RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1274543
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Das obstruktive Defäkationssyndrom – chirurgische Behandlungskonzepte
Surgical options in the treatment of the obstructed defaecation syndromePublikationsverlauf
eingereicht: 1.6.2010
akzeptiert: 18.11.2010
Publikationsdatum:
16. März 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Die chronische Obstipation beschreibt einen Symptomkomplex, hinter dem sich zahlreiche Diagnosen verstecken. Ihre Diagnose und Therapie benötigt eine interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit. Die operative Behandlung ist die Therapie der Wahl für strukturelle Ursachen. Für diese Übersicht wurde Literatur aufgearbeitet und eigene klinische Erfahrungen dokumentiert. Wichtigste Indikation zur Behandlung einer chronischen Obstipation ist der subjektive Leidensdruck des Patienten. Dieser kann durch klinische Scores objektiviert werden. Mit Hilfe apparativer Diagnostik z. B. Defäkographie lässt sich die Pathologie feststellen. Die chirurgische Behandlung dient der Wiederherstellung der Anatomie des Darms und ist somit die Therapie der Wahl bei strukturellen Veränderungen. Postoperative Ergebnisse werden durch Defäkographie und Lifestyle Skala kontrolliert und zeigen eine signifikante Beschwerdebesserung mit durchaus akzeptablen Komplikationen.
Chronic constipation is a symptom complex caused by a wide variety of diseases. Primary causes of constipation, including enterocele, rectocele, rectum prolaps and intussusception, involve changes of the bowel which either delay or prevent the passage of bowel content. This condition has been termed „obstructed defaecation syndrome” (ODS).
This article is based on clinical experience and a review of selected literature. The complexity of chronic constipation warrants interdisciplinary work-up and treatment. The diagnostic work-up includes taking a focus on the history of patientŽs complaints. This can be objectified using a standardized scoring system, e. g. Longo score. Gynaecological examinations must be performed on all female patients. Intraluminal abnormalities are best excluded by colonoscopy and rectoscopy. An abnormal score in combination with negative findings on endoscopy and gynaecologic examinations warrant a radiological assessment with a defaecogramm in symptomatic patients. Treatment is usually medical, involving changes in life style, bowel habits and the use of laxatives. Biofeedback has been shown to be effective in some patients. Surgery is indicated for selected patient who do not improve after medical treatment. A range of surgical procedures have been shown to be effective in the treatmetn of chronic constipation. The minimal invasive double stapled trans anal rectum resection (STARR procedure) has been proven effective in treating rectocele and rectum prolaps in selected patients. The advantages of the STARR procedure include: short hospital stay, reduced postoperative pain and an early return to work. We consider this procedure as safe and effective when performed by a well trained surgeon in selected patients.
Schlüsselwörter
obstruktives Defäkationssyndrom - STARR - Rektozele - Intussuszeption - Longo Score
Keywords
obstructed defaecation syndrome - STARR - rectocele - intussusception - Longo score
Literatur
- 1
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J. et al .
A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation
and management of constipated patients.
Dis Colon Rectum.
1996;
39
681-685
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Bremmer S, Mellgren A, Holmstrom B. et al .
Peritoneocele and enterecele. Formation
and transformation during rectal evacuation as studied by means
of defaeco-peritoneography.
Acta Radiol.
1998;
39
167-175
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A. et al .
Stapled transanal rectal resection for
outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial.
Dis
Colon Rectum.
2004;
47
1285-1297
MissingFormLabel
- 4
D’Hoore A, Penninckx F.
Obstructed defecation.
Colorectal Disc.
2003;
5
280-287
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G. et al .
Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation
after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation.
Tech Coloproctol.
2003;
7
148-153
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Gilliland R, Heymen S, Altomare D F. et al .
Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback
for constipation.
Br J Surg.
1997;
84
1123-1126
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Healy J C, Halligan S, Reznek R H. et al .
Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation
proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic
floor movement.
AJR.
1997;
169
775-779
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Higgins P D, Johanson J F.
Epidemiology
of constipation in North America: a systemic review.
Am
J Gastroenterol.
2004;
99
750-759
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Lau C W, Heymen S, Alabaz O. et al .
Prognostic signifi cance of rectocele, intussusception,
and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated
patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction.
Dis
Colon Rectum.
2000;
43
478-482
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Lembo A, Camillera M.
Chronic constipation.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
349
1360-1368
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Marat K, Wexner S D.
Treatment strategies
in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.
World
J Gastroenterol.
2006;
12
3168-3173
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Mellgren A, Bremmer S.
Defecography, results
of investigation in 2816 patients.
Dis Colon Rectum.
1994;
37
1133-1141
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Schwandner O. et al .
Decision-making Algorithm for the STARR
procedure in Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Position statement
of the group of STARR Pioneers.
Surg Innov.
2008;
15
105-109
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C. et al .
Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled
transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defecation.
Int
J Colorectal Dis.
2005;
20
83-85
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Rao S S, Welcher K D, Leistikow J S.
Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal
coordination.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1998;
93
1042-1050
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Reboa. et
al .
The Impact of STARR on anorectal Function in Patients
with ODS.
Dis Colon Rectum.
2009;
52
1598-1604
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch H P.
Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation
caused by rectocele and rectoanal intussusception.
Viszeralchirurgie.
2005;
40
331-341
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Schwandner O, Fürst A.
German STARR
Registry. Preliminary results of a prospective, multicenter observational
study.
Coloproctology.
2007;
29
13-21
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Müller-Lissner S.
Obstipation – Pathophysiologie,
Diagnose und Therapie.
Dtsch Arztebl Int.
2009;
106
424-432
MissingFormLabel
- 20 Wexner S, Duthie G. Constipation: etiology,
evaluation and management . (2nd ed in press) London: Springer.
MissingFormLabel
Dr. med. Peter Ambe
Chirurgische Klinik
St. Elisabeth Kreiskrankenhaus
Grevenbroich
Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RTWA Aachen
Von-Werth-Str. 5
41515 Grevenbroich
eMail: Peter.ambe@kkh-ne.de