The Effectiveness of Hands-on Health Informatics Skills Exercises in the Multidisciplinary Smart Home Healthcare and Health Informatics Training Laboratories

Abstract

Objective This article aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of newly established innovative smart home healthcare and health informatics laboratories, and a novel laboratory course that focuses on experiential health informatics training, and determine students' self-confidence to operate wireless home health monitoring devices before and after the hands-on laboratory course.

Materials and Methods Two web-based pretraining and posttraining questionnaires were sent to 64 students who received hands-on training with wireless remote patient monitoring devices in smart home healthcare and health informatics laboratories.

Results All 64 students completed the pretraining survey (100% response rate), and 49 students completed the posttraining survey (76% response rate). The quantitative data analysis showed that 95% of students had an interest in taking more hands-on laboratory courses. Sixty-seven percent of students had no prior experience with medical image, physiological data acquisition, storage, and transmission protocols. After the hands-on training session, 75.51% of students expressed improved confidence about training patients to measure blood pressure monitor using wireless devices. Ninety percent of students preferred to use a similar experiential approach in their future learning experience. Additionally, the qualitative data analysis demonstrated that students were expecting to have more courses with hands-on exercises and integration of technology-enabled delivery and patient monitoring concepts into the curriculum.

Conclusion This study demonstrated that the multidisciplinary smart home healthcare and health informatics training laboratories and the hands-on exercises improved students' technology adoption rates and their self-confidence in using wireless patient monitoring devices.

Keywords

hands-on health informatics training - smart home-based health platform - remote patient monitoring - experiential health informatics

• References

• 1 Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH. Medical informatics. An emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. JAMA 1990; 263 (08) 1114-1120
• 2 Cano I, Lluch-Ariet M, Gomez-Cabrero D. , et al; Synergy-COPD Consortium. Biomedical research in a Digital Health Framework. J Transl Med 2014; 12 (Suppl. 02) S10
• 3 World Population Prospects. The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2017 . Available at: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_KeyFindings.pdf
• 4 Kim KI, Gollamudi SS, Steinhubl S. Digital technology to enable aging in place. Exp Gerontol 2017; 88: 25-31
• 5 Chan M, Estève D, Escriba C, Campo E. A review of smart homes- present state and future challenges. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008; 91 (01) 55-81
• 6 Forkan ARM, Khalil I, Tari Z, Foufou S, Bouras A. A context-aware approach for long-term behavioral change detection and abnormality prediction in ambient assisted living. Pattern Recognit 2015; 48 (03) 628-641
• 7 Fischinger D, Einramhof P, Papoutsakis K. , et al. Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and lessons learned. Robot Auton Syst 2016; 75: 60-78
• 8 Minerva R, Biru A, Rotondi D. Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Internet Initiative; 2015. Available at: http://iot.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/IEEE_IoT_Towards_Definition_Internet_of_Things_Revision1_27MAY15.pdf . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 9 Vegesna A, Tran M, Angelaccio M, Arcona S. Remote patient monitoring via non-invasive digital technologies: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2017; 23 (01) 3-17
• 10 Friedman CP, Altman RB, Kohane IS. , et al; American College of Medical Informatics. Training the next generation of informaticians: the impact of “BISTI” and bioinformatics–a report from the American College of Medical Informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (03) 167-172
• 11 Hersh W, Junium K, Mailhot M, Tidmarsh P. Implementation and evaluation of a distance learning introductory course in medical informatics. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 84 (Pt 2): 1023-1027
• 12 Hasman A, Mantas J. IMIA accreditation of health informatics programs. Healthc Inform Res 2013; 19 (03) 154-161
• 13 The TIGER Virtual Demonstration Collaborative Team. A TIGER Collaborative Report. 2009. Available at: http://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/public/FileDownloads/tiger-report-virtual-learning-center.pdf . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 14 Milano CE, Hardman JA, Plesiu A, Rdesinski RE, Biagioli FE. Simulated electronic health record (Sim-EHR) curriculum: teaching EHR skills and use of the EHR for disease management and prevention. Acad Med 2014; 89 (03) 399-403
• 15 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Health IT Workforce Development Program. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/fact-sheets/get-the-facts-about-health-it-workforce-development-program.pdf . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 16 Mohan V, Abbott P, Acteson S. , et al. Design and evaluation of the ONC health information technology curriculum. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (03) 509-516
• 17 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Implementation of ONC's Workforce Development Program. 2013. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/communitycollegeevaluationsitevisitreport.pdf . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 18 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Workforce Training Program Awardees. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/workforce-development-programs . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 19 NORC at the University of Chicago. Final Report: Executive Summary. Evaluation of the Information Technology Professionals in Health Care (“Workforce”) Program - Summative Report. 2014. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/workforceevaluationsummativerpt_execsummary.pdf . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 20 Sikka N, Choudhri T, Jarrin R. The George Washington University Emergency Medicine Telemedicine and Digital Health Fellowship. Virtual Mentor 2014; 16 (12) 976-980
• 21 Triola MM, Friedman E, Cimino C, Geyer EM, Wiederhorn J, Mainiero C. Health information technology and the medical school curriculum. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16 (12, Suppl HIT): SP54-SP56
• 22 Gardner RM, Overhage JM, Steen EB. , et al; AMIA Board of Directors. Core content for the subspecialty of clinical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (02) 153-157
• 23 Safran C, Shabot MM, Munger BS. , et al; AMIA Board of Directors. Program requirements for fellowship education in the subspecialty of clinical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (02) 158-166
• 24 Moore RA, Berner ES. Comparing health/medical informatics graduate program curricula against two sets of professional criteria. J Healthc Inf Manag 2004; 18 (03) 44-50
• 25 Brinton TJ, Kurihara CQ, Camarillo DB. , et al. Outcomes from a postgraduate biomedical technology innovation training program: the first 12 years of Stanford Biodesign. Ann Biomed Eng 2013; 41 (09) 1803-1810
• 26 Zuckerman B, Margolis PA, Mate KS. Health services innovation: the time is now. JAMA 2013; 309 (11) 1113-1114
• 27 Loftus PD, Elder CT, D'Ambrosio T, Langell JT. Addressing challenges of training a new generation of clinician-innovators through an interdisciplinary medical technology design program: bench-to-bedside. Clin Transl Med 2015;4(1). Available at: http://www.clintransmed.com/content/4/1/15 . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 28 Loftus PD, Elder CT, Sorensen MW. , et al. Creating a Benchmark Medical Technology Entrepreneurship Competition. The University of Utah Bench-to-Bedside Medical Device Design Competition. NCIIA Open Conference Report; 2014. Available at: http://venturewell.org/open2014/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/LANGELL.pdf . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 29 The University of Utah. The University of Utah Health Sciences Center for Medical Innovation: Bench-to-Bedside Competition Report 2012. 2012. Available at: https://library.med.utah.edu/e-channel/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/EndofYearReport2012.pdf . Accessed July 15, 2017
• 30 Gelijns AC, Thier SO. Medical innovation and institutional interdependence: rethinking university-industry connections. JAMA 2002; 287 (01) 72-77
• 31 Ritko AL, Odlum M. Gap analysis of biomedical informatics graduate education competencies. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2013; 2013: 1214-1223
• 32 Mantas J, Ammenwerth E, Demiris G. , et al. Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on education in biomedical and health informatics-first revision. Acta Inform Med 2010; 18 (01) 4
• 33 American Telemedicine Association. Practice Guidelines & Resources. Available at: http://hub.americantelemed.org/resources/telemedicine-practice-guidelines
• 34 Himmelfarb CRD, Commodore-Mensah Y, Hill MN. Expanding the role of nurses to improve hypertension care and control globally. Ann Glob Health 2016; 82 (02) 243-253
• 35 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 (02) 77-101
• 36 United Nations. World Population Ageing. 2015. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf
• 37 Demiris G, Rantz M, Aud M. , et al. Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: a pilot study. Med Inform Internet Med 2004; 29 (02) 87-94
• 38 Ammenwerth E, Knaup P, Winter A. , et al. On teaching international courses on health information systems. Lessons learned during 16 years of Frank - van Swieten Lectures on strategic information management in health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2017; 56 (Open): e39-e48
• 39 Sweeney G. The challenge for basic science education in problem-based medical curricula. Clin Invest Med 1999; 22 (01) 15-22
• 40 Demiris G, Zierler B. Integrating problem-based learning in a nursing informatics curriculum. Nurse Educ Today 2010; 30 (02) 175-179
• 41 Zhao B, Potter DD. Comparison of lecture-based learning vs discussion-based learning in undergraduate medical students. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (02) 250-257
• 42 Choi E, Lindquist R, Song Y. Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 34 (01) 52-56
• 43 Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2014: 381