State Funding for Health Information Technology and Selected Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures
12 February 2014
Accepted in revised form: 19 May 2014
21 December 2017 (online)
Background: Previous studies on the effects of health information technology (health IT) on ambulatory quality have had mixed results. New York State has invested heavily in health IT throughout the State, creating a unique opportunity to assess effects on health care quality across multiple communities.
Objective: To determine any association between primary care providers’ receipt of funding from New York State’s Healthcare Efficiency and Affordability Law for New Yorkers Program (HEAL NY) and ambulatory quality of care
Methods: A statewide, longitudinal cohort study of primary care physicians in New York State was conducted. Data regarding which primary care physicians received funding through the HEAL NY program (Phase 5 or Phase 10) in 2008 or 2009 were obtained from the New York State Department of Health. Health care quality in 2010 was measured using claims data that had been aggregated across 7 commercial health plans across the state. Physicians were divided into 2 groups, based on receipt of HEAL funding (yes/no). Any association was measured between study group and each of 7 quality measures, all of which appear in the Stage 1 federal Meaningful Use program. Negative binomial regression was used, adjusting for provider gender and specialty.
Results: The study included 3,988 primary care providers, of whom 863 (22%) had received HEAL NY funding. The HEAL-funded physicians provided higher quality of care on 5 of the 7 measures: breast cancer screening, eye exams in patients with diabetes, nephropathy screening in patients with diabetes, influenza vaccination and pneumococcal vaccination (p<0.0001 for all adjusted comparisons). The HEAL-funded group provided higher quality of care by an absolute 2 to 6 percentage points per measure for those 5 measures.
Conclusion: Primary care physicians who received state funding for health IT provided higher quality of care than those who did not receive such funding.
Citation: Kern LM, Silver M, Kaushal R; with the HITEC Investigators. State funding for health information technology and selected ambulatory healthcare quality measures. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 594–602 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0108
- 1 Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, Hebert CJ. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 825-833.
- 2 Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC. Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 456-463.
- 3 Garrido T, Jamieson L, Zhou Y, Wiesenthal A, Liang L. Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ 2005; 330: 581.
- 4 Keyhani S, Hebert PL, Ross JS, Federman A, Zhu CW, Siu AL. Electronic health record components and the quality of care. Med Care 2008; 46: 1267-1272.
- 5 Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1400-1405.
- 6 Poon EG, Wright A, Simon SR. et al. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care 2010; 48: 203-209.
- 7 Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic Health Records and Clinical Decision Support Systems: Impact on National Ambulatory Care Quality. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 897-903.
- 8 Walsh MN, Yancy CW, Albert NM. et al. Electronic health records and quality of care for heart failure. Am Heart J 2010; 159: 635-462 e1.
- 9 Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA. et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 457-464.
- 10 Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23: 655-670.
- 11 Hincapie A, Warholak T. The impact of health information exchange on health outcomes. Applied Clinical Informatics 2011; 2: 499-507.
- 12 Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 382-385.
- 13 Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The „Meaningful Use“ Regulation for Electronic Health Records. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 501-504.
- 14 New York State Department of Health.. Healthcare Efficiency and Affordability Law for New Yorkers Capital Grant Program. (Accessed on May 14, 2014, at http://www.health.ny.gov/technology/efficien cy_and_affordability_law/.)
- 15 New York State Department of Health.. Health information technology. (Accessed on May 14, 2014, at http://www.health.ny.gov/technology/.)
- 16 Kern LM, Wilcox AB, Shapiro J. et al. Community-based health information technology alliances: potential predictors of early sustainability. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17: 290-295.
- 17 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Final Rule. 75 Federal Register 44314 (2010) (42 CFR Parts 412, 413, 422 and 495).
- 18 Kern LM, Barron Y, Abramson EL, Patel V, Kaushal R. HEAL NY: Promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28: 493-504.
- 19 Kern LM, Kaushal R. Health information technology and health information exchange in New York State: new initiatives in implementation and evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40: S17-S20.
- 20 Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed?. JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-1748.
- 21 National Quality Forum.. Measure evaluation criteria. (Accessed May 8, 2014, at https://www.qualityfor um.org/docs/measure_evaluation_criteria.aspx.
- 22 Kern LM, Edwards A, Kaushal R. The patient-centered medical home, electronic health records, and quality of care. Ann Intern Med (In press).
- 23 Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S. et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 742-752.
- 24 Kern LM, Barron Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Edwards A, Kaushal R. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28: 496-503.