KA, Ng JS, Dygos JH, Weyker CL, Wang Y.-F, Wong CH. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 3377
  • 30 Tanis SP, Robinson ED, McMills MC, Watt W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 8349
  • 31 Schmid RD, Verger R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998; 37: 1609
  • 32 Faber K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry. Springer; Berlin: 2004
  • 33 Synthesis of (S)-5 from 4: Distilled H2O (67 mL), MgSO4 (6.72 g) and 4 (7.507 g) were heated to 160 °C for 3 h (sealed ampoule). After cooling, the solution was decanted from a polymeric material and washed with MTBE–hexanes (3 mL and 6 mL). The organic layer was discharged. The aqueous solution was salted out with NaCl and extracted with EtOAc. The extract was dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated. The residue (4.948 g) was distilled in a Kügelrohr apparatus at 140 °C/1.7 mmHg to give the rac-5 (oil, 99% pure by HPLC, 4.248 g, 56% yield). Kinetic Resolution of rac -5: Isopropenyl acetate (28.0 mL, 255 mmol), Novozym 435® (19.7 mg), rac-5 (9.680 g, 86.4 mmol) and MTBE (285 mL) were stirred at r.t. After the more mobile enantiomer was consumed (chiral HPLC, ca. 47 h) the mixture was filtered and evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (75 g, hexanes–EtOAc, 7:3 and then 6:4) to give: (1) (R)-5-acetate: oil, yield: 7.321 g (55%, 90.5:9.5 er), (2) (S)-5: oil, yield: 4.360 g (45%, 99.5:0.5 er), [α]D 22 –30.9 (c = 1.16, CHCl3); {Lit.30 [α]D 25 –30.08 (c = 1.21, CHCl3)}. Recycling of (R)-5-Acetate: (R)-5-Acetate (er 90.5:9.5, 7.321 g, 47.5 mmol) was hydrolyzed (K2CO3 in MeOH, 0 °C) and the crude (R)-5 (4.810 mg, 90%) was obtained. This product was treated with Ph3P (12.94 g, 49.3 mmol), HCO2H (98%, 1.86 mL, 49.3 mmol) and DEAD (40% in toluene, 21.5 mL, 49.3 mmol) in THF to give the formate (5.554 g, 92%). The latter was hydrolyzed (K2CO3 in MeOH, 0 °C) and thus obtained (S)-5 (90.5:9.5 er, 4.309 g, 97%) was subjected to resolution using Novozym 435® (8.8 mg) and isopropenyl acetate (12.5 mL, 114 mmol) in MTBE (125 mL) to give: (1) (R)- and (S)-5-acetates (1.349 g, 23%), (2) (S)-5, (3.349 g, er 99.6:0.4, 77%). The total yield of (S)-5 (er ≥99.5:0.5), from rac-5 amounted to 80%.
  • 34 Corey EJ, Boaz NW. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985; 26: 6019
  • 35 Alexakis A, Berlan J, Besace Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986; 27: 1047
  • 36 Horiguchi Y, Matsuzawa S, Nakamura E, Kuwajima I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986; 27: 4025
  • 37 Csákÿ AG, Mba M, Plumet J. J. Org. Chem. 2001; 66: 9026
  • 38 Otera J, Fujita Y, Fukuzumi S, Hirai K, Gu J, Nakai T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995; 36: 95
  • 39 Michalak K, Wicha J. Pol. J. Chem. 2004; 78: 205
  • 40 Kobayashi S, Murakami M, Mukaiyama T. Chem. Lett. 1985; 1535
  • 41 Mukaiyama T, Tamura M, Kobayashi S. Chem. Lett. 1986; 1817

    • Synthesis of 10 from 6:
    • 42a Allylmagnesium bromide (1.30 M in Et2O, 42.0 mL, 55.9 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of anhyd LiBr (5.69 g, 65.5 mmol) and CuI (12.48 g, 65.5 mmol) in THF (70 mL) at –78 °C. After 0.5 h, TMSCl (7.0 mL, 55.9 mmol) and 6 (2.75 g, 21.8 mmol) were added. The suspension was stirred at –78 °C for additional 1 h, allowed to warm to r.t. (in ca. 20 min), briefly stirred at that temperature (ca. 10 min) and cooled to 0 °C. Et3N (20 mL), and hexanes (200 mL) were added and the slurry was set aside for ca. 15 min. The liquid layer was decanted from a semisolid mass into brine and sat. aq NaHCO3 (1:1, 50 mL). The organic layer was separated, washed with brine and dried. The solvent was evaporated and the residue was distilled using a Kügelrohr apparatus (120 °C/1.5 mmHg) to give a mixture of 7 and 8 (oil, 4.39 g, 84% yield, 90:10 by 1H NMR). Compound 7: 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ = 5.68–5.82 (m, 1 H), 4.96–5.08 (m, 2 H), 3.59 (ddd, J = 7.2, 3.2, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.27 (s, 3 H), 2.44–2.58 (m, 2 H), 2.18–2.36 (m, 2 H), 2.03 (ddd, J = 14.0, 7.2, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.50 (br s, 3 H), 0.17 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz): 144.0, 136.4, 116.2, 113.8, 81.6, 56.1, 50.9, 39.1, 36.2, 10.1, 0.5. cis-Isomer, 8: 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ = 3.90 (ddd, J = 6.8, 6.8, 6.8 Hz, 1 H).
    • 42b To a solution of 7/8 (90:10, 240 mg, 1 mmol) and 9 (170 mg, 1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL), stirred at –45 °C to –40 °C, TrSbCl6 (28 mg, 0.05 mmol, 5 mol%) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at –45 °C to –40 °C for 4 h and then the reaction was quenched with H2O (0.1 mL). The mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. Anhyd Na2SO4 was added to bind H2O, the solid was filtered off and washed with hexanes–CH2Cl2 (1:1, 3 × 3 mL). The filtrates were combined and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (12 g) using EtOAc–hexanes (15:85, ca. 300 mL) to give 10 as an oil; yield: 229 mg (68%); [α]D 18 +67.9 (c = 1.34, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ = 5.83 (dddd, J = 6.8, 8.0, 10.2, 16.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.07 (ddd, J = 16.8, 4.8, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.01 (ddd, J = 10.2, 1.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.59 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.66 (ddd, J = 7.6, 7.6, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.32 (s, 3 H), 2.75 (dd, J = 18.4, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.47 (ddd, J = 17.2, 10.8, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.10–2.35 (m, 4 H), 1.97 (ddd, J = 7.6, 7.6, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.88 (ddd, J = 14.4, 10.8, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.77 (ddd, J = 14.4, 10.8, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.24 (s, 9 H), 0.91 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz): δ = 218.7, 203.4, 177.8, 136.6, 116.3, 80.2, 67.7, 57.5, 51.8, 48.9, 43.2, 38.7, 33.7, 33.1, 29.5, 27.1, 18.3. HRMS: m/z [M+] calcd for C19H30O5: 338.20932; found: 338.20989.
  • 43 Shibata I, Kano T, Kanazawa N, Fukuoka S, Baba A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 1389
  • 44 Scholl M, Ding S, Lee CW, Grubbs RH. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 953
  • 45 Garber SB, Kingsbury JS, Gray BL, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 8168
  • 46 Gessler S, Randl S, Blechert S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 9973
  • 47 Transformation of 10 into 12 was carried out essentially as described earlier for a similar compound.20 Compound 11: oil, yield: 451 mg (85%); [α]D 19 +81.3 (c = 1.24, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ = 5.83 (dddd, J = 6.8, 8.0, 10.2, 16.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.07 (ddd, J = 16.8, 4.8, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.01 (ddd, J = 10.2, 1.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.96 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.89 (s, 1 H), 4.45 (d, J = 0.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.66 (ddd, J = 7.6, 7.6, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.32 (s, 3h), 2.75 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.30–2.38 (m, 1 H), 2.00–2.25 (m, 4 H), 1.74–1.84 (m, 2 H), 1.48–1.59 (m, 1 H), 1.19 (s, 9 H), 0.90 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz): δ = 218.6, 178.0, 143.7, 136.8, 116.1, 112.0, 80.3, 66.3, 57.5, 52.8, 47.5, 43.4, 38.7, 34.4, 33.15, 28.0, 27.1, 18.9. HRMS: m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C20H32O4: 359.21928; found: 359.21968. Compound 12: oil; yield: 307 mg (94%); [α]D 17 +129.5 (c = 1.17, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ = 5.78 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.36 (s, 2 H), 3.64 (ddd, J = 10.0, 7.6, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 2.84 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.52 (ddd, J = 16.4, 8.0, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.02–2.20 (m, 4 H), 1.92 (ddd, J = 14.0, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.78–1.88 (m, 1 H), 1.29–1.38 (m, 1 H), 1.16 (s, 9 H), 0.88 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz): δ = 217.6, 178.2, 136.9, 127.8, 79.2, 70.8, 58.0, 52.5, 51.5, 42.2, 38.8, 32.9, 27.1, 25.5, 24.6, 14.4. HRMS: m/z [M+] calcd for C18H28O4: 308.19876; found: 308.19741. Preparation of the ‘Basic tert-Butanol’ Reagent: KOH (200 mg) and H2O (0.4 mL) were added to t-BuOH (20 mL) and the mixture was vigorously stirred for 1 h at r.t. The mixture was set aside for 16 h. The upper layer was used for the elimination reaction. ‘Basic tert-butanol’ (7 mL) was added to 12 (106 mg), the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 20 min and then partitioned between hexanes (60 mL) and H2O (50 mL). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with hexanes (20 mL). The combined organic extract was washed with brine, dried and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (yield: 3 g, hexanes–EtOAc, 9:1) to give 3 (oil, 86 mg, 91%); [α]D 19 +24.2 (c = 2.03, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ = 7.34 (dd, J = 5.6, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.08 (dd, J = 6.0, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.77 (br d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (s, 2 H), 2.86 (ddd, J = 15.2, 2.0, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.47 (ddd, J = 17.2, 5.6, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.37 (dt, J = 17.6, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.14–2.29 (m, 2 H), 2.01 (ddd, J = 14.0, 6.0, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.53 (ddd, J = 16.0, 10.4, 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.18 (s, 9 H), 1.00 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz): δ = 213.6, 178.2, 162.9, 135.3, 131.2, 127.2, 71.7, 51.4, 51.0, 38.8, 30.9, 28.5, 27.1, 26.6, 18.4; in agreement with the spectra of racemic material (ref. 20).