Download PDF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2025; 150(10): 562-569
DOI: 10.1055/a-2500-0927
Dossier

Behandlung des metastasierten Melanoms – Update 2025

Treatment of metastatic melanoma: update 2025
Georg Lodde
,
Lea Jessica Albrecht
,
Dirk Schadendorf
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Fortgeschrittene Melanome weisen eine hohe Metastasierungsrate auf. Durch die modernen Systemtherapien haben sich das progressionsfreie Überleben und das Gesamt-Überleben von Patienten mit metastasiertem Melanom signifikant verbessert – dennoch bleibt die Behandlung eine Herausforderung. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die aktuelle Therapie des metastasierten Melanoms sowie neue Therapieansätze, die derzeit intensiv untersucht werden.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibition and targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibition for BRAF-mutated melanoma have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. Current research focuses on novel treatment strategies for PD-1 resistance, neoadjuvant approaches, and cellular therapies. 10-year follow-up data of randomized clinical trials show that both combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition and PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition alone can achieve long-term survival in metastatic melanoma. Potential surrogate markers of long-term response include a progression-free survival at 3 years after start of treatment and a reduction in tumour burden of at least 80%. The management of PD-1 resistance remains a challenge. Advances in molecular pathology have led to the identification of new therapeutic targets. Several cellular therapies are currently being evaluated in clinical trials as alternatives for melanoma patients refractory to immune checkpoint inhibition or targeted BRAF/MEK inhibition. In BRAF-mutant melanoma, combined BRAF/MEK inhibition is an alternative to immune checkpoint inhibition. Real-world data and clinical trial results on treatment sequencing suggest that immune checkpoint inhibition may improve survival in the first line setting, particularly in the absence of prior adjuvant systemic therapy. Adjuvant treatment leads to improved progression-free survival in melanoma patients while overall survival data are still pending. Neoadjuvant treatment seems to be a promising alternative to conventional adjuvant therapy for specific subgroups of melanoma patients. Participation in clinical trials offers patients the best opportunity to benefit from the latest treatment options.

Kernaussagen

  • Die Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibition und die zielgerichtete Therapie mit BRAF/MEK-Inhibitoren bei BRAF-Mutation haben zu einem signifikant verbesserten progressionsfreien Überleben und Gesamt-Überleben von Patienten mit metastasiertem Melanom geführt.

  • Aktuelle 10-Jahres-Follow-up-Daten zeigen eine langfristige Tumorkontrolle unter einer Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibition. Die Wahl der Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibition sollte individuell mit den Patienten gemeinsam getroffen werden. Mögliche Surrogatmarker für ein exzellentes Langzeit-Ansprechen sind das progressionsfreie Überleben 3 Jahre nach Therapiestart sowie eine Reduktion der Tumorlast von mindestens 80%.

  • Die Resistenz auf eine Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibition ist weiterhin eine therapeutische Herausforderung. Dank eines verbesserten molekularpathologischen Verständnisses gibt es zahlreiche neue therapeutische Zielstrukturen. Vielfältige zelluläre Therapieansätze werden aktuell als Therapie-Alternative für Melanom-Patienten, die auf die bisherigen Systemtherapien mit Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibition bzw. zielgerichteter BRAF/MEK-Inhibition therapierefraktär sind, in klinischen Studien getestet.

  • Aktuelle Daten aus Real-World-Behandlungsregistern, wie auch Studiendaten zur Sequenztherapie, zeigen eine erhöhte Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit unter Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibition gegenüber kombinierter BRAF/MEK-Inhibition in der Erstlinien-Therapie, ohne vorherige adjuvante Systemtherapie bei BRAF-mutierten Melanom-Patienten.

  • Langzeit-Follow-up-Daten zeigen ein verbessertes progressionsfreies Überleben für die adjuvante Therapie. Jedoch stehen die Auswertungen für das Gesamt-Überleben noch aus. Die neoadjuvante Therapie stellt möglicherweise für Subgruppen von Patienten eine vielversprechende Therapie-Alternative zur konventionellen adjuvanten Therapie dar.

Schlüsselwörter

Immuncheckpoint-Inhibition - zielgerichtete BRAF/MEK-Therapie - personalisierte Therapie - neoadjuvante Therapie

Keywords

immuncheckpoint inhibition - targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibition - personalized therapy - neo-adjvuant therapy


Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Robert Koch-Institut, Hrsg. Krebs In Deutschland für 2019/2020 (14. Ausgabe). Gemeinsame Publikation des Zentrums für Krebsregisterdaten und der Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut. 2023
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Schadendorf D, van Akkooi ACJ, Berking C. et al. Melanoma. Lancet 2018; 392: 971-984
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Eisemann N, Schumann L, Baltus H. et al. Longer survival from melanoma in Germany: A registry-based time series study. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2024; 121: 45-51
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Rutkowski P. et al. Final, 10-year outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2025; 392: 11-22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Robert C, Grob JJ, Stroyakovskiy D. et al. Five-year outcomes with dabrafenib plus trametinib in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 626-636
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Lodde G, Eisenburger RT, Schadendorf D. Behandlung des metastasierten Melanoms. TumorDiagn u Ther 2024; 45: 370-375
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 European Medicines Agency (EMA). Opdualag. 2022 Accessed February 18, 2025 at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/opdualag
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tawbi HA, Schadendorf D, Lipson EJ. et al. Relatlimab and nivolumab versus nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 24-34
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Tawbi HA, Hodi FS, Lipson EJ. et al. Three-year overall survival with nivolumab plus relatlimab in advanced melanoma from RELATIVITY-047. J Clin Oncol 2024; JCO2401124
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Long GV, Carlino MS, McNeil C. et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: 10-year follow-up of the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study. Ann Oncol 2024; 35: 1191-1199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Váraljai R, Zimmer L, Al-Matary Y. et al. Interleukin 17 signaling supports clinical benefit of dual CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint inhibition in melanoma. Nat Cancer 2023; 4: 1292-1308
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Robert C, Long GV, Larkin J. et al. Long-term outcomes among patients who respond within the first year to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy: A pooled analysis in 935 patients. Eur J Cancer 2025; 214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Hassel JC, Forschner A, Erdmann M. et al. 1107P – Characteristics and quality of life of nine-year survivors from 312 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. Ann Oncol 2024; 35: S733-S734
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Haanen J, Obeid M, Spain L. et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: 1217-1238
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R. et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 23-34
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Arance AM, O’Day SJ, de la Cruz-Merino L. et al. Lenvatinib (len) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with advanced melanoma that progressed on anti–PD-(L)1 therapy: Over 4 years of follow-up from the phase 2 LEAP-004 study. JCO 2024; 42: 9559
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Li Y, Wu X, Sheng C. et al. IGSF8 is an innate immune checkpoint and cancer immunotherapy target. Cell 2024; 187: 2703-2716.e23
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ascierto PA, Rodon J, De Vos FY. et al. 1081MO – Phase I study of WNT974 in combination with spartalizumab in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Oncol 2024; 35: S716-S717
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wong MKK, Sacco JJ, Robert C. et al. Efficacy and safety of RP1 combined with nivolumab in patients with anti-PD-1-failed melanoma from the IGNYTE clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42 (Suppl. 16) 9517
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Sarnaik AA, Hamid O, Khushalani NI. et al. Lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39: 2656-2666
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Chesney JA, Ribas A, Long GV. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global phase III trial of talimogene laherparepvec combined with pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 528-540
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rohaan MW, Borch TH, van den Berg JH. et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy or ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 2113-2125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Wermke CM, Chesney JA, Whitman H. et al. Domingo-Musibay, Long-term efficacy and patterns of response of lifileucel tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy in patients with advanced melanoma: A 4-year analysis of the C-144-01 study. (Abstract 119O, presented at ESMO 2023). Annals of Oncology 2023; 20 (Suppl. 01) 100589
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Albarrán Fernández V, Ballestín Martínez P, Stoltenborg Granhøj J. et al. Biomarkers for response to TIL therapy: a comprehensive review. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12: e008640
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Gargett T, Truong NTH, Gardam B. et al. Safety and biological outcomes following a phase 1 trial of GD2-specific CAR-T cells in patients with GD2-positive metastatic melanoma and other solid cancers. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12: e008659
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Immatics. Immatics announces updated phase 1b clinical data on ACTengine IMA203 TCR-T targeting PRAME in melanoma patients and provides update on upcoming SUPRAME phase 3 trial. 2024 Accessed February 19, 2025 at: https://investors.immatics.com/news-releases/news-release-details/immatics-announces-updated-phase-1b-clinical-data-actenginer/
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Borgers JSW, Lenkala D, Kohler V. et al. Personalized, autologous neoantigen-specific T cell therapy in metastatic melanoma: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med 2025;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 European Medicines Agency. Kimmtrak (tebentafusp). An overview of Kimmtrak and why it is authorised in the EU. 2022 Accessed February 19, 2025 at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/overview/kimmtrak-epar-medicine-overview_en.pdf
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Hassel JC, Piperno-Neumann S, Rutkowski P. et al. Three-year overall survival with tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma. N Engl J Med 2023; 389: 2256-2266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hamid O, Williams A, Lopez JS. et al. Phase 1 safety and efficacy of IMC-F106C, a PRAME× CD3 ImmTAC bispecific, in post-checkpoint cutaneous melanoma (CM). J Clin Oncol 2024; 42 (Suppl. 16) 9507
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 BioNTech Press Release. BioNTech announces positive topline phase 2 results for mRNA immunotherapy candidate BNT111 in patients with advanced melanoma. 2024 Accessed February 19, 2025 at: https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-details/biontech-announces-positive-topline-phase-2-results-mrna/
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Heinzerling L, Eigentler TK, Fluck M. et al. Tolerability of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations: adverse event evaluation and management. ESMO Open 2019; 4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Flaherty KT. et al. COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2024; 204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Weichenthal M, Svane IM, Kandolf Sekulovic L. et al. EMRseq: Registry-based outcome analysis on 1,000 patients with BRAF V600–mutated metastatic melanoma in Europe treated with either immune checkpoint or BRAF-/MEK inhibition. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (Suppl. 16) 9540
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Atkins MB, Lee SJ, Chmielowski B. et al. Combination dabrafenib and trametinib versus combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma: The DREAMseq Trial – ECOG-ACRIN EA6134. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 186-197
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Mandalà M, Ferrucci PF, Guidoboni M. et al. 1083MO – Brain metastases and survival evaluation in the SECOMBIT trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34 (Suppl. 02) S653
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Schadendorf D, Gogas H, Kandolf Sekulovic L. et al. LBA45 – Early switch from targeted to immunotherapy in advanced BRAFV600-positive melanoma: Long-term OS and final PFS results of the randomized phase II ImmunoCobiVem trial. Ann Oncol 2024; 35 (Suppl. 02) S1235-S1236
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Garbe C, Keim U, Amaral T. et al. Prognosis of patients with primary melanoma stage I and II according to American Joint Committee on Cancer Version 8 validated in two independent cohorts: implications for adjuvant treatment. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40: 3741-3749
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M. et al. Prognostic and predictive value of AJCC-8 staging in the phase III EORTC1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial of pembrolizumab vs placebo in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2019; 116: 148-157
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Long GV, Del Vecchio M, Hoeller C. et al. 1077MO – Adjuvant nivolumab v placebo in stage IIB/C melanoma: 3-year results from CheckMate 76K. Ann Oncol 2024; 35 (Suppl. 02) S713-S714
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Luke JJ, Ascierto PA, Khattak MA. et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma: Final analysis of distant metastasis-free survival in the phase III KEYNOTE-716 Study. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42: 1619-1624
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Long GV, Hauschild A, Santinami M. et al. Final results for adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 2024; 391: 1709-1720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Eggermont AMM, Kicinski M, Blank CU. et al. Seven-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in stage III melanoma in the EORTC1325 / KEYNOTE-054 trial. Eur J Cancer 2024; 211
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Ascierto P, Del Vecchio M, Merelli B. et al. 1089P – Adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) vs ipilimumab (IPI) in resected stage III/IV melanoma: 7-y results from CheckMate 238. Ann Oncol 2023; 34 (Suppl. 02) S656
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Helgadottir H, Ny L, Ullenhag GJ. et al. 1079MO – Survival before and after the introduction of adjuvant treatment in stage III melanoma: A nationwide registry-based study. Ann Oncol 2024; 35 (Suppl. 02) S715-S716
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Patel SP, Othus M, Chen Y. et al. Neoadjuvant–adjuvant or adjuvant-only pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 813-823
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Blank CU, Lucas MW, Scolyer RA. et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab in resectable stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 2024; 391: 1696-1708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar