Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12(02): 245-250
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726103
Research Article

Searching the PDF Haystack: Automated Knowledge Discovery in Scanned EHR Documents

Alexander L. Kostrinsky-Thomas
1  College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, 200 University Pkwy Yakima, Washington, United States
,
Fuki M. Hisama
2  Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Thomas H. Payne
3  Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Clinicians express concern that they may be unaware of important information contained in voluminous scanned and other outside documents contained in electronic health records (EHRs). An example is “unrecognized EHR risk factor information,” defined as risk factors for heritable cancer that exist within a patient's EHR but are not known by current treating providers. In a related study using manual EHR chart review, we found that half of the women whose EHR contained risk factor information meet criteria for further genetic risk evaluation for heritable forms of breast and ovarian cancer. They were not referred for genetic counseling.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the use of automated methods (optical character recognition with natural language processing) versus human review in their ability to identify risk factors for heritable breast and ovarian cancer within EHR scanned documents.

Methods We evaluated the accuracy of the chart review by comparing our criterion standard (physician chart review) versus an automated method involving Amazon's Textract service (Amazon.com, Seattle, Washington, United States), a clinical language annotation modeling and processing toolkit (CLAMP) (Center for Computational Biomedicine at The University of Texas Health Science, Houston, Texas, United States), and a custom-written Java application.

Results We found that automated methods identified most cancer risk factor information that would otherwise require clinician manual review and therefore is at risk of being missed.

Conclusion The use of automated methods for identification of heritable risk factors within EHRs may provide an accurate yet rapid review of patients' past medical histories. These methods could be further strengthened via improved analysis of handwritten notes, tables, and colloquial phrases.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This project was approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board.




Publication History

Received: 06 December 2020

Accepted: 01 February 2021

Publication Date:
24 March 2021 (online)

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany