Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12(04): 897-909
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735179
Research Article

Examining the Concordance in the Documented Pressure Injury Site, Stage, and Count in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III

Wenhui Zhang
1  Center for Data Science, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
,
Mani Sotoodeh
2  Department of Computer Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
,
Joyce C. Ho
2  Department of Computer Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
,
Roy L. Simpson
1  Center for Data Science, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
,
Vicki S. Hertzberg
1  Center for Data Science, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported with grant funding from the National Institutes of Health and National Library of Medicine (grant no.: NIH/NLM 1R01 LM013323–01, PIs: Vicki Hertzberg, Joyce Ho, Roy Simpson).

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to compare the concordance of pressure injury (PI) site, stage, and count documented in electronic health records (EHRs); explore if PI count during each patient hospitalization is consistent based on PI site or stage count in the diagnosis or chart event records; and examine if discrepancies in PI count were associated with patient characteristics.

Methods Hospitalization records with the International Classification of Diseases ninth edition (ICD-9) codes, chart events from two systems (CareVue, MetaVision), and clinical notes on PI were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. PI site and stage counts from individual hospitalization were computed. Hospitalizations with the same or different counts of site and stage according to ICD-9 codes (site and stage), CareVue (site and stage), or MetaVision (stage) charts were defined as consistent or discrepant reporting. Chi-squared, independent t-, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were examined if the count discrepancy was associated with patient characteristics. ICD-9 codes and charts were also compared for people with one site or stage.

Results A total of 31,918 hospitalizations had PI data. Within hospitalizations with ICD-9-coded sites and stages, 55.9% reported different counts. Within hospitalizations with CareVue charts on PI, 99.3% reported the same count. For hospitalizations with stages based on ICD-9 codes or MetaVision chart data, only 42.9% reported the same count. Discrepancies in counts were consistently and significantly associated with variables including PI recording in clinical notes, dead/hospice at discharge, more caregivers, longer hospitalization or intensive care unit stays, and more days to first transfer. Discrepancies between ICD-9 code and chart values on the site and stage were also reported.

Conclusion Patient characteristics associated with PI count discrepancies identified patients at risk of having discrepant PI counts or worse outcomes. PI documentation quality could be improved with better communication, care continuity, and integrity. Clinical research using EHRs should adopt systematic data quality analysis to inform limitations.

Author Contributions

All authors conceptualized the study. W.Z. designed and conducted the data analysis. M.S. conducted the data management. W.Z. is responsible for the integrity of the work. W.Z. drafted the manuscript. All authors participated in writing and revising the paper. All aspects of the study (design; management, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparing report; and decision to publish) were led by the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human subjects were recruited for this study.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 07 March 2021

Accepted: 20 July 2021

Publication Date:
29 September 2021 (online)

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany