PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10(05): 820-840
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697906
Research Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Determinants of M-Health Adoption in Developing Countries: An Empirical Investigation

Ahmad Alaiad
1   Department of Computer Information Systems, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
Mohammad Alsharo
2   Department of Information Systems, Al Albayt University, Mafraq, Jordan
,
Yazan Alnsour
3   Accounting and Computer Information Systems Department, Monfort College of Business, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

02. April 2019

18. August 2019

Publikationsdatum:
30. Oktober 2019 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The potential benefit of mobile health (M-Health) in developing countries for improving the efficiency of health care service delivery, health care quality, and patient safety, as well as reducing cost, has been increasingly recognized and emphasized in the last few years.

Objective Limited research has investigated the facilitators and barriers for the adoption of M-Health in developing countries to secure successful implementation of the technology. To fill this knowledge gap, we propose an integrative model that explains the patient's adoption behavior of M-Health in developing countries grounded on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, dual-factor model, and health belief model.

Method We empirically tested and evaluated the model based on data collected using a survey method from 280 patients living in a developing country. Partial least squares (PLS-SEM) technique was used for data analysis.

Results The results showed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, perceived health threat, M-Health app quality, and life quality expectancy have a direct positive effect on patients’ intention to use M-Health. The results also showed that security and privacy risks have a direct negative effect on the patient's intention to use M-Health. However, resistance to change was found to have an indirect negative effect on patients’ intention to use M-Health through the performance expectancy.

Conclusion The research contributes to the existing literature of health information systems and M-Health by better understanding how technological, social, and functional factors are associated with digital health applications and services use and success in the context of developing countries. With the widespread availability of mobile technologies and services and the growing demand for M-Health apps, this research can help guide the development of the next generation of M-Health apps with a focus on the needs of patients in developing countries. The research has several theoretical and practical implications for the health care industry, government, policy makers, and technology developers and designers.

Keywords

M-Health - technology acceptance - UTAUT - dual-factor model - health belief model - M-Health in developing countries

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was reviewed and approved by Jordan University of Science and Technology Institutional Review Board.


Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Kahn JG, Yang JS, Kahn JS. ‘Mobile’ health needs and opportunities in developing countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (02) 252-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sam S. Towards an empowerment framework for evaluating mobile phone use and impact in developing countries. Telemat Inform 2017; 34 (01) 359-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Househ M, Borycki M, Kushniruk W, Alofaysan S. mHealth: a passing fad or here to stay?. In: Rodrigues J, de la Torre Díez I, Sainz B. , eds. Telemedicine and e-Health Services, Policies, and Applications: Advancements and Developments. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2012: 151-178
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Economist. Mobile health apps are becoming more capable and potentially rather useful. Available at: http://www.economist.com/news/business/21694523-mobile-health-apps-are-becoming-more-capable-and-potentially-rather-useful-things-are-looking . Published 2016. Accessed January 2, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Barton. Mobile Health Technologies and Global Markets. BCC Publishing; 2017. Available at: https://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/healthcare/mobile-health-technologies-report.html . Accessed December 12, 2018
    PubMed
  • 6 Krebs P, Duncan DT. Health app use among US mobile phone owners: a national survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 3 (04) e101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Aitken M, Gauntlett C. Patient Apps for Improved Healthcare: from Novelty to Mainstream. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Yu P, Wu MX, Yu H, Xiao G. The challenges for the adoption of m-health. Paper presented at: the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics; July 10, 2016, Beijing, China
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Luxton D, McCann R, Bush N, Mishkind M, Reger G. mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2011; 42 (06) 505-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 ITU. Statistics. Available at: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx 2018 . Accessed September 3, 2019
    PubMed
  • 11 Gallagher J, O'Donoghue J, Car J. Managing immune diseases in the smartphone era: how have apps impacted disease management and their future?. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015; 11 (04) 431-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chib A, van Velthoven MH, Car J. mHealth adoption in low-resource environments: a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries. J Health Commun 2015; 20 (01) 4-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Alsharo M. Attitudes towards cloud computing adoption in emerging economies. Int J Cloud Appl Comput 2017; 7 (03) 44-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jordan’s Telecommunication Regularity Commission (2019). Available at: https://trc.gov.jo/Pages/viewpage?pageID=215 . Accessed September 3, 2019
    PubMed
  • 15 Venkatesh M, Davis D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q 2003; 27 (03) 425-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cenfetelli R. Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage. J Assoc Inf Syst 2004; 5 (11) 472-492
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cenfetelli R, Benbasat I, Al-Natour S. Addressing the what and how of online services: positioning supporting-services functionality and service quality for business-to-consumer success. Inf Syst Res 2008; 19 (02) 161-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 1984; 11 (01) 1-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 1989; 13 (03) 319-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rogers M. Diffusion of Innovations.5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Pbk ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50 (02) 179-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rahimi B, Nadri H, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Timpka T. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (03) 604-634
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zhou T. Examining location based services usage from the perspectives of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and privacy risk. J Electron Commerce Res 2012; 13 (02) 135-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kijsanayotin B, Pannarunothai S, Speedie SM. Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: applying the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (06) 404-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Alzahrani M, Goodwin R. Towards a UTAUT-based model for the study of E-government citizen acceptance in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Econ. Manage. Sci 2012; 6 (04) 109-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hoque R, Sorwar G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform 2017; 101: 75-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Quaosar GMAA, Hoque MR, Bao Y. Investigating factors affecting elderly's intention to use m-health services: an empirical study. Telemed J E Health 2018; 24 (04) 309-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 1992; 22 (14) 1111-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jovanov E. Wireless technology and system integration in body area networks for m-health applications. Paper presented at: the 27th IEEE Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; September 1, 2006; Shanghai, China
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Nkosi M, Mekuria F. Cloud computing for enhanced mobile health applications. Paper presented at: the 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom); November 30, 2010; Indiana, United States
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hoque MR. An empirical study of mHealth adoption in a developing country: the moderating effect of gender concern. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Onaolapo S, Oyewole O. Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions as factors influencing smart phones use for mobile learning by postgraduate students of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning 2018; 14: 095-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Pai F, Huang K. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2011; 78 (04) 650-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Carlsson B. Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Res Policy 2006; 35 (01) 56-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Taylor S, Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res 1995; 6 (02) 144-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Nadri H, Rahimi B, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Samadbeik M, Garavand A. Factors affecting acceptance of hospital information systems based on extended technology acceptance model: a case study in three paraclinical departments. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 238-247
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sun Y, Wang N, Guo X, Peng Z. Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: a comparison and integration of alternative models. J Electron Commerce Res 2013; 14 (02) 183-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Boontarig W, Chutimaskul W, Chongsuphajaisiddhi V, Papasratorn B. Factors influencing the Thai elderly intention to use smartphone for e-Health services. Paper presented at: the IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research; 24–27 June 2012; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Dwivedi Y, Shareef M, Simintiras A, Lal B, Weerakkody V. A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Gov Inf Q 2016; 33 (01) 174-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wills MJ, El-Gayar OF, Bennett D. Examining healthcare professionals'acceptance of electronic medical records using UTAUT. Issues Inf Syst 2008; 9 (02) 396-401
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ahadzadeh AS, Pahlevan Sharif S, Ong FS, Khong KW. Integrating health belief model and technology acceptance model: an investigation of health-related internet use. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zhang X, Han X, Dang Y, Meng F, Guo X, Lin J. User acceptance of mobile health services from users' perspectives: the role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance. Inform Health Soc Care 2017; 42 (02) 194-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rogers M. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Free Press; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Lapointe L, Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q 2005; 29 (03) 461-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Freudenheim M. Many hospitals resist computerized patient care. New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/06/business/many-hospitals-resist-computerized-patient-care.html . Published April 6, 2004. Accessed September 3, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N. Reconceptualizing organizational support and itseffect on information technology usage: evidence from the health care sector. J Comput Inf Syst 2008; 48 (04) 69-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Laumer S, Eckhardt A. Why do people reject technologies: a review of user resistance theories. In: Dwivedi YK, Wade MR, Scheneberger SL. , eds. Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Springer; 2012: 63-86
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Samhan B, Joshi D. Understanding electronic health records resistance: a revealed causal mapping approach. Int J Electron Healthc 2017; 9 (02) 100-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Özdemir-Güngör D, Camgöz-Akdağ H. Examining the effects of technology anxiety and resistance to change on the acceptance of breast tumor registry system: evidence from Turkey. Technol Soc 2018; 54: 66-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Guo X, Sun Y, Wang N, Peng Z, Yan Z. The dark side of elderly acceptance of preventive mobile health services in China. Electron Mark 2012; 23 (01) 49-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (01) 159-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Yuan S, Ma W, Kanthawala S, Peng W. Keep using my health apps: discover users' perception of health and fitness apps with the UTAUT2 model. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21 (09) 735-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Rosenstock I. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr 1974; 2 (04) 328-335
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Ahn T, Ryu S, Han I. The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Inf Manage 2007; 44 (03) 263-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Calisir F, Altin Gumussoy C, Bayraktaroglu A, Karaali D. Predicting the intention to use a web-based learning system: perceived content quality, anxiety, perceived system quality, image, and the technology acceptance model. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 2014; 24 (05) 515-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Srinivasan A. Alternative measures of system effectiveness: associations and implications. Manage Inf Syst Q 1985; 9 (03) 243-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Wang Y, Liao Y. The conceptualization and measurement of m-commerce user satisfaction. Comput Human Behav 2007; 23 (01) 381-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D. Mytilene E-guide: a multiplatform mobile application tourist guide exemplar. Multimedia Tools Appl 2010; 54 (02) 241-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Floh A, Treiblmaier H. What keeps the e-banking customer loyal? A multigroup analysis of the moderating role of consumer characteristics on E-loyalty in the financial service industry. J Electron Commer Res 2006; 7 (02) 97-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Schaupp C, Fan W, Belanger F. Determining success for different website goals. Paper presented at: the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS'06; January 4, 2006, Hawaii, United States
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Sweeney M, Paruchuri K, Weingart SN. Going mobile: resident physicians' assessment of the impact of tablet computers on clinical tasks, job satisfaction, and quality of care. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (03) 588-594
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Li Z, Jiao Y. The impact of website and offline equality on relationship quality: an empirical study on e-retailing. Paper presented at: the 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing WiCOM'08; March 2, 2008; Dalian, China
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Nelson R, Todd P, Wixom B. Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. J Manage Inf Syst 2005; 21 (04) 199-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Wixom B, Todd P. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf Syst Res 2005; 16 (01) 85-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Chang S, Tung F. An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British J Educ Technol 2007; 39 (01) 71-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Lee J, Lee W. The relationship of e-Learner's self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-Learning environmental quality. Comput Human Behav 2008; 24 (01) 32-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Wu J, Wang S. What drives mobile commerce?. Inf Manage 2005; 42 (05) 719-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev 2007; 64 (06) 650-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Aydin S, Özer G. National customer satisfaction indices: an implementation in the Turkish mobile telephone market. Mark Intell Plann 2005; 23 (05) 486-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Burnham T, Frels J, Mahajan V. Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. J Acad Mark Sci 2003; 31 (02) 109-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Ho Cheong J, Park M. Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Res 2005; 15 (02) 125-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Dai H, Palvi P. Mobile commerce adoption in China and the United States. ACM SIGMIS Database 2009; 40 (04) 43-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Lin F, Lu I, Hsieh P. Understanding the adoption of wireless sensor network service in households. Paper presented at: the 2011 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences (IJCSS); May 25, 2011; Taipei, Taiwan
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK. Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (12) 788-801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Schulz R. Quality of Life Technology Handbook.1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 77 Schulz R, Beach R, Matthews T, Courtney L, Dabbs V. Designing and evaluating quality of life technologies: an interdisciplinary approach. Proc IEEE 2012; 100 (08) 2397-2409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Price Waterhouse and Coopers. Emerging mhealth: paths for growth. 2013 . Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/healthcare/mhealth/assets/pwc-emerging-mhealth-full.pdf . Accessed June 20, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Research Now SSI. Are mobile health apps good for our health?. 2015 . Available at: https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/population-health-management/mobile-health-mhealth/news/13024830/survey-doctors-and-patients-see-benefits-in-mobile-apps . Accessed June 27, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Boult C, Green AF, Boult LB, Pacala JT, Snyder C, Leff B. Successful models of comprehensive care for older adults with chronic conditions: evidence for the Institute of Medicine's “retooling for an aging America” report. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57 (12) 2328-2337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Berry-Millett R, Bodenheimer TS. Care management of patients with complex health care needs. Synth Proj Res Synth Rep 2009; 19 (19) 52-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Culley M, Herman J, Smith D, Tavakoli A. Effects of technology and connectedness on community dwelling older adults. Online J Nurs Inform 2013; 17 (03) 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Menon S, Sarkar S. Privacy and Big data: scalable approaches to sanitize large transactional databases for sharing. Manage Inf Syst Q 2016; 40 (04) 963-981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Narayanan A, Shmatikov V. Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. Paper presented at: the 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy; May 18, 2008; California, United States
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Pass G, Chowdhury A, Torgeson C. A picture of search. Paper presented at: the First International Conference on Scalable Information Systems. May 30, 2006; Hong Kong, 75(1):29–41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Westin A. Privacy and Freedom. Washington and Lee Law Review 1968; 25 (01) 166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Dehzad F, Hilhorst C, de Bie C, Claassen E. Adopting health apps, what's hindering doctors and patients?. Health (Irvine Calif) 2014; 06 (16) 2204-2217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Tuch A, Presslaber E, Stöcklin M, Opwis K, Bargas-Avila J. The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2012; 70 (11) 794-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Wu I, Li J, Fu C. The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: an integrative perspective. Decis Support Syst 2011; 51 (03) 587-596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Laxman K, Krishnan S, Dhillon J. Barriers to adoption of consumer health informatics applications for self-management. Health Sci J 2015; 9 (5–7): 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Angst C, Agarwal R. Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: the elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. Manage Inf Syst Q 2009; 33 (02) 339-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Becker D. Acceptance of mobile mental health treatment applications. Paper presented at: the 6th International Conference on Current and Future Trends of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare (ICTH 2016). Procedia Comput Sci 2016; 98: 220-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G. Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Cho J, Lee HE, Kim SJ, Park D. Effects of body image on college students' attitudes toward diet/fitness apps on smartphones. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2015; 18 (01) 41-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Eze C, Goh H, Ling Y, Lee H. Intention to use e-government services in Malaysia: perspective of individual users. Paper presented at: the International Conference on Informatics Engineering and Information Science; 2011; Berlin, Heidelberg; vol 252, 512–526
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 McNeil BJ, Elfrink VL, Bickford CJ. , et al. Nursing information technology knowledge, skills, and preparation of student nurses, nursing faculty, and clinicians: a U.S. survey. J Nurs Educ 2003; 42 (08) 341-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Kelley C, Lee B, Wilcox L. . (2017, May). Self-tracking for mental wellness: understanding expert perspectives and student experiences. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM: 629: 641; May 2017; Denver, Colorado
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Cochran W. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 99 Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112 (01) 155-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Chin W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research. 1998; 295 (02) 295-336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Hossain M, Prybutok V. Consumer acceptance of RFID technology: an exploratory study. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 2008; 55 (02) 316-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Product | SmartPLS. Smartpls.com. Available at: https://www.smartpls.com/ . Published 2019. Accessed July 1, 2019
    PubMed
  • 103 Deng Z, Hong Z, Ren C, Zhang W, Xiang F. What predicts patients' adoption intention toward mHealth services in China: empirical study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6 (08) e172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Armida E. Adoption Process for VOIP: the Influence of Trust in the UTAUT Model [Phd dissertation]. Indiana, United States: Purdue University; 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Sun Q, Cao H, You J. Factors influencing the adoption of mobile service in China: an integration of TAM. J Comput (Taipei) 2010; 5 (05) 799-806
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Hair J, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 2011; 19 (02) 139-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Alaiad A, Zhou L. The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83 (11) 825-840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Lam T, Maguire D. Structural equation modeling: theory and applications in forest management. Int J For Res 2012; 263953: 1687-9368
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Gefen D, Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: tutorial and annotated example. Comm Assoc Inform Syst 2005; 16: 5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Reinartz W, Haenlein M, Henseler J. An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. Int J Res Mark 2009; 26 (04) 332-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Gefen D, Rigdon E, Straub D. Editor's comments: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. Manage Inf Syst Q 2011; 35 (02) 3-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Fornell C, Bookstein FL. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J Mark Res 1982; 19 (04) 440-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Cassel C, Hackl P, Westlund A. Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures. J Appl Stat 1999; 26 (04) 435-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Cassel C, Hackl P, Westlund A. On measurement of intangible assets: a study of robustness of partial least squares. Total Qual Manage 2000; 11 (07) 897-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Kai-Uwe Brock J, Zhou Y. Organizational use of the internet. Internet Res 2005; 15 (01) 67-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Shiferaw K, Mehari E. Modeling predictors of acceptance and use of electronic medical record system in a resource limited setting: using modified UTAUT model. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2019 . Doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2019.100182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Casey T, Wilson-Evered E. Predicting uptake of technology innovations in online family dispute resolution services: an application and extension of the UTAUT. Comput Human Behav 2012; 28 (06) 2034-2045
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Celik H. Customer online shopping anxiety within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pac J Mark Log 2016; 28 (02) 278-307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Hsieh HL, Kuo YM, Wang SR, Chuang BK, Tsai CH. A study of personal health record user's behavioral model based on the PMT and UTAUT integrative perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016; 14 (01) E8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Chau P, Hu P. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. J Manage Inf Syst 2002; 18 (04) 191-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Chau P, Hu P. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf Manage 2002; 39 (04) 297-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black J. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 123 Gefen D, Straub D. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of E-Commerce adoption. J Assoc Inf Syst 2000; 1 (01) 1-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Nunnally C, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology), Vol 3. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 125 Duyck P, Pynoo B, Devolder P, Voet T, Adang L, Vercruysse J. User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system. Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in a radiological setting. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (02) 149-156
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Hennington A, Janz B. Information systems and healthcare XVI: physician adoption of electronic medical records: applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Comm Assoc Inform Syst 2007; 19: 60-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004; 31 (02) 143-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51 (06) 843-857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief Model. Health Educ Q 1988; 15 (02) 175-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Campbell K, Gordon L, Loeb M, Zhou L. The economic cost of publicly announced information security breaches: empirical evidence from the stock market. J Comput Secur 2003; 11 (03) 431-448
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Hsu C, Lin J. Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Inf Manage 2008; 45 (01) 65-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Samhan B. Patients' resistance towards health information technology: a perspective of the dual factor model of IT usage. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2017, Hawaii United States
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Cho H, Iribarren S, Schnall R. Technology-mediated interventions and quality of life for persons living with HIV/AIDS. a systematic review. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (02) 348-368
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Hoque MR, Bao Y, Sorwar G. Investigating factors influencing the adoption of e-Health in developing countries: a patient's perspective. Inform Health Soc Care 2017; 42 (01) 1-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Mbuagbaw L, Thabane L, Ongolo-Zogo P. , et al. The Cameroon Mobile Phone SMS (CAMPS) trial: a randomized trial of text messaging versus usual care for adherence to antiretroviral therapy. PLoS One 2012; 7 (12) e46909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Faiola A, Holden RJ. Consumer health informatics: empowering healthy-living-seekers through mHealth. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2017; 59 (05) 479-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, Green BB, Ginsburg AS. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Price M, Yuen EK, Goetter EM. , et al. mHealth: a mechanism to deliver more accessible, more effective mental health care. Clin Psychol Psychother 2014; 21 (05) 427-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Cho J. The impact of post-adoption beliefs on the continued use of health apps. Int J Med Inform 2016; 87: 75-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Cho J, Quinlan MM, Park D, Noh GY. Determinants of adoption of smartphone health apps among college students. Am J Health Behav 2014; 38 (06) 860-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Alsharo M, Alnsour Y, Al-Aiad A. Exploring the change of attitude among healthcare professionals toward adopting a national health information system: the case of Jordan. Int J Bus Inf Syst 2019 . Doi: 10.1504/IJBIS.2020.10019466
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (02) 115-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Jian WS, Syed-Abdul S, Sood SP. , et al. Factors influencing consumer adoption of USB-based Personal Health Records in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12 (01) 277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Yang S. Understanding undergraduate students' adoption of mobile learning model: a perspective of the extended UTAUT2. J Converg Inf Technol 2013; 8 (10) 969-979
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 145 Tavares J, Oliveira T. Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: an acceptance model and survey. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (03) e49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 146 Alsharo M, Alnsour Y, Alabdallah M. How habit affects continuous use: evidence from Jordan's national health information system. Inform Health Soc Care 2018 . Doi: 10.1080/17538157.2018.1540423
    PubMedGoogle Scholar