Lessons Learned from the Usability Assessment of an EHR-Based Tool to Support Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications

Abstract

Background/Objective

Uncontrolled hypertension is common and frequently related to inadequate adherence to prescribed medications, resulting in suboptimal blood pressure control and increased healthcare utilization. Although healthcare providers have the opportunity to improve medication adherence, they may lack the tools to address adherence at the point of care. This study aims to assess the usability of a digital tool designed to improve medication adherence and blood pressure control among patients with hypertension who are not adherent to therapy. By evaluating usability, the study seeks to refine the tool's design, underscore the role of technology in managing hypertension, and provide insights to inform clinical decisions.

Methods

We performed qualitative usability testing of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated intervention with medical assistants (MAs) and primary care providers (PCPs) from a large integrated health system. Usability was assessed with these end-users using the “think aloud” and “near live” approaches. This evaluation was guided by two frameworks: the End-User Computing Satisfaction Index (EUCSI) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

Thematic saturation was reached after usability testing was performed with 10 participants, comprising 5 PCPs and 5 MAs. The study identified several strengths within the content, format, ease of use, timeliness, accuracy, and usefulness of the tool, including the user-friendly content presentation, the usefulness of adherence information, and timely alerts that fit into the workflow. Challenges centered around alert visibility and specificity of information.

Conclusion

Leveraging the two conceptual frameworks (TAM and EUCSI) to test the usability of the medication adherence tool was helpful. The tool's several strengths and opportunities for improvement were found. The resulting suggestions will be used to support the enhancement of the design for optimal implementation in a clinical trial.

Keywords

usability - medication adherence - clinical workflow - EHR - clinical information systems - burnout

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The studies involving humans were approved by the New York University IRB office (IRB ID 21–00133). The confidentiality of participants is fully protected as per the IRB requirements.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 11. November 2024

Angenommen: 05. April 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. August 2025

• References

• 1 Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS. et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71 (19) e127-e248
• 2 Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005; 353 (05) 487-497
• 3 Zyczynski TM, Coyne KS. Hypertension and current issues in compliance and patient outcomes. Curr Hypertens Rep 2000; 2 (06) 510-514
• 4 Uchmanowicz B, Chudiak A, Uchmanowicz I, Rosińczuk J, Froelicher ES. Factors influencing adherence to treatment in older adults with hypertension. Clin Interv Aging 2018; 13: 2425-2441
• 5 Parra DI, Romero Guevara SL, Rojas LZ. Influential factors in adherence to the therapeutic regime in hypertension and diabetes. Invest Educ Enferm 2019; 37 (03) e02
• 6 Grant RW, Singer DE, Meigs JB. Medication adherence before an increase in antihypertensive therapy: a cohort study using pharmacy claims data. Clin Ther 2005; 27 (06) 773-781
• 7 Harmon G, Lefante J, Krousel-Wood M. Overcoming barriers: the role of providers in improving patient adherence to antihypertensive medications. Curr Opin Cardiol 2006; 21 (04) 310-315
• 8 Lewis LM, Ogedegbe C, Ogedegbe G. Enhancing adherence of antihypertensive regimens in hypertensive African-Americans: current and future prospects. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2012; 10 (11) 1375-1380
• 9 Schoenthaler A, Allegrante JP, Chaplin W, Ogedegbe G. The effect of patient-provider communication on medication adherence in hypertensive black patients: does race concordance matter?. Ann Behav Med 2012; 43 (03) 372-382
• 10 Schoenthaler A, Chaplin WF, Allegrante JP. et al. Provider communication effects medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 75 (02) 185-191
• 11 Canfield SM, Koopman RJ. Facilitators and barriers to integrating patient-generated blood pressure data into primary care EHR workflows. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (05) 942-951
• 12 Elkefi S, Blecker S, Bitan Y. Health information technology supporting adherence memory disorder patients: a systematic literature review. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (01) 85-100
• 13 Vidoni ED, Watts AS, Burns JM. et al. Feasibility of a memory clinic-based physical activity prescription program. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 53 (01) 161-170
• 14 Zarit SH, Chiusano C, Harrison AS, Sewell L, Krause C, Liu Y. Rehabilitation of persons with dementia: using technology to improve participation. Aging Ment Health 2021; 25 (03) 543-550
• 15 Koirala T, Burger CD, Chaudhry R. et al. Impact of a disease-focused electronic health record dashboard on clinical staff efficiency in previsit patient review in an ambulatory pulmonary hypertension care clinic. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (05) 928-938
• 16 Chun-Yun Kang G. Technology-based interventions to improve adherence to antihypertensive medications—an evidence-based review. Digit Health 2022; 8: 20 552076221089725
• 17 Erdine S, Arslan E. Monitoring treatment adherence in hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2013; 15 (04) 269-272
• 18 Goldstein MK. Using health information technology to improve hypertension management. Curr Hypertens Rep 2008; 10 (03) 201-207
• 19 Lee Y, Jung M-Y, Shin GW. et al. Safety and usability guidelines of clinical information systems integrating clinical workflow: a systematic review. Healthc Inform Res 2018; 24 (03) 157-169
• 20 Wright MC, Borbolla D, Waller RG. et al. Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Biomed Inform 2019; 100S: 100041
• 21 Prasetyo B, Yulia RWE. Measuring end-user satisfaction of online marketplace using end-user computing satisfaction model (EUCS Model) (Case study: Tokopedia. com). IEEE; 2017: 1-5
• 22 Marangunić N, Granić A. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers Access Inf Soc 2015; 14: 81-95
• 23 Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Manage Inf Syst Q 2000; 24 (04) 665-694
• 24 Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Comm Assoc Inform Syst 2003; 12 (01) 50
• 25 Blecker S, Schoenthaler A, Martinez TR. et al. Leveraging electronic health record technology and team care to address medication adherence: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12 (01) e47930
• 26 Blecker S, Zhao Y, Li X. et al. Approach to estimating adherence to heart failure medications using linked electronic health record and pharmacy data. J Gen Intern Med 2025; 40 (04) 811-817
• 27 Elkefi S, Asan O. The health information technology preferences and perceptions of newly diagnosed patients with cancer. Int J Med Inform 2023; 180: 105275
• 28 Saariluoma P. User psychology of emotional interaction—usability, user experience and technology ethics. In: Rousi R, Leikas J, Saariluoma P. eds. Emotions in Technology Design: From Experience to Ethics. Springer; 2020: 15-26
• 29 Thüring M, Mahlke S. Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction. Int J Psychol 2007; 42 (04) 253-264
• 30 Lo HG, Matheny ME, Seger DL, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. Impact of non-interruptive medication laboratory monitoring alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (01) 66-71
• 31 Banner L, Olney CM. Automated clinical documentation: does it allow nurses more time for patient care?. Comput Inform Nurs 2009; 27 (02) 75-81
• 32 Zayas-Cabán T, Haque SN, Kemper N. Identifying opportunities for workflow automation in health care: lessons learned from other industries. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (03) 686-697
• 33 Stern MJ, Bilgen I, Dillman DA. The state of survey methodology: challenges, dilemmas, and new frontiers in the era of the tailored design. Field Methods 2014; 26 (03) 284-301
• 34 Hussain A, Zhiqiang M, Li M. et al. The mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on nurses' intentions to adopt advanced technology. BMC Nurs 2025; 24 (01) 33