Predicting Health Care Providers' Acceptance of a Personal Health Record Secure Messaging Feature

Abstract

Background Personal health records (PHRs) can facilitate patient-centered communication through the secure messaging feature. As health care organizations in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia implement PHRs and begin to implement the secure messaging feature, studies are needed to evaluate health care providers' acceptance.

Objective The aim of this study was to identify predictors of health care providers' behavioral intention to support the addition of a secure messaging feature in PHRs using an adapted model of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology as the theoretical framework.

Methods Using a cross-sectional survey design, data on acceptance of secure messaging features in PHRs were collected from health care providers working at the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs between April and May 2021. The proposed model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling in SmartPLS.

Results There were 224 participants: female (66.5%), 40 to 49 years of age (39.9%), nurses (45.1%), and those working more than 10 years in the organization (68.8%). Behavioral intention to support the addition of a secure messaging feature was significantly influenced by performance expectancy (β = 0.21, p = 0.01) and attitude (β = 0.50, p < 0.01), while other predicting factors, such as effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating condition, did not significantly affect the intention. Furthermore, age, years of experience, and professional role did not moderate the relationships.

Conclusion Health care professionals will support introducing a secure messaging feature in the PHRs if they serve the intended purpose. Considering attitude also plays a significant role in acceptance, it is necessary to arrange for training and support, so that caregivers, health care providers, and the patients become familiar with the benefits and expected outcomes of using the feature.

Keywords

personal health records - secure messaging - UTAUT - eHealth - health care providers

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. All procedures involving human participants were approved by the institutional review boards of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center and Virginia Commonwealth University.

Publication History

Received: 31 July 2021

Accepted: 07 December 2021

Article published online:
09 February 2022

• References

• 1 Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27 (03) 759-769
• 2 Eysenbach G. What is e-health?. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3 (02) E20
• 3 Meier CA, Fitzgerald MC, Smith JM. eHealth: extending, enhancing, and evolving health care. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2013; 15 (01) 359-382
• 4 Gerber T, Olazabal V, Brown K, Pablos-Mendez A. An agenda for action on global e-health. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (02) 233-236
• 5 DeLuca JM, Enmark R. E-health: the changing model of healthcare. Front Health Serv Manage 2000; 17 (01) 3-15
• 6 Lancaster K, Abuzour A, Khaira M. et al. The use and effects of electronic health tools for patient self-monitoring and reporting of outcomes following medication use: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (12) e294
• 7 Murphy-Abdouch K, Dolezel D, McLeod A. Patient access to personal health information: an analysis of the consumer's perspective. Accessed June 11, 2020 at: https://perspectives.ahima.org/patient-accesstophi/
• 8 Holmgren AJ, Downing NL, Bates DW. et al. Assessment of electronic health record use between US and non-US health systems. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181 (02) 251-259
• 9 Finney Rutten LJ, Agunwamba AA, Greene SM. et al. Enabling patient-centered communication and care through health information technology. J Commun Healthc 2014; 7 (04) 255-261
• 10 Rathert C, Mittler JN, Banerjee S, McDaniel J. Patient-centered communication in the era of electronic health records: what does the evidence say?. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100 (01) 50-64
• 11 Hogan TP, Luger TM, Volkman JE. et al. Patient centeredness in electronic communication: evaluation of patient-to-health care team secure messaging. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (03) e82
• 12 Street Jr RL. How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92 (03) 286-291
• 13 Cronin RM, Davis SE, Shenson JA, Chen Q, Rosenbloom ST, Jackson GP. Growth of secure messaging through a patient portal as a form of outpatient interaction across clinical specialties. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (02) 288-304
• 14 Bouayad L, Ialynytchev A, Padmanabhan B. Patient health record systems scope and functionalities: literature review and future directions. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (11) e388
• 15 Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, Tang P. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8: 45
• 16 Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e44-e44
• 17 McAlearney AS, Fareed N, Gaughan A, MacEwan SR, Volney J, Sieck CJ. Empowering patients during hospitalization: perspectives on inpatient portal use. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 103-112
• 18 Kuo A, Dang S. Secure messaging in electronic health records and its impact on diabetes clinical outcomes: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22 (09) 769-777
• 19 Wade-Vuturo AE, Mayberry LS, Osborn CY. Secure messaging and diabetes management: experiences and perspectives of patient portal users. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (03) 519-525
• 20 Hagedorn PA, Kirkendall ES, Spooner SA, Mohan V. Inpatient communication networks: leveraging secure text-messaging platforms to gain insight into inpatient communication systems. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 471-478
• 21 Chung S, Panattoni L, Chi J, Palaniappan L. Can secure patient-provider messaging improve diabetes care?. Diabetes Care 2017; 40 (10) 1342-1348
• 22 Sieck CJ, Walker DM, Hefner JL, Volney J, Huerta TR, McAlearney AS. Understanding secure messaging in the inpatient environment: a new avenue for communication and patient engagement. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (04) 860-868
• 23 Alpert JM, Wang S, Bylund CL. et al. Improving secure messaging: A framework for support, partnership & information-giving communicating electronically (SPICE). Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104 (06) 1380-1386
• 24 Chen Y, Tang C, Doung V. et al. “I don't bother with the phone!”: Feeling closer to physician using secure messaging. Accessed December 27, 2021 at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a589/a6dabf87e6e0042c86422308f9666d061992.pdf
• 25 Hogan TP, Wakefield B, Nazi KM, Houston TK, Weaver FM. Promoting access through complementary eHealth technologies: recommendations for VA's Home Telehealth and personal health record programs. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26 (2, suppl 2) 628-635
• 26 Alpert JM, Markham MJ, Bjarnadottir RI, Bylund CL. Twenty-first century bedside manner: exploring patient-centered communication in secure messaging with cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 2021; 36 (01) 16-24
• 27 Alshahrani A, Stewart D, MacLure K. A systematic review of the adoption and acceptance of eHealth in Saudi Arabia: Views of multiple stakeholders. Int J Med Inform 2019; 128: 7-17
• 28 National Transformation Program. Published 2018. Accessed December 24, 2019 at: https://vision2030.gov.sa/sites/default/files/attachments/NTPEnglishPublicDocument_2810.pdf
• 29 AlBar AM, Hoque MR. Patient acceptance of e-health services in Saudi Arabia: an integrative perspective. Telemed J E Health 2019; 25 (09) 847-852
• 30 Center Strategy. National Health Information Center. Published 2021. Accessed October 6, 2021 at: https://nhic.gov.sa/en/AboutUs/Pages/StrategicObjectives.aspx
• 31 Alharbi MA. The status quo of health information technology and health information management efficiency in saudi arabia: a narrative review. International Journal of Health Research and Innovation. 2018; 6 (01) 11-23
• 32 AlSadrah SA. Electronic medical records and health care promotion in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2020; 41 (06) 583-589
• 33 Alsulame K, Khalifa M, Househ M. E-Health status in Saudi Arabia: a review of current literature. Health Policy Technol 2016; 5 (02) 204-210
• 34 Alsahafi YA, Gay V, Khwaji AA. Factors affecting the acceptance of integrated electronic personal health records in Saudi Arabia: the impact of e-health literacy. Health Inf Manag 2020;
• 35 Alhammad OS, McKibbon A. Assessing outpatients' attitudes and expectations towards electronic personal health records (ePHRs) systems in secondary and tertiary hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Health Inform Dev Ctries 2021;15(02):doi: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3997-2264
• 36 Al Sahan A, Saddik B. Al-Sahan A MSc (HI), Saddik B PhD, MPH. Perceived challenges for adopting the Personal Health Record (PHR) at Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA)- Riyadh. Online J Public Health Inform 2016; 8 (03) e205
• 37 Belcher T, Vess J, Johnson E. Using patient portal messaging to improve glycemic control in adult patients with diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Accessed December 27, 2021 at: https://www.himss.org/resources/using-patient-portal-messaging-improve-glycemic-control-adult-patients-diabetes-saudi
• 38 Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q 2003; 27 (03) 425-478
• 39 Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989; 35 (08) 982-1003
• 40 Abd-Alrazaq A, Bewick BM, Farragher T, Gardner P. Factors affecting patients' use of electronic personal health records in England: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (07) e12373
• 41 Tavares J, Oliveira T. Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: an acceptance model and survey. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (03) e49
• 42 Tripathi S. Moderating effects of age and experience on the factors influencing the actual usage of cloud computing. Journal of International Technology and Information Management. 2018; 27 (02) 121-15
• 43 Carlton EL, Holsinger Jr. JW, Anunobi N. Physician engagement with health information technology: Implications for practice and professionalism. International Journal of Computers in Clinical Practice. 2016; 1 (02) 51-73
• 44 Venkatesh V, Sykes TA, Zhang X. “Just what the doctor ordered”: A revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2011:1–10; Hawai, United States
• 45 Li J, Talaei-Khoei A, Seale H, Ray P, Macintyre CR. Health care provider adoption of ehealth: systematic literature review. Interact J Med Res 2013; 2 (01) e7
• 46 Kujala S, Hörhammer I, Kaipio J, Heponiemi T. Health professionals' expectations of a national patient portal for self-management. Int J Med Inform 2018; 117: 82-87
• 47 Wiljer D, Urowitz S, Apatu E. et al; Canadian Committee for Patient Accessible Health Records. Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10 (04) e34
• 48 MNGHA Organization Profile. Ministry of National Guard -Health Affairs. Published 2018. Accessed September 6, 2019 at: https://ngha.med.sa/English/AboutNGHA/Pages/profile.aspx
• 49 Yousef CC, Thomas A, Alenazi AO. et al. Adoption of a personal health record in the digital age: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (10) e22913
• 50 MNGHA Care Mobile Application. Published 2020. Accessed June 29, 2020 at: https://ngha.med.sa/English/eServices/Pages/patientportall.aspx
• 51 Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed.. New York, NY: Guilford publications; 2015
• 52 Haun JN, Hathaway W, Chavez M. et al. Clinical practice informs secure messaging benefits and best practices. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (04) 1003-1011
• 53 Chung M-H, Ho C-H, Wen H-C. Predicting intentions of nurses to adopt patient personal health records: a structural equation modeling approach. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2016; 136: 45-53
• 54 Hennemann S, Beutel ME, Zwerenz R. Ready for eHealth? Health professionals' acceptance and adoption of eHealth interventions in inpatient routine care. J Health Commun 2017; 22 (03) 274-284
• 55 Hoogenbosch B, Postma J, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Tiemessen NA, van Delden JJ, van Os-Medendorp H. Use and the users of a patient portal: Cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (09) e262
• 56 Khaneghah PA, Miguel-Cruz A, Bentley P, Liu L, Stroulia E, Ferguson-Pell M. Users' attitudes towards personal health records. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 573-586
• 57 Free Online Survey Software and Tools. Accessed October 8, 2021 at: https://www.questionpro.com/
• 58 Yousef CC, Salgado TM, Farooq A. et al. Health care providers' acceptance of a personal health record: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 (10) e31582
• 59 Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 2012; 36 (01) 157-178
• 60 Wu J, Du H. Toward a better understanding of behavioral intention and system usage constructs. Eur J Inf Syst 2012; 21 (06) 680-698
• 61 Williams MD, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. J Enterp Inf Manag 2015; 28 (03) 443-488
• 62 Balau M. Exploring the link between intention and behavior in consumer research. EIRP Proceedings. Accessed December 27, 2021 at: http://proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1864/2200
• 63 Dünnebeil S, Sunyaev A, Blohm I, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H. Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (11) 746-760
• 64 Yousef CC, Salgado TM, Farooq A. et al. Predicting Patients' Intention to Use a Personal Health Record Using an Adapted Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model: Secondary Data Analysis. JMIR Med Inform 2021; 9 (08) e30214
• 65 IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Accessed December 27, 2021 at: https://www.ibm.com/in-en/analytics/spss-statistics-software
• 66 Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM. SmartPLS 3.0. Hamburg, Germany. Accessed December 27, 2021 at: https://www.smartpls.com/
• 67 Tavares J, Oliveira T. Electronic health record portal adoption: a cross country analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17 (01) 97
• 68 Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW. Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in” MIS Quarterly”. MIS Quarterly 2012; 36 (01) iii-xiv
• 69 Farooq A, Ahmad F, Khadam N, Lorenz B, Isoaho J. The Impact of Perceived Security on Intention to use E-Learning Among Students. In: 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT);2020:360–364; Tartu, Estonia
• 70 Farooq A, Laato S, Islam AKMN, Isoaho J. Understanding the impact of information sources on COVID-19 related preventive measures in Finland. Technol Soc 2021; 65: 101573
• 71 Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev 2014; 26 (02) 106-121
• 72 Bennani A, Belalia M, Oumlil R. As a human factor, the attitude of healthcare practitioners is the primary step for the e-health: first outcome of an ongoing study in Morocco. Commun IBIMA. 2008; 3: 28
• 73 Djamasbi S, Fruhling A, Loiacono E. The influence of affect, attitude and usefulness in the acceptance of telemedicine systems. J Inf Technol Theory Appl 2009; 10 (01) 41-58
• 74 Nazi KM. The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (04) e70
• 75 Ibrahim S, Donelle L, Regan S, Sidani S. Predicting registered nurses' behavioural intention to use electronic documentation system in home care: application of an adapted unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Nursing Leadership 2019; 32 (02) 48-70
• 76 Alanazi B, Butler-Henderson K, Alanazi MR. Factors influencing healthcare professionals' perception towards EHR/EMR systems in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: a systematic review. Oman Med J 2020; 35 (06) e192
• 77 Abd-Alrazaq A, Alalwan AA, McMillan B, Bewick BM, Househ M, Al-Zyadat AT. Patients' adoption of electronic personal health records in england: secondary data analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (10) e17499
• 78 Park HS, Kim KI, Soh JY, Hyun YH, Jang SK, Lee S, Hwang GY, Kim HS. Factors influencing acceptance of personal health record apps for workplace health promotion: cross-sectional questionnaire study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 (06) e16723
• 79 Abd-Alrazaq AAE. Factors affecting patients' use of electronic personal health records. University of Leeds 2018
• 80 Adenuga KI, Iahad NA, Miskon S. Towards reinforcing telemedicine adoption amongst clinicians in Nigeria. Int J Med Inform 2017; 104: 84-96
• 81 Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Jeyaraj A, Clement M, Williams MD. Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Inf Syst Front 2019; 21 (03) 719-734
• 82 Hassounah M, Raheel H, Alhefzi M. Digital response during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (09) e19338
• 83 Gagnon M-P, Payne-Gagnon J, Breton E. et al. Adoption of electronic personal health records in Canada: perceptions of stakeholders. Int J Health Policy Manag 2016; 5 (07) 425-433
• 84 Lluch M. Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80 (12) 849-862
• 85 Feinberg J, Shaw S, Kashyap N. et al. Evaluating the impact of a new smartphone texting tool on patient care in obstetrics, an emergent healthcare setting. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 879-887
• 86 Tsega S, Kalra A, Sevilla CT, Cho HJ. A bottom-up approach to encouraging sustained user adoption of a secure text messaging application. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (02) 326-330
• 87 Al Knawy B, Adil M, Crooks G. et al. The Riyadh Declaration: the role of digital health in fighting pandemics. Lancet 2020; 396 (10262): 1537-1539