Synlett 2011(18): 2701-2704  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1289552
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Swern Oxidation of Alcohols with Ion-Supported Methyl Sulfoxide and Oxalyl Chloride

Daisuke Tsuchiya, Katsuhiko Moriyama, Hideo Togo*
Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, Yayoi-cho 1-33, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Received 24 August 2011
Publication Date:
19 October 2011 (online)

Abstract

The oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols with ion-supported methyl sulfoxide and oxalyl chloride in the presence of triethylamine in dichloromethane efficiently proceeded to give the corresponding aldehydes and ketones, respectively, in good yields with high purity. Isolation of the product was achieved very easily by simple diethyl ether extraction of the reaction mixture and subsequent removal of solvent from the extract. The reaction did not produce any unpleasant odor. Furthermore, ion-supported methyl sulfide was recovered in good yield and could be re-oxidized to ion-supported methyl sulfoxide for reuse in the same oxidation.

    References and Notes

  • 1a Trost BM. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1995,  34:  259 
  • 1b Sheldon RA. Chem. Ind.  1997,  12 
  • 1c Kolb HC. Finn MG. Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  2004 
  • 2a Mancuso AJ. Huang SL. Swern D. J. Org. Chem.  1978,  43:  2480 
  • 2b Omura K. Swern D. Tetrahedron  1978,  34:  1651 
  • 2c Mancuso AJ. Swern D. Synthesis  1981,  165 
  • 2d Tidwell TT. Synthesis  1990,  857 
  • 2e Tidwell TT. Org. React.  1990,  39:  297 
  • 2f Rose NGW. Blaskovich MA. Evindar G. Wilkinson S. Luo Y. Org. Synth.  2002,  79:  216 
  • 2g Pichlmair S. Margues MMB. Green MP. Martin HJ. Mulzer J. Org. Lett.  2003,  5:  4657 
  • 2h Ahmad NM. Name Reactions for Functional Group Transformations   Li JJ. Corey EJ. Wiley; New York: 2007.  p.291 
  • 3 Liu Y. Vederas JC. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  7856 
  • 4a Crich D. Neelamkavil S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  7449 
  • 4b Crich D. Neelamkavil S. Tetrahedron  2002,  58:  3865 
  • 5a Nishide K. Ohsugi S. Fudesaka M. Kodama S. Node M. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  5177 
  • 5b Ohsugi S. Nishide K. Ohno K. Okuyama K. Fudesaka M. Kodama S. Node M. Tetrahedron  2003,  59:  8393 
  • 6a Harris JM. Liu Y. Chai S. Andrews MD. Vederas JC. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  2407 
  • 6b Choi MKW. Toy PH. Tetrahedron  2003,  59:  7171 
  • 7a Akiike J. Yamamoto Y. Togo HH. Synlett  2007,  2168 
  • 7b Ishiwata Y. Togo H. Tetrahedron Lett.  2009,  50:  5354 
  • 7c Kawano Y. Togo H. Tetrahedron  2009,  65:  6251 
  • 8a Imura Y. Shimojuh N. Togo H. Tetrahedron  2010,  66:  3421 
  • 8b Shimojuh N. Imura Y. Moriyama K. Togo H. Tetrahedron  2011,  67:  951 
  • 9a

    Preparation of 6-mercaptohexan-1-ol: Thiourea (270 mmol) and KI (90 mmol) were added to a solution of 6-chlorohexan-1-ol (180 mmol) in EtOH (150 mL) at r.t., and the mixture was heated at reflux for 14 h. Then, aq NaOH (2.7 m, 270 mmol, 100 mL) was added to the mixture, which was then heated at reflux for 3 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to r.t., and neutralized with aq HCl (1 M, 200 mL). The mixture was extracted with Et2O (2 × 300 mL) and the combined organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in Et2O (200 mL) and the mixture was filtered. The filtrate was concen-trated to give 6-mercaptohexan-1-ol as an oil. IR (neat): 3348, 2555, 1054 cm; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.34-1.47 (m, 5 H), 1.54-1.67 (m, 4 H), 1.84 (s, 1 H), 2.54 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.64 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 24.49, 25.17, 28.05, 32.53, 33.86, 62.76.

  • 9b

    Preparation of 6-(methylthio)hexan-1-ol: MeI (189 mmol) was added to a solution of 6-mercaptohexan-1-ol (180 mmol) and K2CO3 (198 mmol) in DMF (160 mL) at 0 ˚C, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. The reaction mixture was filtered and concentrated, then H2O (150 mL) was added to the residue, which was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 200 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by distillation (85-95 ˚C/1.0 mmHg) gave 6-(methylthio)hexan-1-ol (66% yield from 6-chlorohexan-1-ol) as an oil. IR (neat): 3365, 1055 cm; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.34-1.47 (m, 4 H), 1.55-1.67 (m, 5 H), 2.10 (s, 3 H), 2.50 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.64 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.47, 25.32, 28.49, 29.01, 32.57, 34.14, 62.76.

