Appl Clin Inform 2012; 03(04): 377-391
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2012-01-RA-0002
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Duplicate Orders: An Unintended Consequence of Computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) Implementation

Analysis and Mitigation Strategies
S. Magid
1   Hospital for Special Surgery, Quality Research Center, New York
,
C. Forrer
1   Hospital for Special Surgery, Quality Research Center, New York
,
S. Shaha
2   University of Utah, Center for Policy and Public Administration, Salt Lake City
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 06 May 2012

Accepted 26 September 2012

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objective: Computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) with clinical decision support (CDS) is designed to improve patient safety. However, a number of unintended consequences which include duplicate ordering have been reported. The objective of this time-series study was to characterize duplicate orders and devise strategies to minimize them.

Methods: Time series design with systematic weekly sampling for 84 weeks. Each week we queried the CPOE database, downloaded all active orders onto a spreadsheet, and highlighted duplicate orders. We noted the following details for each duplicate order: time, order details (e.g. drug, dose, route and frequency), ordering prescriber, including position and role, and whether the orders originated from a single order or from an order set (and the name of the order set). This analysis led to a number of interventions, including changes in: order sets, workflow, prescriber training, pharmacy procedures, and duplicate alerts.

Results: Duplicates were more likely to originate from different prescribers than from same prescribers; and from order sets than from single orders. After interventions, there was an 84.8% decrease in the duplication rate from weeks 1 to 84 and a 94.6% decrease from the highest (1) to the lowest week (75). Currently, we have negligible duplicate orders.

Conclusions: Duplicate orders can be a significant unintended consequence of CPOE. By analyzing these orders, we were able to devise and implement generalizable strategies that significantly reduced them. The incidence of duplicate orders before CPOE implementation is unknown, and our data originate from a weekly snapshot of active orders, which serves as a sample of total active orders. Thus, it should be noted that this methodology likely under-reports duplicate orders.

Citation: Magid S, Forrer C, Shaha S. Duplicate Orders: An unintended consequence of computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) implementation. Analysis and mitigation strategies. Appl Clin Inf 2012; 3: 377–391

http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2012-01-RA-0002

 
  • References

  • 1 Kuperman GJ, Gibson RF. Computer physician order entry: benefits, costs, and issues. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 31-39.
  • 2 Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J. et. al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. A systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 1223-1228.
  • 3 Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin DJ, Powe NR. Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 108-114.
  • 4 Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine.. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000
  • 5 Bates DW, Kuperman G, Teich JM. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care 1994; 2: 18-27.
  • 6 Institute of Safe Medical Practice.. ISMP’s Guidelines for Standard Order Sets. Available at: http://www.ismp.org/Tools/guidelines/StandardOrderSets.pdf. Accessed April 25, 2010.
  • 7 Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma’Luf N. et. al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6: 313-321.
  • 8 Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices Arch Intern Med 2000. 160 2741-2741.
  • 9 Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE. et. al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; 293: 1197-1203.
  • 10 Nebeker JR, Hoffman JM, Weir CR, Bennett CL, Hurdle JF. High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1111-1116.
  • 11 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RSB, Watson RS, Nguyen TC. et. al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1506-1512.
  • 12 Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 547-556.
  • 13 Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended socio-technical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (Suppl. 01) S21-S27.
  • 14 Ash JS, Sittig DF, Poon EG, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra RH. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 415-423.
  • 15 McNutt RA, Abrams R, Arons DC. Patient Safety Committee.. Patient safety efforts should focus on medical errors. JAMA 2002; 287: 1997-2001.
  • 16 Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowles JB. “e-Iatrogenesis”: the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT. Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 387-388.
  • 17 Evans KD, Benham SW, Garrard CS. A comparison of handwritten and computer-assisted prescriptions in an intensive care unit. Crit Care 1998; 2 (Suppl. 02) 73-78.
  • 18 Colpaert K, Claus B, Somers A, Vandewoude K, Robays H, Decruyenaere J. Impact of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors in the intensive care unit: a controlled cross-sectional trial. Crit Care 2006; 10 (Suppl. 01) R21.
  • 19 Kuperman GJ, Bobb A, Payne TH, Avery AJ, Gandhi TK, Burns G. et. al. Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 29-40.
  • 20 Spencer DC, Leininger A, Daniels R, Granko RP, Coeytaux RR. Effect of a computerized prescriber-order-entry system on reported medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 15 (62) (4) 16-9.
  • 21 George D, Austin-Bishop N. Error rates for computerized order entry by physicians versus nonphysicians. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2003; 60: 2250-2252.
  • 22 Fitzhenry F, Peterson JF, Arrieta M, Waitman LR, Schildcrout JS, Miller RA. Medication administration discrepancies persist despite electronic ordering. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 756-764.
  • 23 Schedlbauer A, Prasad V, Mulvaney C, Phansalkar S, Stanton W, Bates DW. et. al. What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians’ prescribing behavior?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 531-538.
  • 24 Reckmann MH, Westbrook JI, Koh Y, Lo C, Day RO. Does computerized provider order entry reduce prescribing errors for hospital inpatients? A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (Suppl. 05) 613-623.
  • 25 Wetterneck TB, Walker JM, Blosky MA, Cartmill RS, Hoonakker P, Johnson MA. et. al. Factors contributing to an increase in duplicate medication order errors after CPOE implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (Suppl. 06) 774-782.
  • 26 Kuperman GJ, Reichley RM, Bailey TC. Using commercial knowledge bases for clinical decision support: opportunities, hurdles, and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 369-371.
  • 27 van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 138-147.
  • 28 Senholzi C, Gottlieb J. Pharmacist interventions after implementation of computerized prescriber order entry. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003; 60: 1880-1882.
  • 29 Fair MA, Pane F. Pharmacist interventions in electronic drug orders entered by prescribers. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004; 61: 1286-1288.
  • 30 Magid SK, Pancoast PE, Fields T, Bradley DG, Williams RB. Employing clinical decision support to attain our strategic goal: the safe care of the surgical patient. J Healthc Inf Manag 2007; 21: 18-25.
  • 31 Rind DM, Safran C, Phillips RS, Wang Q, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. et. al. Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1511-1517.
  • 32 Weingart SN, Toth M, Sands DZ, Aronson MD, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Physicians’ decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2625-2631.
  • 33 Lin CP, Payne TH, Nichol WP, Hoey PJ, Anderson CL, Gennari JH. Evaluating clinical decision support systems: monitoring CPOE order check override rates in the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Computerized Patient Record System. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 620-626.
  • 34 Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 104-112.
  • 35 Sittig DF, Ash JS. Clinical Information Systems; Overcoming Adverse Consequences. 1st ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2011