PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(04): 598-605
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715829
Research Article

Registered Nurse Strain Detection Using Ambient Data: An Exploratory Study of Underutilized Operational Data Streams in the Hospital Workplace

Dana M. Womack
1   Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
,
Michelle R. Hribar
1   Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
,
Linsey M. Steege
2   School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
,
Nancy H. Vuckovic
3   Experience Design, Cambia Health Solutions, Portland, Oregon, United States
,
Deborah H. Eldredge
4   Nursing Administration, Oregon Health & Science University Healthcare, Portland, Oregon, United States
,
Paul N. Gorman
1   Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
› Institutsangaben Funding This study was supported by the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS026370) and U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15-LM007088). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Library of Medicine or Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The sponsors had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Registered nurses (RNs) regularly adapt their work to ever-changing situations but routine adaptation transforms into RN strain when service demand exceeds staff capacity and patients are at risk of missed or delayed care. Dynamic monitoring of RN strain could identify when intervention is needed, but comprehensive views of RN work demands are not readily available. Electronic care delivery tools such as nurse call systems produce ambient data that illuminate workplace activity, but little is known about the ability of these data to predict RN strain.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of ambient workplace data, defined as time-stamped transaction records and log file data produced by non-electronic health record care delivery tools (e.g., nurse call systems, communication devices), as an information channel for automated sensing of RN strain.

Methods In this exploratory retrospective study, ambient data for a 1-year time period were exported from electronic nurse call, medication dispensing, time and attendance, and staff communication systems. Feature sets were derived from these data for supervised machine learning models that classified work shifts by unplanned overtime. Models for three timeframes —8, 10, and 12 hours—were created to assess each model's ability to predict unplanned overtime at various points across the work shift.

Results Classification accuracy ranged from 57 to 64% across three analysis timeframes. Accuracy was lowest at 10 hours and highest at shift end. Features with the highest importance include minutes spent using a communication device and percent of medications delivered via a syringe.

Conclusion Ambient data streams can serve as information channels that contain signals related to unplanned overtime as a proxy indicator of RN strain as early as 8 hours into a work shift. This study represents an initial step toward enhanced detection of RN strain and proactive prevention of missed or delayed patient care.

Keywords

machine learning - workplace - nursing - informatics - secondary analysis - stress - real time - health system

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Oregon Health and Science University Institutional Review Board.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 20. Juli 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Oliveira AC, Garcia PC, Nogueira LS. Nursing workload and occurrence of adverse events in intensive care: a systematic review. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2016; 50 (04) 683-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bragadóttir H, Kalisch BJ, Tryggvadóttir GB. Correlates and predictors of missed nursing care in hospitals. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26 (11–12): 1524-1534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002; 288 (16) 1987-1993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Pankratz VS, Leibson CL, Stevens SR, Harris M. Nurse staffing and inpatient hospital mortality. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (11) 1037-1045
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jones SK, Griep Y. “I can only work so hard before I burn out.” A time sensitive conceptual integration of ideological psychological contract breach, work effort, and burnout. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Steege LM, Rainbow JG. Fatigue in hospital nurses - ‘Supernurse’ culture is a barrier to addressing problems: a qualitative interview study. Int J Nurs Stud 2017; 67: 20-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 See KC, Zhao MY, Nakataki E. , et al; SABA Study Investigators and the Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group. Professional burnout among physicians and nurses in Asian intensive care units: a multinational survey. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44 (12) 2079-2090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Poncet MC, Toullic P, Papazian L. , et al. Burnout syndrome in critical care nursing staff. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175 (07) 698-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Litvak E, Bisognano M. More patients, less payment: increasing hospital efficiency in the aftermath of health reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30 (01) 76-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12 (06) 573-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Woods D, Branlat M. Basic patterns in how adaptive systems fail. In: Hollnagel E, Paries J, Woods D, Wreathall J. , eds. Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group; 2011: 127-144
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Halpern SD. ICU capacity strain and the quality and allocation of critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17 (06) 648-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Willis E, Harvey C, Thompson S, Pearson M, Meyer A. Work intensification and quality assurance: missed nursing care. J Nurs Care Qual 2018; 33 (02) E10-E16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tucker AL, Spear SJ. Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing. Health Serv Res 2006; 41 (3, Pt 1): 643-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kalisch BJ, Xie B. Errors of omission: missed nursing care. West J Nurs Res 2014; 36 (07) 875-890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Roth C, Wieck KL, Fountain R, Haas BK. Hospital nurses' perceptions of human factors contributing to nursing errors. J Nurs Adm 2015; 45 (05) 263-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fasoli DR, Haddock KS. Results of an integrative review of patient classification systems. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2010; 28: 295-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hollnagel E. The ETTO Principle: Efficiency–Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Chassin MR, Loeb JM. High-reliability health care: getting there from here. Milbank Q 2013; 91 (03) 459-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Womack DM, Vuckovic NN, Steege LM, Eldredge DH, Hribar MR, Gorman PN. Subtle cues: qualitative elicitation of signs of capacity strain in the hospital workplace. Appl Ergon 2019; 81: 102893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Murphy K. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Pedregosa P, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A. , et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2011; 12: 2825-2830
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Myny D, Van Hecke A, De Bacquer D. , et al. Determining a set of measurable and relevant factors affecting nursing workload in the acute care hospital setting: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49 (04) 427-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Myny D, Van Goubergen D, Gobert M, Vanderwee K, Van Hecke A, Defloor T. Non-direct patient care factors influencing nursing workload: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67 (10) 2109-2129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Carayon P, Gürses AP. A human factors engineering conceptual framework of nursing workload and patient safety in intensive care units. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2005; 21 (05) 284-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kalisch BJ, Tschannen D, Lee H, Friese CR. Hospital variation in missed nursing care. Am J Med Qual 2011; 26 (04) 291-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Patterson ES, Ebright PR, Saleem JJ. Investigating stacking: how do registered nurses prioritize their activities in real-time?. Int J Ind Ergon 2011; 41 (04) 389-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Benner P, Tanner C, Chesla C. , eds. Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment, and Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2009
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cook R, Rasmussen J. “Going solid”: a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14 (02) 130-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Tubbs-Cooley HL, Mara CA, Carle AC, Mark BA, Pickler RH. Association of nurse workload with missed nursing care in the neonatal intensive care unit. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173 (01) 44-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ball JE, Murrells T, Rafferty AM, Morrow E, Griffiths P. ‘Care left undone’ during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23 (02) 116-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Steege LM, Pinekenstein BJ, Rainbow JG, Arsenault Knudsen É. Addressing occupational fatigue in nurses: current state of fatigue risk management in hospitals, part 1. J Nurs Adm 2017; 47 (09) 426-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Padgett SM. Professional collegiality and peer monitoring among nursing staff: an ethnographic study. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50 (10) 1407-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sharples S, Houghton RJ. The field becomes the laboratory? The impact of the contextual digital footprint on the discipline of E/HF. Ergonomics 2017; 60 (02) 270-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Brennan PF, Bakken S. Nursing needs big data and big data needs nursing. J Nurs Scholarsh 2015; 47 (05) 477-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Friedman CP, Wong AK, Blumenthal D. Achieving a nationwide learning health system. Sci Transl Med 2010; 2 (57) 57cm29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Matney SA, Settergren TT, Carrington JM, Richesson RL, Sheide A, Westra BL. Standardizing physiologic assessment data to enable big data analytics. West J Nurs Res 2017; 39 (01) 63-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar