In search of dialogue and discourse in applied clinical informatics

G. R. Kim; C. U. Lehmann

doi:10.4338/ACI09-10-0002

Applied Clinical Informatics, Table of Contents

Appl Clin Inform 2009; 00(01): 1-7
DOI: 10.4338/ACI09-10-0002

Editorial

Schattauer GmbH

In search of dialogue and discourse in applied clinical informatics

G. R. Kim

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

,

C. U. Lehmann

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

We present a model of applied clinical informatics in the context of medical informatics in general, across the domain of health sciences and the continuum of information technology development and its adoption into workflow. The distinct challenges of applied clinical informatics present an opportunity to improve efforts through collaboration of the growing number of physicians, health institutional leaders and other health workers in successfully implementing working systems. This journal will be a forum for discussion regarding approaches to design, implement, deploy and evaluate systems and importantly, how to present experiences in a way to maximize sharing of those experiences.

Keywords

Medical Informatics Applications - Socio-technical aspect of information technology - Communications - Evaluation - Theoretical Models

Full Text

References

References
1 Friedman CP. Where’s the science in medical informatics?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; Jan-Feb; 2 (01) 65-67.
2 McAfee A. Harvard Business Review 2007; 85 (02) 150-150 1/3p; (AN 23691186)
3 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST. et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (06) 1506-1512. Erratum in: Pediatrics. 2006; 117(2): 594.
4 Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A. et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; 293 (10) 1197-1203.
5 Reason J. Understanding adverse events: human factors. Qual Health Care 1995; 4 (02) 80-89.
6 Sexton JB, Paine LA, Manfuso J. et al. A check-up for safety culture in ,,my patient care area“. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2007; 33 (11) 699-703 645.
7 Coiera E. Putting the technical back into socio-technical systems research?. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (01) S98-S103.
8 Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Georgiou A. et al. Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (06) 746-755.
9 Talmon J, Ammenwerth E, Brender J. et al. STARE-HI--Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (01) 1-9.
10 Friedman CP. ,,Smallball“ evaluation: a prescription for studying community-based information interventions?. J Med Libr Assoc 2005; 93 (04) S43-S48.