Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Azlactones by Bifunctional Thioureas with α‑Trifluoromethyl or Methyl Groups

The asymmetric ring opening of azlactones via dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) is investigated by contrasting thioureas incorporating 1-arylethyl substituents against their more acidic trifluoromethylated analogs. All the catalysts under study outperform Takemoto’s thiourea because of the inclusion of an additional chiral center. However, the difference in yield and selectivity between the fluorinated and non-fluorinated catalysts is minimal. We explain this observation by analysis of calculated transition states. Our findings show that the hydrogen bond (HB) between the NH linked to the 1-arylethyl and the negatively charged oxygen in the benzyloxy ion is the longest in the HB network, whereas the HB between the ammonium group and the same oxygen atom is the shortest. Thus, the substituents and the HB donor ability of this chiral fragment attached to the thiourea are not important in the reaction.

Key words

amino acids - asymmetric catalysis - stereoselectivity - kinetic resolution - asymmetric synthesis

Full Text

References

References and Notes
1 Current address: Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Unidad Mérida, UNAM, Carretera Mérida-Tetiz, Km 4, Ucú, C.P. 97357, Yucatán, México.

2a Xie M.-S, Huang B, Li N, Tian Y, Wu X.-X, Deng Y, Qu G.-R, Guo H.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 19226
2b Mandai H, Hongo K, Fujiwara T, Fujii K, Mitsudo K, Suga S. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 4811

3a Kikuchi J, Terada M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 8458
3b Zhang S.-Y, Ruan G.-Y, Geng Z.-C, Li N.-K, Lv M, Wang Y, Wang X.-W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 5698
3c Zhou J, Wang M.-L, Gao X, Jiang G.-F, Zhou Y.-G. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53: 3531

4 Uraguchi D, Yoshioka K, Ooi T. Nat. Commun. 2017; 8: 14793
5 de Mello AC, Momo PB, Burtoloso AC. B, Amarante GW. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 11399
6 Pantin M, Caillé J, Boeda F, Fontaine L, Pearson-Long MS. M, Bertus P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 7359

7a Mavridis E, Bermperoglou E, Pontiki E, Hadjipavlou-Litina D. Molecules 2020; 25: 3173
7b de Azeredo CM. O, Ávila EP, Pinheiro DL. J, Amarante GW, Soares MJ. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017; 364
7c Robinson KR, Mills JJ, Pierce JG. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2019; 10: 374
7d Frohock BH, Gilbertie JM, Daiker JC, Schnabel LV, Pierce JG. ChemBioChem 2020; 21: 933
7e Mills JJ, Robinson KR, Zehnder TE, Pierce JG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 8682
7f Das Mahapatra A, Queen A, Yousuf M, Khan P, Hussain A, Rehman MT, Alajmi MF, Datta B, Hassan MI. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022; 40: 3144
7g Haneen DS. A, Abou-Elmagd WS. I, Youssef AS. A. Synth. Commun. 2021; 51: 215
7h Wieczorek-Błauż A, Błauż A, Rychlik B, Plażuk D. J. Organomet. Chem. 2021; 953: 122026
7i Cativiela C, Diaz-de-Villegas MD. 5(2H)-Oxazolones and 5(4H)-Oxazolones . In Oxazoles: Synthesis, Reactions, and Spectroscopy . John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken: 2004: 129-330

8a Ozturk Urut G, Alp S, Topkaya D. Dyes Pigm. 2017; 145: 103
8b Kratochvil MJ, Carter MC. D, Lynn DM. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017; 9: 10243
8c Neri G, Scala A, Fazio E, Mineo PG, Rescifina A, Piperno A, Grassi G. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 6961
8d Rodrigues CA. B, Mariz IF. A, Maçôas EM. S, Afonso CA. M, Martinho JM. G. Dyes Pigm. 2013; 99: 642

9 de Castro PP, Batiasta GM. F, dos Santos HF, Amarante GW. ACS Omega 2018; 3: 3507
10 Brown SA, Parker M.-C, Turner NJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000; 11: 1687
11 Metrano AJ, Miller SJ. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 1542

12a Lu G, Birman VB. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 356
12b Zhang Y.-C, Yang Q, Yang X, Zhu Q.-N, Shi F. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016; 5: 914

13a Tallon S, Manoni F, Connon SJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 813
13b Li P, Hu X, Dong X.-Q, Zhang X. Molecules 2016; 21: 1327
13c Rodríguez-Docampo Z, Quigley C, Tallon S, Connon SJ. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 2407
13d Berkessel A, Cleemann F, Mukherjee S, Müller TN, Lex J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 807
13e Berkessel A, Mukherjee S, Cleemann F, Muller TN, Lex J. Chem. Commun. 2005; 1898
13f Berkessel A, Mukherjee S, Müller TN, Cleemann F, Roland K, Brandenburg M, Neudörfl J.-M, Lex J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006; 4: 4319

14 Li X, Deng H, Zhang B, Li J, Zhang L, Luo S, Chen J.-P. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 450
15 Okino T, Hoashi Y, Takemoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 12672
16 Lippert KM, Hof K, Gerbig D, Ley D, Hausmann H, Guenther S, Schreiner PR. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 5919

17a Jiménez EI, Vallejo Narváez WE, Román-Chavarría CA, Vazquez-Chavez J, Rocha-Rinza T, Hernández-Rodríguez M. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 7419
17b Trejo-Huizar KE, Ortiz-Rico R, de los Angelos Peña-González M, Hernández-Rodríguez M. New J. Chem. 2013; 37: 2610

18 Gottwald K, Seebach D. Tetrahedron 1999; 55: 723
19 DKR of Azlactone 3f (Table [1], entry 11); Representative Procedure In a 4 mL vial, the azlactone 2a (50.2 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.) and catalyst A2_F (4 mg, 0.01 mmol, 0.05 equiv.) were dissolved in toluene (0.66 mL). Benzyl alcohol (0.03 mL, 0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) was added and the mixture stirred for 24 h. The solvent was removed and the crude product was adsorbed on Celite and subjected to purification by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 8:2) to afford 3f (66.1 mg, 92%) as a white solid. Mp 95–97 °C; [α]_D ²⁵ –29.3 (78% ee) (c 1.05, CHCl₃). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.74 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.54–7.20 (m, 11 H), 7.06 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.36–5.04 (m, 3 H), 3.40–3.11 (m, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 171.6, 166.9, 135.8, 135.1, 134.0, 131.8, 129.5, 128.7, 128.7, 128.6, 127.2, 127.1, 67.4, 53.6, 37.9. DART (positive): m/z (%) = 360 (100) [M + H]⁺. HPLC: Chiralpak IA, hexane/ethanol = 90:10, 0.8 mL/min, λ = 220 nm, t _R = 20.5 min (R) and t _R = 22.3 min (S).
20 Fuentes de Arriba ÁL, Rubio OH, Simón L, Alcázar V, Monleón LM, Sanz F, Morán JR. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2017; 28: 819
21 Li X, Zhang B, Xi Z.-G, Luo S, Cheng J.-P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010; 352: 416
22 Hamza A, Schubert G, Soós T, Pápai I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 13151

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information