Appl Clin Inform 2025; 16(04): 1114-1120
DOI: 10.1055/a-2675-3510
Case Report

Disappearing Text as a Clinical Decision Support Layer: A Case Series

Jared Silberlust
1   MCIT Department of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
,
William Small
1   MCIT Department of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
,
Darhsi Shah
2   Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States
,
Eesha Chakravartty
3   Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Katherine Moawad
4   Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Andrew Moawad
5   Well by Messer, New York, New York, United States
,
Paul Testa
1   MCIT Department of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
,
Jonah Feldman
1   MCIT Department of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
6   NYU Langone, Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Long Island, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Objectives

This case series aims to evaluate several applications of inline disappearing text (DT) clinical decision support (CDS) tools within clinician documentation.

Methods

DT blocks were created to prompt documentation for perioperative anticoagulation planning (scenario 1), predischarge intravenous antibiotic planning (scenario 2), and advanced care planning (ACP; scenario 3). In scenario 1, DT was the only intervention. In scenario 2, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList. In scenario 3, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList and an OurPractice advisory. The number of documented perioperative anticoagulation plans, predischarge intravenous antibiotic plans, and ACP notes was measured pre- and postintervention and compared using chi-square analyses.

Results

In scenario 1, there was no statistically significant change in the percentage of perioperative anticoagulation plans documented at 0 to 24 and 24 to 48 hours before surgery. In scenario 2, documentation of antibiotic contingency planning in patients expected to be discharged within 24 hours increased from 60% (54/90 notes) to 93% (1,850/1,994 notes) X 2 (1, n = 2,084) = 113.1, p < 0.001. In scenario 3, ACP note documentation by discharge in patients with a positive mandatory surprise question increased from 43% (821/1,909 encounters) to 52% (975/1,874 encounters) X 2 (1, n = 3,783) = 30.5, p < 0.001.

Conclusion

Utilizing DT in conjunction with other forms of CDS was associated with an improvement of documentation quality in predischarge IV antibiotics and ACP. A sociotechnical analysis explores how interactions between technology, people, workflow, and culture could contextualize how utilizing DT with other forms of CDS was more effective than DT alone.

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the work and final drafting of the document.




Publication History

Received: 27 May 2025

Accepted: 03 August 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 August 2025

Article published online:
17 September 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany