Design, Implementation, Utilization, and Sustainability of a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources–Based Inpatient Rounding List

Abstract

Objective We designed and implemented an application programming interface (API)-based electronic health record (EHR)-integrated rounding list and evaluated acceptability, clinician satisfaction, information accuracy, and efficiency related to the application.

Methods We developed and integrated an application, employing iterative design techniques with user feedback. EHR and application user action logs, as well as hospital safety reports, were evaluated. Rounding preparation characteristics were obtained through surveys before and after application integration. To evaluate usability, inpatient providers, including residents, fellows, and attendings were surveyed 2 weeks prior to and 6 months after enterprise-wide EHR application integration. Our primary outcome was provider time savings measured by user action logs; secondary outcomes include provider satisfaction.

Results The application was widely adopted by inpatient providers, with more than 69% of all inpatients queried by the application within 6 months of deployment. Application utilization was sustained throughout the study period with 79% (interquartile range [IQR]: 76, 82) of enterprise-wide unique patients accessed per weekday. EHR action logs showed application users spent −3.24 minutes per day (95% confidence interval [CI]: −6.8, 0.33), p = 0.07 within the EHR compared with nonusers. Median self-reported chart review time for attendings decreased from 30 minutes (IQR: 15, 60) to 20 minutes (IQR: 10, 45) after application integration (p = 0.04). Self-reported sign-out preparation time decreased by a median of 5 minutes (p < 0.01), and providers were better prepared for hand-offs (p = 0.02). There were no increased safety reports during the study period.

Conclusion This study demonstrates successful integration of a rounding application within a commercial EHR using APIs. We demonstrate increasing both provider-reported satisfaction and time savings. Rounding lists provided more accurate and timely information for rounds. Application usage was sustained across multiple specialties at 42 months. Other application designers should consider data density, optimization of provider workflows, and using real-time data transfer using novel tools when designing an application.

Keywords

medical informatics - health care delivery - electronic health records and systems - medical informatics applications - teaching rounds

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study involved human subjects are was reviewed and approved by the Wake Forest University Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (identifier: IRB00073502).

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. September 2021

Angenommen: 12. Dezember 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Februar 2022

• References

• 1 Tsai C-Y, Pancoast P, Duguid M, Tsai C. Hospital rounding–EHR's impact. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2014; 27 (07) 605-615
• 2 Krawiec C, Marker C, Stetter C, Kong L, Thomas NJ. Tracking resident pre-rounding electronic health record usage. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2019; 32 (03) 611-620
• 3 Kochendorfer KM, Morris LE, Kruse RL, Ge BG, Mehr DR. Attending and resident physician perceptions of an EMR-generated rounding report for adult inpatient services. Fam Med 2010; 42 (05) 343-349
• 4 Aziz F, Talhelm L, Keefer J, Krawiec C. Vascular surgery residents spend one fifth of their time on electronic health records after duty hours. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69 (05) 1574-1579
• 5 Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Alyousef B. et al. Impact of electronic health record technology on the work and workflow of physicians in the intensive care unit. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (08) 578-594
• 6 Artis KA, Dyer E, Mohan V, Gold JA. Accuracy of laboratory data communication on ICU daily rounds using an electronic health record. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (02) 179-186
• 7 Baba J, Thompson MR, Berger RG. Rounds reports: Early experiences of using printed summaries of electronic medical records in a large teaching medical hospital. Health Informatics J 2011; 17 (01) 15-23
• 8 Sampognaro PJ, Mitchell SL, Weeks SR. et al. Medical student appraisal: electronic resources for inpatient pre-rounding. Appl Clin Inform 2013; 4 (03) 403-418
• 9 Motulsky A, Wong J, Cordeau J-P, Pomalaza J, Barkun J, Tamblyn R. Using mobile devices for inpatient rounding and handoffs: an innovative application developed and rapidly adopted by clinicians in a pediatric hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (e1): e69-e78
• 10 Artis KA, Bordley J, Mohan V, Gold JA. Data omission by physician trainees on ICU rounds. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (03) 403-409
• 11 Raval MV, Rust L, Thakkar RK. et al. Development and implementation of an electronic health record generated surgical handoff and rounding tool. J Med Syst 2015; 39 (02) 8
• 12 Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Pellegrini CA. Organizing the transfer of patient care information: the development of a computerized resident sign-out system. Surgery 2004; 136 (01) 5-13
• 13 Van Eaton EG, Lober WB, Pellegrini CA, Horvath KD. User-driven design of a computerized rounding and sign-out application. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005; 2005: 1145
• 14 Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Rossini AJ, Pellegrini CA. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident work hours. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200 (04) 538-545
• 15 Sokoya M, Judge PD, Cabrera-Muffly C, Vila PM. Inpatient rounding practices in otolaryngology residency programs. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 156 (06) 1032-1034
• 16 Gopalan R, Berger R, Baba J. Rounds Report: An EMR Module That Enhances Inpatient Rounding. HIC 2009: Proceedings; Frontiers of Health Informatics-Redefining Healthcare, National Convention Centre Canberra, 19-21 August 2009. Brunswick East, Vic.: Health Informatics Society of Australia (HISA), 2009
• 17 Wohlauer MV, Rove KO, Pshak TJ. et al. The computerized rounding report: implementation of a model system to support transitions of care. J Surg Res 2012; 172 (01) 11-17
• 18 Dullabh P, Hovey L, Heaney-Huls K, Rajendran N, Wright A, Sittig DF. Application programming interfaces in health care: findings from a current-state sociotechnical assessment. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 59-69
• 19 Matney SA, Heale B, Hasley S. et al. Lessons learned in creating interoperable fast healthcare interoperability resources profiles for large-scale public health programs. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 87-95
• 20 McClure RC, Macumber CL, Skapik JL, Smith AM. Igniting harmonized digital clinical quality measurement through terminology, CQL, and FHIR. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 23-33
• 21 Labs Fishbone Template. Accessed April 20, 2021 at: https://creately.com/diagram/example/hqqrj91f2/Labs
• 22 FHIR v4.0.1. Accessed August 24, 2021 at: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/
• 23 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
• 24 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
• 25 Lye CT, Forman HP, Daniel JG, Krumholz HM. The 21st Century Cures Act and electronic health records one year later: will patients see the benefits?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (09) 1218-1220
• 26 Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Accessed June 19, 2017 at: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html.
• 27 Van Eaton EG, McDonough K, Lober WB, Johnson EA, Pellegrini CA, Horvath KD. Safety of using a computerized rounding and sign-out system to reduce resident duty hours. Acad Med 2010; 85 (07) 1189-1195