Case Report: Patient Portal versus Telephone Recruitment for a Surgical Research Study
11. September 2014
accepted: 29. November 2014
19. Dezember 2017 (online)
Background: Patient portal adoption has rapidly increased over the last decade. Most patient portal research has been done in primary care or medical specialties, and few studies have examined their use in surgical patients or for recruiting research subjects. No known studies have compared portal messaging with other approaches of recruitment.
Objectives: This case report describes our experience with patient portal versus telephone recruitment for a study involving long-term follow up of surgical patients.
Methods: Participants were recruited for a study of recurrence after ventral hernia repair through telephone calls and patient portal messaging based on registration status with the portal. Potential subjects who did not have a portal account or whose portal messages were returned after 5 days were called. The proportion of participants enrolled with each method was determined and demographics of eligible patients, portal users, and participants were compared.
Results: 1359 patients were eligible for the hernia study, and enrollment was 35% (n=465). Most participants were recruited by telephone (84%, n=391); 16% (n=74) were recruited through portal messaging. Forty-four percent of eligible participants had a registered portal account, and 14% of users responded to the recruitment message. Portal users were younger than non-users (55 vs. 58 years, p<0.001); participants recruited through the portal versus telephone were also younger (54 vs. 59 years, p=0.001). Differences in the sex and racial distributions between users and non-users and between portal and telephone recruits were not significant.
Conclusions: Portal versus telephone recruitment for a surgical research study demonstrated modest portal recruitment rates and similar demographics between recruitment methods. Published studies of portal-only recruitment in primary care or medical-specialty patient populations have demonstrated higher enrollment rates, but this case study demonstrates that portal recruitment for research studies in the surgical population is feasible, and it offers convenience to patients and researchers.
Citation: Baucom RB, Ousley J, Poulose BK, Rosenbloom ST, Jackson GP. Case report: Patient portal versus telephone recruitment for a surgical research study. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 1005–1014
- 1 Patient portal [Website]. Wikepedia Foundation, Inc.; [updated May 25, 2014; cited 2014 June 4, 2014]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_portal.
- 2 Lin C-T, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Beaty LB, Ross ES. An Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication System: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7 (04) e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.4.e47.
- 3 McCarrier KP, Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Lewis G, Martin DP, Zimmerman FJ, Goldberg HI. Web-based collaborative care for type 1 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2009; 11 (04) 211-217. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0063.
- 4 Krist AH, Woolf SH, Rothemich SF, Johnson RE, Peele JE, Cunningham TD, Longo DR, Bello GA, Matzke GR. Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial. Annals of family medicine 2012; 10 (04) 312-319. doi: 10.1370/afm.1383.
- 5 Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6 (02) e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e12.
- 6 Wright A, Poon EG, Wald J, Feblowitz J, Pang JE, Schnipper JL, Grant RW, Gandhi TK, Volk LA, Bloom A, Williams DH, Gardner K, Epstein M, Nelson L, Businger A, Li Q, Bates DW, Middleton B. Randomized controlled trial of health maintenance reminders provided directly to patients through an electronic PHR. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (01) 85-92. doi: 10.1007/s11606–011–1859–6.
- 7 Green BB, Cook AJ, Ralston JD, Fishman PA, Catz SL, Carlson J, Carrell D, Tyll L, Larson EB, Thompson RS. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 2008; 299 (24) 2857-2867. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.24.2857.
- 8 Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Hoath J, Mullen M, Cheadle A, Goldberg HI. Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes care 2009; 32 (02) 234-239. doi: 10.2337/dc08–1220.
- 9 Tang PC, Overhage JM, Chan AS, Brown NL, Aghighi B, Entwistle MP, Hui SL, Hyde SM, Klieman LH, Mitchell CJ, Perkins AJ, Qureshi LS, Waltimyer TA, Winters LJ, Young CY. Online disease management of diabetes: engaging and motivating patients online with enhanced resources-diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (03) 526-534. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001263.
- 10 Simon GE, Ralston JD, Savarino J, Pabiniak C, Wentzel C, Operskalski BH. Randomized trial of depression follow-up care by online messaging. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26 (07) 698-704. doi: 10.1007/s11606–011–1679-8.
- 11 Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, Towfigh AA, Haggstrom DA, Miake-Lye I, Beroes JM, Shekelle PG. Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Annals of internal medicine 2013; 159 (10) 677-687. doi: 10.7326/0003–4819–159–10–201311190-00006.
- 12 Grant RW, Wald JS, Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, Orav EJ, Williams DH, Volk LA, Middleton B. Practice-linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of internal medicine 2008; 168 (16) 1776-1782. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1776.
- 13 Leveille S, Huang A, Tsai S, Weingart S, Iezzoni L. Screening for Chronic Conditions Using a Patient Internet Portal: Recruitment for an Internet-based Primary Care Intervention. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23 (04) 472-475.
- 14 Ancker JS, Barron Y, Rockoff ML, Hauser D, Pichardo M, Szerencsy A, Calman N. Use of an electronic patient portal among disadvantaged populations. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26 (10) 1117-1123. doi: 10.1007/s11606–011–1749-y.
- 15 Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Hasnain-Wynia R, Thompson JA, Baker DW. Disparities in enrollment and use of an electronic patient portal. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26 (10) 1112-1116. doi: 10.1007/s11606–011–1728-3.
- 16 Ralston JD, Rutter CM, Carrell D, Hecht J, Rubanowice D, Simon GE. Patient use of secure electronic messaging within a shared medical record: a cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24 (03) 349-355.
- 17 Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Adler NE, Nguyen R, Lopez A, Schillinger D. Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (03) 318-321. doi: jamia.2010.006015 [pii] 10.1136/jamia.2010.006015.
- 18 Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands DZ. Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (01) 91-95. doi: M1833 [pii] 10.1197/jamia. M1833.
- 19 Roblin DW, Houston TK, 2nd Allison JJ, Joski PJ, Becker ER. Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (05) 683-689. doi: M3169 [pii]10. 1197/jamia. M3169.
- 20 Kahn JS, Hilton JF, Van Nunnery T, Leasure S, Bryant KM, Hare CB, Thom DH. Personal health records in a public hospital: experience at the HIV/AIDS clinic at San Francisco General Hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17 (02) 224-228. doi: 17/2/224 [pii] 10.1136/jamia.2009.000315.
- 21 Miller H, Vandenbosch B, Ivanov D, Black P. Determinants of personal health record use: a large population study at Cleveland Clinic. J Healthc Inf Manag 2007; 21 (03) 44-48.
- 22 Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 2012; 16 (02) 179-183. doi: 10.1007/s10029–011–0879-9.
- 23 Osborn CY, Rosenbloom ST, Stenner SP, Anders S, Muse S, Johnson KB, Jirjis J, Jackson GP. MyHealthAt-Vanderbilt: policies and procedures governing patient portal functionality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (01) i18-i23. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011–000184.