Antikoagulation bei Vorhofflimmern

Abstract

Anticoagulation with oral antagonists without vitamin K (NOACs) is the preferred therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) should only be prescribed if there are contraindications to NOAC (e. g. mechanical heart valves, rheumatic mitral stenosis). The guideline recommendations are based on dedicated NOAC development programs with large randomized clinical phase III studies. Data from observational studies on the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared to VKA are in general complementary to data stemming from the phase III studies. Due to their pharmacokinetic and dynamic properties, NOACs are much easier to handle than VKA. Amongst other advantages, this implies that in case of short interruptions in anticoagulation therapy (e. g. for surgical procedures), bridging therapy with heparin is no longer required. This will reduce bleeding complications dramatically.

Das Repertoire der antikoagulativen Therapie wurde in den letzten Jahren um die oralen Nicht-Vitamin-K-Antagonisten erweitert. Diese gelten als sicher und ersparen dem Patienten das regelmäßige Monitoring. Doch sind sie auch effektiv in der Schlaganfallprophylaxe? Und wie sind die aktuellen Empfehlungen zum „Bridging“? Dieser Beitrag stützt sich auf umfassende Studien, die die herkömmlichen Blutverdünner mit den neuen vergleichen.

Schlüsselwörter

Vorhofflimmern - Schlaganfallprävention - Antikoagulation - NOACs - Blutungsrisiko

Key words

atrial fibrillation - stroke prevention - anticoagulation - non vitamin K oral antagonists - risk of bleeding

Publication History

Article published online:
15 July 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K. et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation 2014; 129: 837-847
• 2 Wolf PA, Mitchell JB, Baker CS. et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on mortality, stroke, and medical costs. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 229-234
• 3 Henninger N, Goddeau Jr RP, Karmarkar A. et al. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a worse 90-day outcome than other cardioembolic stroke subtypes. Stroke 2016; 47: 1486-1492
• 4 Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D. et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 2893-2962
• 5 Hart RG. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 857
• 6 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151
• 7 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J. et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-891
• 8 Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ. et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992
• 9 Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E. et al. Once-daily edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2093-2104
• 10 Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383: 955-962
• 11 Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR. et al Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: pii e003725 . doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725
• 12 Graham DJ, Baro E, Zhang R. et al. Comparative stroke, bleeding, and mortality risks in older Medicare patients treated with oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 2019; 132: 596-604
• 13 Hohnloser SH, Basic E, Näbauer M. Comparative risk of major bleeding with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and phenprocoumon in patients with atrial fibrillation: a post-marketing surveillance study. Clin Res Cardiol 2017; 106: 618-662
• 14 Hohnloser SH, Basic E, Näbauer M. Uptake in antithrombotic treatment and its association with stroke incidence in atrial fibrillation: insights from a large German claims database. Clin Res Cardiol 2019; 108: 1042-1052
• 15 Cowan JC, Wu J, Hall M. et al. A 10 year study of hospitalized atrial fibrillation-related stroke in England and its association with uptake of oral anticoagulation. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2975-2983
• 16 Forslund T, Komen JJ, Andersen M. et al. Improved stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation after the introduction of non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Stroke 2018; 49: 2122-2128
• 17 Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS. et al. The 2018 European heart rhythm association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 1330-1393
• 18 Doukatis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Kaatz S. et al. Perioperative bridging anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 823-833
• 19 Birnie DH, Healey JS, Wells GA. et al. Pacemaker or defibrillator surgery without interruption of anticoagulation. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2084-2093
• 20 Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Duncan J. et al. Perioperative management of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving a direct oral anticoagulant. JAMA 2019;
• 21 Pollack Jr CV, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J. et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 511-520
• 22 Connolly J, Crowther M, Eikelboom J. et al. Full study report of andexanet alpha for bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 3326-3335