PDF herunterladen
Synlett 2009(13): 2115-2118  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1217552
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

CaSH Organocatalysis: Enantioselective Friedel-Crafts Alkylation of Indoles with α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes

Tian Tiana,b, Bao-Jian Peia, Qing-Hua Lia, Hao Hea, Ling-Yan Chena, Xiang Zhoub, Wing-Hong Chana, Albert W. M. Lee*a
a Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, P. R. of China
Fax: +85234117438; e-Mail: alee@hkbu.edu.hk;
b College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Hubei, P. R. of China
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 1 April 2009
Publikationsdatum:
10. Juli 2009 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik
Preview

Abstract

Enantioselective Friedel-Crafts alkylation of indole with α,β-unsaturated aldehyde was catalyzed by camphor sulfonyl hydrazine (CaSH) with good enantioselectivity (81-88%).

Key words

camphor sulfonyl hydrazine (CaSH) - organocatalysis - indole alkylation - α,β-unsaturated aldehydes

    References and Notes

  • 1a Ahrendt KA. Borths CJ. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  4243 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 1b A similar term ‘organic catalysis’ first appeared in the German literature: Langenbeck W. Fortschr. Chem. Forsch.  1966,  6:  301 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2a Eder U. Sauer G. Wiechert R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1971,  10:  496 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2b Hajos ZG. Parrish DR. J. Org. Chem.  1974,  39:  1615 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3a Alessandro D. Alessandro M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2008,  47:  4638 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3b List B. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  5413 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3c Dalko PI. Moisan L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  5138 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3d France S. Guerin DJ. Miller SJ. Lectka T. Chem. Rev.  2003,  103:  2985 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3e Dalko PI. Moisan L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  3726 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4a Notz W. Tanaka F. Barbas CF. Acc. Chem. Res.  2004,  37:  580 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4b Taylor MS. Jacobsen EN. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2006,  45:  1520 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Poulsen TB. Jørgensen KA. Chem. Rev.  2008,  108:  2903 
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6a Bandini M. Molloni A. Umani-Ronchi A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  550 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6b Austin JF. Kim S.-G. Sinz CJ. Xiao W.-J. MacMillan DWC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.  2004,  101:  5482 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7a Erkkilä A. Majander I. Pihko PM. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  5416 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7b Mukherjee S. Yang JW. Hoffmann S. List B. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  5471 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7c Juhl K. Jørgensen KA. . Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2003,  42:  1498 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7d Seayad J. List B. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2005,  3:  719 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7e Northrup AB. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  2458 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8a Austin JF. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  1172 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8b Paras NA. MacMillan DWC.
    J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  4370 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8c Paras NA. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  7894 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8d Huang Y. Walji AM. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2005,  127:  15051 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9a King HD. Meng Z. Denhart D. Mattson R. Kimura R. Wu D. Gao Q. Macor JE. Org. Lett.  2005,  7:  3437 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9b Li C.-F. Liu H. Liao J. Cao Y.-J. Liu X.-P. Xiao W.-J. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  1847 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 10a Chen W. Du W. Chen YC. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2007,  5:  816 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 10b Bartoli G. Bosco M. Melchiorre P. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  1403 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11a Sander EG. Jencks WP. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1968,  90:  6154 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11b Cavill JL. Elliott RL. Evans G. Jones IL. Platts JA. Ruda AM. Tomkinson NCO. Tetrahedron  2006,  62:  410 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12a Cavill JL. Peters JU. Tomkinson NCO. Chem. Commun.  2003,  728 
  • 12b Gupta RR. Kumar M. Gupta V. Heterocyclic Chemistry   Vol. 3:  Springer; Heidelberg: 1999. 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12c Lemay M. Ogilvie WW. Org. Lett.  2005,  7:  4141 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12d Lemay M. Ogilvie WW. J. Org. Chem.  2006,  71:  4663 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12e Lemay M. Aumand L. Ogilvie WW. Adv. Synth. Catal.  2007,  349:  441 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13a He H. Pei B.-J. Chou H.-H. Tian T. Chan W.-W. Lee AW.-M. Org. Lett.  2008,  10:  2421 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13b Langlois Y. Petit A. Remy P. Scherrmann MC. Kouklovsky C. Tetrahedron Lett.  2008,  49:  5576 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13c Chen L.-Y. He H. Pei B.-J. Chan WH. Lee AWM. Synthesis  2009, 1573
14

Aldehyde 3 (R¹ = Me): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.75 (s, 1 H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.31 (m, 1 H), 7.26 (m, 1 H), 7.14 (m, 1 H), 6.84 (s, 1 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.68 (m, 1 H), 2.87 (m, 1 H), 2.71 (m, 1 H), 1.43 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 203.1, 137.4, 126.8, 125.4, 121.9, 119.3, 119.0, 109.6, 51.2, 32.9, 26.1, 21.9 ppm.
Alcohol 4 was obtained by NaBH4 reduction. Alcohol 4 (R¹ = Me): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.64 (dd, J = 8.0, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.30 (dd, J = 7.2, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.23 (m, 1 H), 7.10 (m, 1 H), 6.85 (s, 1 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.66 (m, 1 H), 3.22 (m, 1 H), 2.06 (m, 1 H), 1.96 (m, 1 H), 1.40 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H) ppm.

15

General Experimental Procedure for CaSH 1 Catalyzed Friedel-Crafts Reaction of Indoles with α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes
TFA (0.15 mmol) was added to a solution of CaSH 1 (0.15 mmol) in toluene (1 mL). The solution was stirred for 20 min and then cooled to -40 ˚C. The α,β-unsaturated aldehyde (1.5 mmol) was then added. After stirring for another 20 min, the N-substituted indole (0.5 mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred until complete consumption of the indoles as determined by TLC. MeOH (2 mL) was added to the reaction mixture followed by NaBH4 (3.0 mmol). The mixture was warmed to 0 ˚C and stirred for 20 min. The reaction was quenched by H2O and extracted with EtOAc. The organic solution was dried over anhyd Na2SO4. The product 6 was purified by silica gel chromatography (PE-EtOAc, 4:1). The ee was determined by chiral HPLC (Chiracel AD-H) of the alcohol 6 (5% i-PrOH in hexane
as eluent, 1 mL min-¹).

16

Spectroscopic Data of Products 6 (Table 2) Compound 6 (R² = Me): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.74 (dd, J = 7.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.33 (m, 4 H), 7.21 (m, 4 H), 6.96 (s, 1 H), 5.29 (s, 2 H), 3.30 (m, 2 H), 3.27 (m, 1 H), 2.08 (m, 1 H), 1.95 (m, 1H), 1.44 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.0, 137.1, 129.0, 127.7, 127.6, 126.9, 124.6, 122.0, 121.1, 119.8, 119.1, 110.0, 61.7, 50.1, 40.6, 27.9, 22.1 ppm. HRMS (MALDI-TOF): m/z calcd for C19H22NO [M + H]+: 280.1696; found: 280.1695.
Compound 6 (R² = Et): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.64 (d, J = 7.6, Hz, 1 H), 7.25 (m, 4 H), 7.14 (m, 1 H), 7.06 (m, 3 H) 6.88 (s, 1 H), 5.24 (s, 2 H), 3.56 (m, 2 H), 2.93 (m, 1 H), 1.98 (m, 2 H), 1.74 (m, 2H), 0.83 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H) ppm.
Compound 6 (R² = Pr): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.69 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.33-7.24 (m, 4 H), 7.18 (m, 1 H), 7.17-7.06 (m, 3 H) 6.93 (s, 1 H), 5.29 (s, 2 H), 3.62 (m, 2 H), 3.05 (m, 1 H), 2.03 (m, 2 H), 1.18 (m, 2 H), 1.30 (m, 2 H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.0, 137.1, 128.9, 127.8, 127.7, 126.7, 125.6, 121.8, 119.9, 119.0, 118.9, 110.0, 61.9, 50.0, 39.0, 38.9, 33.6, 21.0, 14.4 ppm.
Compound 6 (R² = Bu): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.30-7.22 (m, 4 H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.09-7.03 (m, 3 H), 6.90 (s, 1 H), 5.27 (s, 2 H), 3.59 (m, 2 H), 3.01 (m, 1 H), 2.00 (m, 2 H), 1.78 (m, 2 H), 1.23 (m, 4 H), 0.83 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.0, 137.1, 128.9, 127.8, 127.7, 126.7, 125.6, 121.8, 119.9, 119.0, 110.0, 61.9, 50.0, 39.0, 36.3, 33.8, 30.2, 23.0, 14.3 ppm.
Compound 6 (R² = Ph): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.52 (m, 1 H), 7.38-7.07 (m, 12 H), 7.03 (m, 2 H), 5.30 (s, 2 H), 4.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.68 (m, 2 H), 2.48 (m, 1 H), 2.29 (m, 1 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 145.1, 138.0, 237.2, 129.0, 128.7, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8, 126.9, 126.4, 125.6, 122.1, 120.0, 119.3, 119.1, 109.9, 61.5, 50.2, 39.4, 39.0 ppm.
Compound 6 (R² = 4-ClC6H4): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.33-7.22 (m, 8 H), 7.15 (m, 3 H), 7.01 (m, 2 H), 5.29 (s, 2 H), 4.40 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.64 (m, 2 H), 2.43 (m, 1 H), 2.22 (m, 1 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 143.6, 137.8, 137.2, 131.9, 129.4, 129.0, 128.7, 127.8, 127.6, 126.8, 125.5, 122.2, 119.8, 119.4, 118.5, 110.0, 61.2, 50.2, 38.8, 38.7 ppm.
Compound 6 (R² = 4-BrC6H4): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.40 (m, 3 H), 7.37-7.18 (m, 6 H), 7.15-7.07 (m, 3 H), 6.99 (m, 2 H), 5.28 (s, 2 H), 4.38 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.62 (m, 2 H), 2.43 (m, 1 H), 2.22 (m, 1 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 144.1, 137.8, 137.2, 131.7, 129.8, 129.0, 127.8, 127.6, 126.8, 125.5, 122.2, 120.0, 119.8, 119.4, 118.4, 110.0, 61.2, 50.2, 38.8, 38.7 ppm.