RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0162
Evaluation: A Qualitative Pilot Study of Novel Information Technology Infrastructure to Communicate Genetic Variant Updates
The authors would like to thank the participants across the multiple clinic and laboratory sites who gave freely of their time to assist in this evaluation. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Challenge Grants and Partnerships as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The project described was supported by Award Number RC1LMO10526 from the National Library of Medicine. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Library of Medicine or the National Institutes of Health.Publikationsverlauf
received:
24. November 2015
accepted:
21. März 2016
Publikationsdatum:
16. Dezember 2017 (online)
Summary
Background
Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine developed GeneInsight Clinic (GIC), a tool designed to communicate updated variant information from laboratory geneticists to treating clinicians through automated alerts, categorized by level of variant interpretation change.
Objectives
The study aimed to evaluate feedback from the initial users of the GIC, including the advantages and challenges to receiving this variant information and using this technology at the point of care.
Methods
Healthcare professionals from two clinics that ordered genetic testing for cardiomyopathy and related disorders were invited to participate in one-hour semi-structured interviews and/ or a one-hour focus group. Using a Grounded Theory approach, transcript concepts were coded and organized into themes.
Results
Two genetic counselors and two physicians from two treatment clinics participated in individual interviews. Focus group participants included one genetic counselor and four physicians.
Analysis resulted in 8 major themes related to structuring and communicating variant knowledge, GIC’s impact on the clinic, and suggestions for improvements. The interview analysis identified longitudinal patient care, family data, and growth in genetic testing content as potential challenges to optimization of the GIC infrastructure.
Discussion
Participants agreed that GIC implementation increased efficiency and effectiveness of the clinic through increased access to genetic variant information at the point of care.
Conclusion
Development of information technology (IT) infrastructure to aid in the organization and management of genetic variant knowledge will be critical as the genetic field moves towards whole exome and whole genome sequencing. Findings from this study could be applied to future development of IT support for genetic variant knowledge management that would serve to improve clinicians’ ability to manage and care for patients.
Citation: Klinkenberg-Ramirez S, Neri PM, Volk LA, Samaha SJ, Newmark LP, Pollard S, Varugheese M, Baxter S, Aronson SJ, Rehm HL, Bates DW. Evaluation: A qualitative pilot study of novel information technology infrastructure to communicate genetic variant updates.
-
References
- 1 Aronson SJ, Clark EH, Varugheese M, Baxter S, Babb LJ, Rehm HL. Communicating new knowledge on previously reported genetic variants. Genet Med 2012; 14: 713-719 doi:10.1038/gim.2012.19.
- 2 Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Bustamante CD, Evans JP, Landrum MJ, Ledbetter DH, Maglott DR, Martin CL, Nussbaum RL, Plon SE, Ramos EM, Sherry ST, Watson MS. ClinGen — The Clinical Genome Resource. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (23) 2235-2242.
- 3 Richards CS, Bale S, Bellissimo DB, Das S, Grody WW, Hegde MR, Lyon E, Ward BE. ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 2008; 10 (04) 294-300.
- 4 Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, Berg JS, Brown KK, Deignan JL, Friez MJ, Funke BH, Hegde MR, Lyon E. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med 2013; 15 (09) 733-747.
- 5 Hoffman MA, Williams MS. Electronic medical records and personalized medicine. Hum Genet 2011; 130 (01) 33-39.
- 6 Del Fiol G, Williams MS, Maram N, Rocha RA, Wood GM, Mitchell JA. Integrating genetic information resources with an EHR. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006; 904.
- 7 Aronson SJ, Clark EH, Babb LJ, Baxter S, Farwell LM, Funke BH, Hernandez AL, Joshi VA, Lyon E, Parthum AR, Russel FJ, Varugheese M, Venman TC, Rehm HL. The GeneInsight Suite: a platform to support laboratory and provider use of DNA-based genetic testing. Human mutation 2011; 32 (05) 532-536.
- 8 Harrison S, Dolinsky J, Vincent L, Johnson AK, Chao E, Azzariti D, Das S, Bale S, Rehm H. Clinical Laboratories Implement the ACMG/AMP Guidelines to Resolve Differences in Variant Interpretations Submitted to ClinVar. in ACMG Annual Clinical Genetics Meeting. 2016. Tampa, FL.:
- 9 Bell GC, Crews KR, Wilkinson MR, Haidar CE, Hicks JK, Baker DK, Kornegay NM, Yang W, Cross SJ, Howard SC, Freimuth RR, Evans WE, Broeckel U, Relling MV, Hoffman JM. Development and use of active clinical decision support for preemptive pharmacogenomics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (e1): e93-e99.
- 10 Kho AN, Rasmussen LV, Connolly JJ, Peissig PL, Starren J, Hakonarson H, Hayes MG. Practical challenges in integrating genomic data into the electronic health record. Genet Med 2013; 15 (10) 772-778.
- 11 Neri PM, Pollard SE, Volk LA, Newmark LP, Varugheese M, Baxter S, Aronson SJ, Rehm HL, Bates DW. Usability of a novel clinician interface for genetic results. J Biomed Inform 2012; 45 (05) 950-957.
- 12 Wilcox AR, Neri PM, Volk LA, Newmark LP, Clark EH, Babb LJ, Varugheese M, Aronson SJ, Rehm HL, Bates DW. A novel clinician interface to improve clinician access to up-to-date genetic results. J Am Med Inform Assoc Feb; 21 (e1): e117-21 doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013–001965.
- 13 Glaser B, Straus AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction; 1967
- 14 Urquhart C, Lehmann H, Myers MD. Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal 2010; 20 (04) 357-381.
- 15 Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B, Roden DM, Williams MS, Wilson R, Bick D, Bottinger EP, Brilliant MH, Eng C, Frazer KA, Korf B, Ledbetter DH, Lupski JR, Marsh C, Mrazek D, Murray MF, O’Donnell PH, Rader DJ, Relling MV, Shuldiner AR, Valle D, Weinshiboum R, Green ED, Ginsburg GS. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med 2013; 15 (04) 258-267.
- 16 Ramos EM, Din-Lovinescu C, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Duncanson A, Dunn M, Good P, Hubbard TJ, Jarvik GP, O’Donnell C, Sherry ST, Aronson N, Biesecker LG, Blumberg B, Calonge N, Colhoun HM, Epstein RS, Flicek P, Gordon ES, Green ED, Green RC, Hurles M, Kawamoto K, Knaus W, Ledbetter DH, Levy HP, Lyon E, Maglott D, McLeod HL, Rahman N, Randhawa G, Wicklund C, Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Williams MS. Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014; 166C (01) 93-104.
- 17 Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17 (05) 405-424 doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30.
- 18 Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, Maglott DR. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42 (Database issue): D980-5.
- 19 Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. 2016 Available from: http://www.genome.gov/27540473