  • 9c

    Preparation of 6-(methylthio)hexyl 4′-methyl-benzenesulfonate: p-TsCl (72 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (60 mL) was added to a solution of 6-(methylthio)hexan-1-ol (60 mmol), Et3N (90 mmol) and Me3N˙HCl (6.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (60 mL) at 0 ˚C, and the obtained mixture was stirred for 1 h. H2O (100 mL) was added to the reaction mixture, which was neutralized with 1 M HCl and extracted with EtOAc (2 × 200 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with H2O, brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concen-trated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-EtOAc, 4:1; R f = 0.4) to give 6-(methylthio)hexyl p-toluenesulfonate (95% yield) as an oil. IR (neat): 1360, 1175 cm; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.31-1.37 (m, 4 H), 1.51-1.68 (m, 4 H), 2.07
    (s, 3 H), 2.44 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 2.45 (s, 3 H), 4.02 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.39, 21.52, 24.89, 27.92, 28.60, 28.72, 33.93, 70.41, 127.75, 129.72, 133.05, 144.60.

  • 9d

    Preparation of 1-Methyl-3-[6′-(methylthio)hexyl]-1 H -imidazol-3-ium p -Toluenesulfonate (Ion-Supported Methyl Sulfide): 1-Methylimidazole (33 mmol) was added to a solution of 6-(methylthio)hexyl p-toluenesulfonate (30 mmol) in MeCN (30 mL) at r.t., and the mixture was stirred at 60 ˚C for 48 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was washed with Et2O (3 × 100 mL) to give ion-supported methyl sulfide (99% yield) as an oil. IR (neat): 1191, 1034 cm; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
    δ = 1.19-1.38 (m, 4 H), 1.48-1.56 (m, 2 H), 1.73-1.81 (m, 2 H), 2.07 (s, 3 H), 2.34 (s, 3 H), 2.43 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 4.14 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.41 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.74 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 9.59 (s, 1 H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.41, 21.20, 25.64, 27.87, 28.62, 29.95, 33.89, 36.25, 49.63, 121.81, 123.52, 125.71, 128.61, 137.51, 139.36, 143.56.

  • 9e

    Preparation of 3-Methyl-1-[6′-(methylsulfinyl)-hexyl]-1 H -imidazolium p -Toluenesulfonate (Ion-Supported Methyl Sulfoxide): H2O2 (30% in H2O, 1.47 mL, 48 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of ion-supported methyl sulfide {1-methyl-3-[6′-(methylthio)hexyl]-
    1H-imidazol-3-ium p-toluenesulfonate; 7.69 g, 20 mmol} in AcOH-THF (2:1, 45 mL) at 0 ˚C, and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 2 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with aq sat. Na2SO3, and concentrated in vacuo. The obtained mixture was dissolved in CH2Cl2, dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. After removal of the solvent, ion-supported methyl sulfoxide was obtained (99% yield) as an oil; IR (neat): 1034 cm; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.28-1.49 (m, 4 H), 1.67-1.86 (m, 4 H), 2.34 (s, 3 H), 2.55 (s, 3 H), 2.68 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 4.19 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.36-7.38 (m, 2 H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 9.63 (s, 1 H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.21, 22.06, 25.37, 27.59, 29.59, 36.25, 38.30, 49.49, 53.79, 121.96, 123.38, 125.71, 128.64, 137.63, 139.48, 143.43; HMRS (APPI): m/z [M+] calcd for C11H21ON2S: 229.1369; found: 229.1357

10

General Procedure for the Swern Oxidation using Ion-Supported Methyl Sulfoxide: Oxalyl chloride (0.34 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of ion-supported methyl sulfoxide (1.60 g, 4.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (6 mL) at -70 ˚C and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at the same temperature. A solution of alcohol (2.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added dropwise at -70 ˚C and the obtained mixture was stirred for 30 min. Triethylamine (1.66 mL, 12 mmol) was added dropwise at -70 ˚C and the mixture was stirred for
1 h at the same temperature. The resulting mixture was warmed to -60 ˚C and stirred for 1.5 h at the same temperature. The mixture was warmed to -50 ˚C and stirred for 1 h at the same temperature. Finally, the mixture was warmed to r.t. by removing the cooling bath and stirred for
2 h at the same temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched with H2O (10 mL), neutralized (pH 6-7) with aq 1 M HCl, and extracted with Et2O (2 × 40 mL). The organic layer was washed with H2O (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. After removal of the solvent, aldehyde or ketone was obtained. The purity was estimated by ¹H NMR analysis.
Most of the aldehydes and ketones obtained in this study are commercially available and were identified by comparison with the authentic materials (see the Supporting Information; mp, IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR).
The aqueous layer was concentrated in vacuo. After the addition of aq sat. NaHCO3, ion-supported methyl sulfide was extracted with CHCl3 (3 × 40 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and filtered. After removal of the solvent, the residue was washed with Et2O (2 × 10 mL), and concentrated in vacuo to provide ion-supported methyl sulfide (˜73% yield). The recovered ion-supported methyl sulfide was quantitatively oxidized to the corresponding ion-supported methyl sulfoxide with hydrogen peroxide in a mixture of AcOH and THF, as described above.