Direct Observational Study of Interfaced Smart-Pumps in Pediatric Intensive CareFunding This study was supported by National Children's Research Centre (D/14/1).
Background Processes for delivery of high-risk infusions in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are complex. Standard concentration infusions (SCIs), smart-pumps, and electronic prescribing are recommended medication error reduction strategies. Implementation rates in Europe lag behind those in the United States. Since 2012, the PICU of an Irish tertiary pediatric hospital has been using a smart-pump SCI library, interfaced with electronic infusion orders (Philips ICCA). The incidence of infusion errors is unknown.
Objectives To determine the frequency, severity, and distribution of smart-pump infusion errors in PICUs.
Methods Programmed infusions were directly observed at the bedside. Parameters were compared against medication orders and autodocumented infusion data. Identified deviations were categorized as medication errors or discrepancies. Error rates (%) were calculated as infusions with errors and errors per opportunities for error (OEs). Predefined definitions, multidisciplinary consensus and grading processes were employed.
Results A total of 1,023 infusions for 175 patients were directly observed over 27 days between February and September 2017. The drug library accommodated 96.5% of infusions. Compliance with the drug library was 98.9%. A total of 133 infusions had ≥1 error (13.0%); a further 58 (5.7%) had ≥1 discrepancy. From a total of 4,997 OEs, 153 errors (3.1%) and 107 discrepancies (2.1%) were observed. Undocumented bolus doses were most commonly identified (n = 81); this was the only deviation in 36.1% (n = 69) of infusions. Programming errors were rare (0.32% OE). Errors were minor, with just one requiring minimal intervention to prevent harm.
Conclusion The error rates identified are low compared with similar studies, highlighting the benefits of smart-pumps and autodocumented infusion data in PICUs. A range of quality improvement opportunities has been identified.
Keywordscritical care - pediatrics - error reduction - smart-pumps - information system - documentation
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
There was no direct patient involvement in this study. Observations were limited to infusion pumps and electronic data within the PICU clinical information management system.
Received: 08 May 2020
Accepted: 28 July 2020
07 October 2020 (online)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York
- 1 McLeod MC, Barber N, Franklin BD. Methodological variations and their effects on reported medication administration error rates. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22 (04) 278-289
- 2 Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM. Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Drug Saf 2013; 36 (11) 1045-1067
- 3 Pinkney S, Fan M, Chan K. et al. Multiple intravenous infusions phase 2b: Laboratory study. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2014; 14 (05) 1-163
- 4 Lehmann CU, Kim GR, Gujral R, Veltri MA, Clark JS, Miller MR. Decreasing errors in pediatric continuous intravenous infusions. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7 (03) 225-230
- 5 Institute for Safe Medication Practices. ISMP list of high-alert medications in acute care settings. Available at: https://forms.ismp.org/Tools/institutionalhighAlert.asp . Accessed March 2020
- 6 Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Guidelines for optimizing safe implementation and use of smart infusion pumps. Available at: https://www.ismp.org/guidelines/safe-implementation-and-use-smart-pumps . Accessed June 2020
- 7 Sheikh A. Realising the potential of health information technology to enhance medication safety. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 29 (01) 7-9
- 8 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Standardize 4 safety initiative. Available at: https://www.ashp.org/pharmacy-practice/standardize-4-safety-initiative . Accessed February 2020
- 9 JCAHO's compliance expectations for standardized concentrations. Rule of Six in pediatrics does not meet requirements. Jt Comm Perspect 2004; 25 (05) 11
- 10 Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: prescribing and transcribing-2016. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2017; 74 (17) 1336-1352
- 11 Oskarsdottir T, Harris D, Sutherland A, Wignell A, Christiansen N. A national scoping survey of standard infusions in paediatric and neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom. J Pharm Pharmacol 2018; 70 (10) 1324-1331
- 12 UK Department of Health and Social Care. Medication errors: short life working group report : recommendations to reduce medication-related harm in England. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/medication-errors-short-life-working-group-report . Accessed March 2020
- 13 Lyons I, Furniss D, Blandford A. et al. Errors and discrepancies in the administration of intravenous infusions: a mixed methods multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 2018; 27 (11) 892-901
- 14 Howlett MM. National smart-pump drug library of paediatric and neonatal standardised concentration infusions. Available at: https://www.ehealthireland.ie/Case%20Studies/National-Smart-Pump-Drug-Library-of-Paediatric-and-Neonatal-Standardised-Concentration-Infusions-/ . Accessed March 2020
- 15 Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI). PSI baseline study of hospital pharmacy. Available at: https://www.thepsi.ie/Libraries/Publications/PSI_Hospital_Baseline_Study_Report_2012.sflb.ashx . Accessed January 2020
- 16 Furniss D, Dean Franklin B, Blandford A. The devil is in the detail: how a closed-loop documentation system for IV infusion administration contributes to and compromises patient safety. Health Informatics J 2020; 26 (01) 576-591
- 17 Blandford A, Dykes PC, Franklin BD. et al. Intravenous infusion administration: a comparative study of practices and errors between the United States and England and their implications for patient safety. Drug Saf 2019; 42 (10) 1157-1165
- 18 Ohashi K, Dalleur O, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Benefits and risks of using smart-pumps to reduce medication error rates: a systematic review. Drug Saf 2014; 37 (12) 1011-1020
- 19 Schnock KO, Dykes PC, Albert J. et al. The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26 (02) 131-140
- 20 Hennings S, Romero A, Erstad BL, Franke H, Theodorou AA. A comparison of automated infusion device technology to prevent medication errors in pediatric and adult intensive care unit patients. Hosp Pharm 2010; 45 (06) 464-471
- 21 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST. et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (06) 1506-1512
- 22 Korb-Savoldelli V, Boussadi A, Durieux P, Sabatier B. Prevalence of computerized physician order entry systems-related medication prescription errors: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2018; 111: 112-122
- 23 Westbrook JI, Baysari MT, Li L, Burke R, Richardson KL, Day RO. The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (06) 1159-1167
- 24 Philips. Critical care and anesthesia. Available at: https://www.philips.ie/healthcare/product/HCNOCTN332/intellispace-critical-care-and-anesthesia . Accessed June 2020
- 25 Dean B, Barber N. Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58 (01) 54-59
- 26 Taxis K, Barber N. Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors. BMJ 2003; 326 (7391): 684
- 27 Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47 (03) 555-571
- 28 Howlett MM, Cleary BJ, Breatnach CV. Defining electronic-prescribing and infusion-related medication errors in paediatric intensive care - a Delphi study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18 (01) 130
- 29 Rothschild JM, Keohane CA, Cook EF. et al. A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2005; 33 (03) 533-540
- 30 Westbrook JI, Rob MI, Woods A, Parry D. Errors in the administration of intravenous medications in hospital and the role of correct procedures and nurse experience. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20 (12) 1027-1034
- 31 National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. About medication errors: what is a medication error?. Available at: https://www.nccmerp.org/about-medication-errors . Accessed December 2019
- 32 Dean BS, Barber ND. A validated, reliable method of scoring the severity of medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999; 56 (01) 57-62
- 33 Russell RA, Murkowski K, Scanlon MC. Discrepancies between medication orders and infusion pump programming in a paediatric intensive care unit. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (Suppl. 03) i31-i35
- 34 Manrique-Rodríguez S, Sánchez-Galindo AC, López-Herce J. et al. Impact of implementing smart infusion pumps in a pediatric intensive care unit. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013; 70 (21) 1897-1906
- 35 Howlett MM, Butler E, Lavelle KM, Cleary BJ, Breatnach CV. The impact of technology on prescribing errors in pediatric intensive care: a before and after study. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (02) 323-335
- 36 Schneider PJ, Pedersen CA, Scheckelhoff DJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: dispensing and administration-2017. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2018; 75 (16) 1203-1226
- 37 Irish Department of Health and Children. eHealth strategy for Ireland. Available at: https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/6b7909-ehealth-strategy-for-ireland/?referrer=/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ireland_ehealth_strategy.pdf/ . Accessed June 2020
- 38 Armstrong S. Hospitals that are leading the way to a digital future. BMJ 2017; 356: j1366
- 39 Chuk A, Maloney R, Gawron J, Skinner C. Utilizing electronic health record information to optimize medication infusion devices: a manual data integration approach. J Healthc Qual 2016; 38 (06) 370-378
- 40 Institute for Safe Medication Practices. EHR-smart pump interoperability resulted in electronic documentation of different flow rates. Available at: https://www.ismp.org/resources/ehr-smart-pump-interoperability-resulted-electronic-documentation-different-flow-rates . Accessed March 2020
- 41 Biltoft J, Finneman L. Clinical and financial effects of smart pump-electronic medical record interoperability at a hospital in a regional health system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2018; 75 (14) 1064-1068