Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(01): 104-111
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701252
Research Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Successful Usage of the DICOM Images Exchange System (ePACS) in the Czech Republic

Jan Bruthans 
1   Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

03 September 2019

13 December 2019

Publication Date:
05 February 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The picture archiving and communication system (PACS) has already replaced classic hard copy film technology. With new functions of PACS under consideration, attention turns to the sharing of medical images between different institutions. The Czech Republic is one of the few countries using a nation-wide medical images exchange system known as ePACS. It is based on dedicated hardware and one central router, although theoretical models tend to prefer cloud-based sharing.

Objective Despite its simple design and lack of advanced features, this system has successively evolved into a widely used tool. The aim of this article is to offer an overview of its use and functions and to show that even a simple system can be widely used.

Methods Using data from the producer of ePACS (the ICZ company) and from other sources, the system was described and data about its performance have been obtained.

Results Every acute-care hospital (140) and about a quarter of outpatient facilities (105) in the Czech Republic are now equipped with ePACS and are therefore able to share medical images. The number of studies transmitted rises every year, from 12,000 in 2008 to more than 640,000 in 2018, which is approximately 4% of all studies produced. The system was primarily designed and is used to share images between acute-care hospitals but a very special usage has also evolved, as it is employed in a teleradiology service with private enterprises too.

Conclusion ePACS is expanding in the Czech Republic despite having only limited functions and despite its principle that simply copies a classic workflow when sending studies on Compact Discs. Although other systems for image sharing might be more advanced, ePACS brings to the Czech health care system the capability to exchange medical images on a national level.

Keywords

DICOM - PACS - information systems - cloud computing - radiology information systems

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

Human and/or animal subjects were not included in the project.


 

  • References

  • 1 Huang HK. Short history of PACS. Part I: USA. Eur J Radiol 2011; 78 (02) 163-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lemke HU. Short history of PACS (part II: Europe). Eur J Radiol 2011; 78 (02) 177-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Song JW, Mango MC, Museru LM. , et al. Successful Implementation of a PACS in Tanzania. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14 (05) 710-713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schooley B, Hikmet N, Atilgan E. Health IT Maturity and Hospital Quality: Effects of PACS Automation and Integration Levels on U.S. Hospital Performance. Published at: 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). Las Vegas, NV: IEEE; 2016: 45-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Siegel E, Reiner B. Work flow redesign: the key to success when using PACS. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178 (03) 563-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hise JH. And then came the PACS. JAMA 2017; 318 (04) 331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Faggioni L, Neri E, Castellana C, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C. The future of PACS in healthcare enterprises. Eur J Radiol 2011; 78 (02) 253-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sodickson A, Opraseuth J, Ledbetter S. Outside imaging in emergency department transfer patients: CD import reduces rates of subsequent imaging utilization. Radiology 2011; 260 (02) 408-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lu MT, Tellis WM, Fidelman N, Qayyum A, Avrin DE. Reducing the rate of repeat imaging: import of outside images to PACS. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (03) 628-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Flanagan PT, Relyea-Chew A, Gross JA, Gunn ML. Using the internet for image transfer in a regional trauma network: effect on CT repeat rate, cost, and radiation exposure. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9 (09) 648-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Erickson BJ. Experience with importation of electronic images into the medical record from physical media. J Digit Imaging 2011; 24 (04) 694-699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Flanders AE. Medical image and data sharing: are we there yet?. Radiographics 2009; 29 (05) 1247-1251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Al-Hajeri M, Clarke M. Future trends in Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Published at: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Milan: IEEE; 2015: 6844-6847 ; Doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319965
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 The Royal College of Radiologists. IT Guidance: National Strategy for Radiology Image and Report Sharing. London, United Kingdom: The Royal College of Radiologist; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Public health and promoting interoperability programs (formerly, known as electronic health records meaningful use). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ehrmeaningfuluse/introduction.html . Accessed January 16, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Parikh A, Mehta N. Web-based PACS and EHR system. Published at: Proc. SPIE 9418, Medical Imaging 2015: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations. Orlando, FL: 2015: 94180A ; Doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2081975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kharat AT, Safvi A, Thind S, Singh A. Cloud computing for radiologists. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22 (03) 150-154
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Silva LAB, Costa C, Oliveira JL. A PACS archive architecture supported on cloud services. Int J CARS 2012; 7 (03) 349-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mendelson DS, Bak PRG, Menschik E, Siegel E. Informatics in radiology: image exchange: IHE and the evolution of image sharing. Radiographics 2008; 28 (07) 1817-1833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Fernandez-Bayó J. IHE profiles applied to regional PACS. Eur J Radiol 2011; 78 (02) 250-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Silva LAB, Costa C, Oliveira JL. DICOM relay over the cloud. Int J CARS 2013; 8 (03) 323-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ge Y, Ahn DK, Unde B, Gage HD, Carr JJ. Patient-controlled sharing of medical imaging data across unaffiliated healthcare organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (01) 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Weisser G, Walz M, Ruggiero S. , et al. Standardization of teleradiology using Dicom e-mail: recommendations of the German Radiology Society. Eur Radiol 2006; 16 (03) 753-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kanagaraj G, Sumathi AC. Proposal of an open-source Cloud computing system for exchanging medical images of a Hospital Information System. Published at: 3rd International Conference on Trendz in Information Sciences & Computing (TISC2011). Chennai, India: IEEE; 2011: 144-149 ; Doi: 10.1109/TISC.2011.6169102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mendelson DS, Erickson BJ, Choy G. Image sharing: evolving solutions in the age of interoperability. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11 (12, Pt B): 1260-1269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ross P, Sepper R, Pohjonen H. Cross-border teleradiology-experience from two international teleradiology projects. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73 (01) 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kondoh H, Teramoto K, Kawai T, Mochida M, Nishimura M. Development of the regional EPR and PACS sharing system on the infrastructure of cloud computing technology controlled by patient identifier cross reference manager. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 192: 1073-1073
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ma W, Sartipi K, Sharghi H, Koff D, Bak P. OpenID connect as a security service in Cloud-based diagnostic imaging systems. Published at: Proc. SPIE 9418, Medical Imaging 2015: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations. Orlando, FL: 2015: 94180J ; Doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 O' Reilly MF, Breathnach OP, Mohamed KM, Sheehan EC. The “National Integrated Medical Imaging System” [NIMIS]—friend, not nimesis!. Ir J Med Sci (1971) 2018; 188 (02) 365-369
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 ePACS 2019. Available at: http://www.epacs.cz/epacs/faces/pages/index.xhtml . Accessed February 6, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 ePACS: medical facilities. 2019 . Available at: http://www.epacs.cz/epacs/faces/pages/hcu-list.xhtml;jsessionid=116fm64ah28mz1ncdqklif5ypo . Accessed February 10, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vainiomäki S, Aalto A-M, Lääveri T. , et al. Better usability and technical stability could lead to better work-related well-being among physicians. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (04) 1057-1067
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Purkayastha S, Gichoya JW, Addepally SA. Implementation of a single sign-on system between practice, research and learning systems. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (01) 306-312
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Institute of Health Information and Statistics. Health statistics yearbook of the Czech Republic 2017. Available at: http://www.uzis.cz/publikace/zdravotnicka-rocenka-ceske-republiky-2017 . Accessed January 16, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Radiology and imaging methods. Available at: https://www.uzis.cz/category/tematicke-rady/zdravotnicka-statistika/radiologie-zobrazovaci-metody . Accessed January 16, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar