Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14(01): 108-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760082
Research Article

Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Decision Support for Pediatric Infections

Erin A. McGonagle
1   Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Dean J. Karavite
2   Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Robert W. Grundmeier
2   Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Sarah K. Schmidt
1   Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Larissa S. May
3   Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Davis School of Medicine, Davis, California, United States
,
Daniel M. Cohen
4   Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Andrea T. Cruz
5   Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Shin-Ping Tu
6   Department of Medicine, University of California at Davis School of Medicine, Davis, California, United States
,
Lalit Bajaj
1   Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Peter S. Dayan
7   Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States
,
Rakesh D. Mistry
8   Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
› Author Affiliations

Funding This work was supported by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R21 Exploratory and Developmental Grant program (grant no.: R21AI139839).
Preview

Abstract

Objectives Clinical decision support (CDS) has promise for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in the emergency department (ED). We sought to assess the usability of a newly developed automated CDS to improve guideline-adherent antibiotic prescribing for pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and urinary tract infection (UTI).

Methods We conducted comparative usability testing between an automated, prototype CDS-enhanced discharge order set and standard order set, for pediatric CAP and UTI antibiotic prescribing. After an extensive user-centered design process, the prototype CDS was integrated into the electronic health record, used passive activation, and embedded locally adapted prescribing guidelines. Participants were randomized to interact with three simulated ED scenarios of children with CAP or UTI, across both systems. Measures included task completion, decision-making and usability errors, clinical actions (order set use and correct antibiotic selection), as well as objective measures of system usability, utility, and workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). The prototype CDS was iteratively refined to optimize usability and workflow.

Results Usability testing in 21 ED clinical providers demonstrated that, compared to the standard order sets, providers preferred the prototype CDS, with improvements in domains such as explanations of suggested antibiotic choices (p < 0.001) and provision of additional resources on antibiotic prescription (p < 0.001). Simulated use of the CDS also led to overall improved guideline-adherent prescribing, with a 31% improvement for CAP. A trend was present toward absolute workload reduction. Using the NASA-TLX, workload scores for the current system were median 26, interquartile ranges (IQR): 11 to 41 versus median 25, and IQR: 10.5 to 39.5 for the CDS system (p = 0.117).

Conclusion Our CDS-enhanced discharge order set for ED antibiotic prescribing was strongly preferred by users, improved the accuracy of antibiotic prescribing, and trended toward reduced provider workload. The CDS was optimized for impact on guideline-adherent antibiotic prescribing from the ED and end-user acceptability to support future evaluative trials of ED ASPs.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The current study was deemed exempt by our institutional review board.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 07 May 2022

Accepted: 16 November 2022

Article published online:
08 February 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany