An Evaluation of System End-User Support during Implementation of an Electronic Health Record Using the Model for Improvement Framework
30 May 2019
23 November 2019
18 December 2019 (online)
Background Electronic health record (EHR) system implementation is complex. Strong support for clinicians and other end-users during the initial phase of implementation requires dedicated resources and commitment to ensure a smooth transition, reduce frustration, and assist in adoption.
Objectives Evaluate end-user support processes and personnel employed during the initial phase of EHR implementation at an academic medical center and identify facilitators of success, challenges, and lessons learned.
Methods Using the model for improvement framework, this case report describes the activities that follow the concepts of planning, doing, studying, and acting (PDSA) when providing on-site support to system end users during an EHR implementation in a complex health care system.
Results Strengths included engaged and supportive leadership, use of internal support personnel, use of zone leaders, daily huddles for effective dissemination of information, and an evaluation survey tool to provide data supporting rapid changes in support personnel allocation. Challenges primarily surrounded the management of over 1,000 external support personnel which included limited EHR system knowledge, scheduling, and transportation logistics.
Conclusion Implementation of EHR systems continues. Supporting end users is one aspect of these complex projects that require dedicated resources to manage effectively. Organizations taking a more proactive approach, based on learning from experiences, as well as from other health care organizations, can improve their ability to take on this challenge armed with best practices and lessons learned.
Keywordsimplementation and deployment - clinical information systems - electronic health records and systems - leadership (enterprise level) - facilitators and barriers - adoption - evaluation - process improvement - satisfaction
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This work falls into the category of nonresearch/quality improvement and IRB approval was not required.
- 1 Shahmoradi L, Darrudi A, Arji G, Farzaneh Nejad A. Electronic health record implementation: A SWOT analysis. Acta Med Iran 2017; 55 (10) 642-649
- 2 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2018 Report to Congress: Annual update on the adoption of a nationwide system for the electronic use and exchange of health information. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/page/2018-12/2018-HITECH-report-to-congress.pdf . Accessed December 5, 2019
- 3 Research KLAS. U.S. hospital EMR market share 2017. Available at: https://klasresearch.com/report/us-hospital-emr-market-share-2017/1182 . Accessed December 5, 2019
- 4 Shachak A, Montgomery C, Dow R. , et al. End-user support for primary care electronic medical records: a qualitative case study of users' needs, expectations and realities. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2013; 2 (03) 198-212
- 5 Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10 (01) 231
- 6 Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD. , et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167 (05) 507-512
- 7 Colicchio TK, Borbolla D, Colicchio VD. , et al. Looking behind the curtain: identifying factors contributing to changes on care outcomes during a large commercial EHR implementation. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2019; 7 (01) 21
- 8 Jaén CR. Successful health information technology implementation requires practice and health care system transformation. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9 (05) 388-389
- 9 Bossen C, Jensen LG, Udsen FW. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (10) 940-953
- 10 Novak LL, Anders S, Gadd CS, Lorenzi NM. Mediation of adoption and use: a key strategy for mitigating unintended consequences of health IT implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (06) 1043-1049
- 11 O'Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown K, Shiffman RN. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (01) 43-49
- 12 Myers K. At-the-elbow physician support a must-have for EHR implementations. Available at: http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/healthitexchange/CommunityBlog/at-the-elbow-physician-support-a-must-have-for-ehr-implementations/ . Accessed December 5, 2019
- 13 Institute for Healthcare Improvement. How to improve. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx . Accessed December 5, 2019
- 14 Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care--an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (05) 542-549