Download PDF
Synlett 2010(5): 712-714  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1219379
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

(1R,5R)-1-(1′-Dimethylaminoethyl)-2-isopropylidene-5-methylcyclohexanol as a Chiral Ligand in the Enantioselective Addition of Diethylzinc to Aldehydes

Ashok K. Yadav*, Manoj Kumar, Tripti Yadav, Renuka Jain
Department of Chemistry, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur 302055, India
Fax: +91(141)2700364; e-Mail: drakyada@yahoo.co.in;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 13 August 2009
Publication Date:
08 February 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

An efficient chiral ligand, (1R,5R)-1-(1′-dimethylaminoethyl)-2-isopropylidene-5-methylcyclohexanol, has been developed for the enantioselective addition of diethylzinc to some prochiral aldehydes to afford S-alcohols. The overall conversion rate was 80-98% with excellent enantiomeric excess (79-98%).

Key words

ionic liquid - intermolecular reductive coupling - prochiral aldehydes - chiral ligand - enantioselectivity

    References and Notes

  • 1a Noyori R. Kitamura M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1991,  30:  49 
    Google Scholar
  • 1b Soai K. Niwa S. Chem. Rev.  1992,  92:  833 
    Google Scholar
  • 1c Pu L. Yu HB. Chem. Rev.  2001,  101:  757 
    Google Scholar
  • 1d Zhu HJ. Jiang JX. Ren J. Yan YM. Pittman CU. Curr. Org. Synth.  2005,  2:  547 
    Google Scholar
  • 1e Hatano M. Miyamoto T. Ishihara K. Curr. Org. Chem.  2007,  11:  127 
    Google Scholar
  • 2a Kitamura M. Suga S. Kawai K. Noyori R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1986,  108:  6071 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Cho BT. Chun YS. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1998,  9:  1489 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Joshi SN. Malhotra SV. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2003,  14:  1763 
    Google Scholar
  • 2d Parrott RW. Hitchcock SR. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2008,  19:  19 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 2e Sachi P. Dabiri M. Kozehgary G. Heydari S. Synth. Commun.  2009,  39:  2575 
    Google Scholar
  • 2f Binder C. Bautista A. Zaidlewicz M. Kizeminski MP. Oliver A. Singaram B. J. Org. Chem.  2009,  74:  2337 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 2g Ichikawa Y. Yamamoto S. Kotsuki H. Nokano K. Synlett  2009,  2281 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 3a Anderson JC. Harding M. Chem. Commun.  1998,  393 
    Google Scholar
  • 3b Tseng SL. Yang TK. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2005,  16:  773 
    Google Scholar
  • 3c Tseng SL. Yang TK. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2004,  15:  3375 
    Google Scholar
  • 4a Chelucci G. Conti S. Falorni M. Giacomelli G. Tetrahedron  1991,  47:  8251 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Weselinski L. Stephiak P. Jurczak J. Synlett  2009,  2261 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 5a Cardellicchio C. Ciccarella G. Naso F. Perna F. Tortorella P. Tetrahedron  1999,  55:  14685 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b Liu DX. Zhang LC. Wang Q. Da C S. Xin ZQ. Wang R. Choi CKM. Chan ASC. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  2733 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Yand X. Hirose T. Zhang G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2008,  19:  1670 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 6a Bolm C. Zehnder M. Bur D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1990,  29:  205 
    Google Scholar
  • 6b Cheng YQ. Zheng B. Kang CQ. Guo HQ. Gao LX. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2008,  19:  1572 
    Google Scholar
  • 7a Palmieri G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2000,  11:  3361 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Yang XF. Wang ZH. Koshizawa T. Yasutake M. Zhang GY. Hirose T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2007,  18:  1257 
    Google Scholar
  • 8a Yang XW. Sheng JH. Da C S. Wang HS. Su W. Wang R. Chan ASC. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  295 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Guo S. Judesh ZMA. Tetrahedron Lett.  2009,  50:  281 
    Google Scholar
  • 9a Chiral Auxilliaries and Ligands in Asymmetric Synthesis   Seyden JP. John Wiley and Sons; New York: 1995. 
    Google Scholar
  • 9b Blaser HU. Chem. Rev.  1992,  92:  935 
    Google Scholar
  • 9c Dabiri M. Salehi P. Kozehgary G. Heydari S. Heydari A. Esfandyari M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2008,  19:  1970 
    Google Scholar
  • 10a Zhang FY. Chan ASC. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1997,  8:  3651 
    Google Scholar
  • 10b Hwang CD. Uang BJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1998,  9:  3979 
    Google Scholar
  • 10c Dean MA. Hitchcock SR. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2008,  19:  2563 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 12 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate was synthesized according to the reported method, see: Palimkar SS. Siddiqui SA. Daniel T. Lahoti RJ. Srinivasan KV. J. Org. Chem.  2003,  68:  9371 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hesse G. Hagel R. Chromatographia  1976,  9:  62 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kitamura M. Okada S. Noyori R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1989,  111:  4028 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Picard RH. Kenyon J. J. Chem. Soc.  1914,  1115 
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Sato T. Gotoh Y. Wakebayashi Y. Fugisawe T. Tetrahedron Lett.  1983,  24:  4123 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Smaardijk AA. Wynberg H. J. Org. Chem.  1987,  52:  135 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Capillon J. Guette J. Tetrahedron  1979,  35:  1817 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mukaiyama T. Hojo K. Chem. Lett.  1976,  893 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
11

Typical Experimental Procedure for Preparative-Scale Electrosynthesis
The electrolysis was carried out in a double-walled cell (Metrohm, 100 ml) equipped with cover glass inlet and outlet, thermometer, and magnetic stirrer. This cell was divided by a medium-porosity glass frit into two separate compartments. The catholyte was a 10 mL mixture of [BMIM]BF4-i-PrOH (9:1) containing 0.03 M (R)-(+)-pulegone and 0.04 M of MeCN. The anolyte was 5 mL of [BMIM]BF4-i-PrOH (9:1). A smooth copper foil (1 × 1 cm) was used as a cathode and a platinum foil (1 × 1 cm) was used as an anode. Nitrogen gas was bubbled for 10 min and the electroreductive coupling was carried out by passing current 0.1 A for the time corresponding to charge-transfer equivalent to 1.1 F/mol.
The catholyte was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL), the extract dried over anhyd MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed by distillation under reduced pressure. The product so obtained was purified by chromatography on a swollen triacetyl cellulose(microcrystalline) column, and elution was performed by EtOH to afford 1a in pure form in 70% yield. R f = 0.55 (hexane-EtOAc, 10:1). IR (neat): ν = 3460, 1700, 1640, 880 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 1.05 (d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3) 1.28 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.60 (m, 1 H, CH), 1.65 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.70 (s, 6 H, 2 × CH3), 1.95 (m, 2 H, CH2), 2.10 (s, 3 H, COCH3), 3.80 (s, 1 H, OH). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.60, 19.20, 20.50, 21.60, 25.60, 38.40, 42.40, 92.50, 125.30, 142.70, 207.10. Anal. Calcd for C12H20O2: C, 73.41; H, 10.27. Found: C, 73.62; H, 10.12.

14

Compound 1a was heated to reflux with O-methyloxime hydrochloride in the presence of 0.03 M Et3N in EtOH. Removal of the solvent gave the oximated product which, upon lithium aluminium hydride reduction, afforded compound 1d in 90% yield. Compound 1d, when refluxed with 2 mol of MeI resulted in the desired chiral ligand 1e in 95% yield; bp 150-153 ˚C (67 mbar); R f = 0.4 (hexane-EtOAc, 1:1). IR (neat): ν = 3855, 2780, 1645, 886 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.05 (d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3), 1.12 (d, 3 H, J = 7.1 Hz, CH3), 1.30-1.42 (m, 4 H, 2 × CH2), 1.62 (m, 1 H, CH), 1.75 (m, 6 H, 2 × CH3), 1.95 (m, 2 H, CH2), 2.30 (s, 6 H, 2 × CH3), 2.95 [q, 1 H, J = 7.1 Hz, CHN(CH3)2], 3.85 (s, 1 H, OH). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.10, 19.20, 20.60, 22.40, 26.20, 37.25, 39.50, 44.15, 66.50, 78.30, 125.20, 142.70. Anal. Calcd for C14H27ON: C, 74.59; H, 12.08; N, 6.21. Found: C, 74.43; H, 11.84; N, 5.96.

21

Representative Spectroscopic Data( S )-1-phenylpropan-1-ol (4a)
Bp 94-95 (13.3 mbar); R f = 0.35 (hexane-EtOAc, 8:2). IR (neat): ν = 3400, 3020, 2990, 1600, 1100 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.90 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.40-1.55 (m, 2 H, CH2CH3), 3.60 (br s, 1 H, OH), 4.50 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H, CHOH), 7.10-7.40 (m, 5 H, ArH). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 11.10, 33.10, 78.20, 124.60, 128.40, 128.80, 139.20. Anal. Calcd for C9H12O: C, 79.36; H, 8.88. Found: C, 79.55; H, 8.70.
( S )-3-Nonanol (4e)
Bp 192-194 ˚C; R f = 0.40 (hexane-EtOAc, 8:2). IR (neat):
ν = 3600, 2970, 1350, 1100 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.90 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 0.95 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.20-1.62 (m, 12 H, 6 × CH2), 2.20 (br s, 1 H, OH), 3.25 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H, CHOH). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 11.00, 15.30, 22.40, 25.20, 29.80, 30.60, 33.10, 38.40, 75.50. Anal. Calcd for C9H20O: C, 74.92; H, 13.98. Found: C, 74.75; H, 13.80.