Zusammenfassung
Das augenärztliche Gutachten hat oft juristische und finanzielle Folgen für die Betroffenen. Es ist daher wichtig, dass es formal richtig und qualitativ hochwertig erstellt wird. Leider werden die erforderlichen Untersuchungen häufig nicht optimal durchgeführt, Befunde nicht untermauert, Formalien nicht eingehalten. In diesem Beitrag geht es um die Grundlagen, die bei jeder Gutachtenerstellung beachtet werden müssen. Weitere Beiträge folgen.
Abstract
The position of the ophthalmologist as an unbiased and impartial expert in the field of tension between the client and the patient is a responsible task that should not be underestimated. Since the ophthalmological expert assessment often has far-reaching legal and financial consequences, it is very important that it is both formally correct and of high quality. Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly common to find that the examinations required for the preparation of an expert opinion are not carried out optimally, that findings are not substantiated or that formalities are not adhered to correctly. This article will therefore explain how to draw up a correct ophthalmological expert assessment that is legally unassailable. This article deals, among other things, with the most important principles that must be considered in every expert assessment, regardless of the type of assessment. It deliberately does not deal with details that have to be considered in the different
types of reports. This is then done in planned follow-up articles.
Schlüsselwörter
Gutachten - DIN 58220 - Landolt-Ringe - Goldmann-Gesichtsfeld - Untersuchungsstrategien für ärztliche Gutachten
Key words
examination strategies - expert assessment - DIN 58220 - Landolt rings - Landolt C Goldmann kinetic perimetry
