PDF herunterladen
Synthesis 2009(21): 3611-3616  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1216979
PAPER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

A Short and Convenient Synthesis of Enantiopure cis- and trans-4-Hydroxypipecolic Acid

Ernesto G. Occhiato*a, Dina Scarpia, Antonio Guarnaa, Silvia Tabassob, Annamaria Deagostinob, Cristina Prandi*b
a Dipartimento di Chimica Organica ‘U. Schiff’, Università di Firenze, Via della Lastruccia 13, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
e-Mail: ernesto.occhiato@unifi.it;
b Dipartimento di Chimica Generale e Chimica Organica, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy
e-Mail: cristina.prandi@unito.it;
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 26 June 2009
Publikationsdatum:
28. August 2009 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik
Preview

Abstract

The synthesis of (2S,4R)- and (2R,4R)-4-hydroxypipecolic acid has been realized from commercial ethyl (R)-4-cyano-3-hydroxybutanoate through palladium-catalyzed methoxycarbonylation of a 4-hydroxy-substituted lactam-derived vinyl phosphate followed by the stereocontrolled reduction of the enamine double bond. The stereoselective hydrogenation of the suitably 4-hydroxy-protected enantiomer afforded the cis-(2S,4R)-4-hydroxypipecolic acid product, obtained in 66% overall yield over seven steps. The trans-product (42% overall yield over 8 steps) was instead obtained by hydride conjugate addition to the same α,β-unsaturated ester.

Key word

amino acids - carbonylations - coupling - lactams - palladium

    References

  • 1a Romeo JT. Swain LA. Bleecker AB. Phytochemistry  1983,  22:  1615 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 1b Schenk VW. Schutte HF. Flora  1963,  153:  426 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2a Cocito C. Microbiol. Rev.  1979,  43:  145 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2b Vanderhaeghe H. Janssen G. Compernolle F. Tetrahedron Lett.  1971,  12:  2687 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Clark-Lewis JW. Mortimer PI. Nature  1959,  184:  1234 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Aiello A. Fattorusso E. Giordano A. Menna M. Müller WEG. Perović-Ottstadt S. Schröder HC. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2007,  15:  5877 
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gupta RK. Krishnamurti M. Phytochemistry  1979,  18:  2021 
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Evans SV. Shing TK. Aplin RT. Fellows LE. Fleet GWJ. Phytochemistry  1985,  24:  2593 
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7a Copeland TD. Wondrak EM. Toszer J. Roberts MM. Oroszlan S. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.  1990,  169:  310 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7b Dragovich PS. Parker JE. French J. Inbacuan M. Kalish VJ. Kissinger CR. Knighton DR. Lewis CT. Moomaw EW. Parge HE. Pelletier LAK. Prins TJ. Showalter RE. Tatlock JH. Tucker KD. Villafranca JE. J. Med. Chem.  1996,  39:  1872 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7c Gillard J. Abraham A. Anderson PC. Beaulieu PL. Bogri T. Bousquet Y. Grenier L. Guse Y. Lavellée P. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  2226 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7d Ho B. Zabriskie TM. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  1998,  8:  739 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7e Skiles JW. Giannousis PP. Fales KR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  1996,  6:  963 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8a Ornstein PL. Schoepp DD. Arnold MB. Leander JD. Lodge D. Paschal JW. Elzey T. J. Med. Chem.  1991,  34:  90 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8b Hays SJ. Malone TC. Johnson G. J. Org. Chem.  1991,  56:  4084 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9a Anderson PC, Soucy F, Yoakim C, Lavallée P, and Beaulieu PL. inventors; US  5,545. 
  • 9b Lamarre D. Croteau G. Wardrop E. Bourgon L. Thibeault D. Clouette C. Vaillancourt M. Cohen E. Pargellis C. Yoakim C. Anderson PC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.  1997,  41:  965 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bellier B. Da Nascimiento S. Meudal H. Gincel E. Roques BP. Garbay C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  1998,  8:  1419 
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • For a recent review on the asymmetric synthesis of pipecolic acids and derivatives see:
  • 11a Kadouri-Puchot C. Comesse S. Amino Acids  2005,  29:  101 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11b Cordero FM. Bonollo S. Machetti F. Brandi A. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2006,  3235 
  • 12a Sun C.-S. Lin Y.-S. Hou D.-R. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  73:  6877 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12b Lloyd RC. Lloyd MC. Smith MEB. Holt KE. Swift JP. Keene PA. Taylor SJC. McCague R. Tetrahedron  2004,  60:  717 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12c Marin J. Didierjean C. Aubry A. Casimir J.-R. Briand J.-P. Guichard G. J. Org. Chem.  2004,  69:  130 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12d Celestini P. Danieli B. Lesma G. Sacchetti A. Silvani A. Passarella D. Virdis A. Org. Lett.  2002,  4:  1367 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12e Greshock TJ. Funk RL. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  754 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12f Agami C. Bisaro F. Comesse S. Guesné S. Kadouri-Puchot C. Morgentin R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  2385 
  • 12g Sabat M. Johnson CR. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  1209 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12h Davis FA. Fang T. Chao B. Burns DM. Synthesis  2000,  2106 
  • 12i Brooks CA. Comins DL. Tetrahedron Lett.  2000,  41:  3551 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12j Haddad M. Larchevêque M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1999,  10:  4231 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12k Di Nardo C. Varela O. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  6119 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12l Golubev A. Sewald N. Burger K. Tetrahedron Lett.  1995,  36:  2037 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Occhiato EG. Scarpi D. Guarna A. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  524 
    Crossref
  • 14a Anelli PL. Fedeli F. Gazzotti O. Lattuada L. Lux G. Rebasti F. Bioconjugate Chem.  1999,  10:  137 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14b Chen H. Feng Y. Xu Z. Ye T. Tetrahedron  2005,  61:  11132 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • For a review see:
  • 16a Occhiato EG. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem.  2004,  1:  149 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • Recent progresses in the use of heterocyclic-derived vinyl phosphates:
  • 16b Claveau E. Gillaizeau I. Blu J. Bruel A. Coudert G. J. Org. Chem.  2007,  72:  4832 ; and references therein
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16c Lo Galbo F. Occhiato EG. Guarna A. Faggi C. J. Org. Chem.  2003,  68:  6360 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Cacchi S. Morera E. Ortar G. Tetrahedron Lett.  1985,  26:  1109 
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kaisalo LH. Hase TA. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  7699 
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Crabtree RH. Davis MW. J. Org. Chem.  1986,  51:  2655 ; The reaction was carried out in CH2Cl2 under H2 at 1 atm (no conversion after 24 h) and 50 atm. In the latter case we observed a certain degree of conversion after 24 h (40%) but the facial selectivity was poor (ratio trans/cis ˜3:2)
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 22a Herdeis C. Engel W. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim)  1993,  326:  297 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 22b Herdeis C. Engel W. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim)  1992,  325:  419 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • Compound (2R,4R)-13, possessing trans-stereochemistry, is easily differentiated by ¹H NMR from its cis-isomer especially as the axially oriented proton on C4 is now shielded from δ = 4.15 to 3.70. Moreover in the trans-compound there is an NOE enhancement between H4 and H6axial. Enantiopure cis-isomer (2S,4R)-13 has been already prepared by us (see ref. 13) and, in its racemic form, by Hiemstra and Speckamp. See:
  • 24a Esch PM. de Boer RF. Hiemstra H. Boska IM. Speckamp WN. Tetrahedron  1991,  47:  4063 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24b Esch PM. Boska IM. Hiemstra H. de Boer RF. Speckamp WN. Tetrahedron  1991,  47:  4039 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bartali L. Scarpi D. Guarna A. Prandi C. Occhiato EG. Synlett  2009,  913 
    Thieme Connect
  • 26a Agami C. Couty F. Poursoulis M. Vaissermann J. Tetrahedron  1992,  48:  431 
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26b Golubev AS. Sewald N. Burger K. Tetrahedron  1996,  52:  14757 
    Suche in Google Scholar
15

Purification is not necessary, but a much cleaner lactam is obtained if the protected nitrile is purified by chromatography.

18

Elimination of ROH to give an α,β,γ,δ-unsaturated ester has been sometime observed by us in the presence of acids, even when compound 10 was stored in fridge and traces of acids were present. The same elimination occurs with phosphate 9.

21

Compounds trans-12a, trans-12b, and trans-12c ¹³ are easily differentiated from the corresponding cis-compounds by ¹H NMR analysis. In trans-compounds, the H2 is shifted downfield [trans-12a: δ = 5.02 and 4.86 (two rotamers); trans-12b: δ = 5.06 and 4.91 (two rotamers); trans-12c: δ = 4.98 and 4.83 (two rotamers)] and H6axial is upfield shifted (˜3.00 ppm in trans-12a,b,c) compared to the corresponding protons in the cis-isomers: H2 resonates at cis-12a: δ = 4.80 and 4.64, cis-12b: δ = 4.77 and 4.62, cis-12c: δ = 4.78 and 4.63; H6axial resonates for cis-12a-c at ca. δ = 3.45. The same applies to the corresponding alcohols: in trans-compound 13 H2 resonates at δ = 5.04 and 4.90 (two rotamers) and H6axial at ca. δ = 3.0. In the corresponding cis-isomer,¹³ H2 resonates at δ = 4.85 and 4.70 (two rotamers) and H6axial is shifted downfield to δ = 3.4.

23

Compound 14 was recovered only in traces after chromatography as it probably decomposed in part. Compound 14 has a diagnostic downfield shifted H4 proton to δ = 4.97, in accordance with the value (δ = 4.90-5.00) reported for the analogous N-tosyl and N-Cbz compounds (see ref. 22). 14: ¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.97 (m, 1 H), 4.90-4.70 (br m, 1 H), 4.30-4.00 (br m, 1 H), 3.74 (s, 3 H), 3.35-3.15 (br m, 1 H), 2.55-2.40 (m, 1 H), 2.40-2.37 (m, 1 H), 2.14-2.05 (m, 1 H), 1.98-1.85 (m, 1 H).