Patient and Physician Perceptions of the Impact of Electronic Health Records on the Patient–Physician RelationshipFunding None.
25 May 2019
26 July 2019
25 September 2019 (online)
Objectives Limited studies have been performed in South America to assess patient and physician perceptions of electronic health record (EHR) usage. We aim to study the perceptions of patients and physicians regarding the impact of EHRs on the patient–physician relationship.
Methods We use a survey instrument to assess the physician computer experience and opinions regarding EHR impact on various aspects of patient care. An additional survey is used to assess patient opinions related to their medical visit. Surveys are administered in two outpatient clinics in a private, academic health care network.
Results While a majority of physicians believed that EHRs have an overall positive impact on the quality of health care, many physicians had negative perceptions of the impact of EHRs on the patient–physician relationship. A majority of patients felt comfortable with their physician's use of the EHR and felt that their physician was able to maintain good personal contact while using the computer.
Conclusion Although physicians believe EHRs have a generally positive impact on the overall quality of care, the EHR's impact on the patient–physician relationship is still of concern. Patients do not perceive a negative interference from the EHR on the patient–physician relationship.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was approved by the medical ethics board of the medical faculty of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica. There was no risk for participants in the study, participant confidential information was stored in an encrypted database, and all participant identifiers were removed during data analysis.
- 1 Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium; 2000: 275-279
- 2 Fairley CK, Vodstrcil LA, Huffam S. , et al. Evaluation of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) at large urban primary care sexual health centre. PLoS One 2013; 8 (04) e60636
- 3 Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D. , et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (12) 2805-2816
- 4 World Health Organization. Chile: eHealth Country Profile. Published 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/atlas/2015/chl.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 . Accessed August 28, 2018
- 5 El-Kareh R, Gandhi TK, Poon EG. , et al. Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24 (04) 464-468
- 6 Sobral D, Rosenbaum M, Figueiredo-Braga M. Computer use in primary care and patient-physician communication. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98: 1568-1576
- 7 Marmor RA, Clay B, Millen M, Savides TJ, Longhurst CA. The impact of physician EHR usage on patient satisfaction. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (01) 11-14
- 8 Alkureishi MA, Lee WW, Lyons M. , et al. Impact of electronic medical record use on the patient-doctor relationship and communication: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31 (05) 548-560
- 9 Zurita L, Nøhr C. Patient opinion--EHR assessment from the users perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107 (Pt 2): 1333-1336
- 10 Rosen P, Spalding SJ, Hannon MJ, Boudreau RM, Kwoh CK. Parent satisfaction with the electronic medical record in an academic pediatric rheumatology practice. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13 (02) e40
- 11 Lelievre S, Schultz K. Does computer use in patient-physician encounters influence patient satisfaction?. Can Fam Physician 2010; 56 (01) e6-e12
- 12 Rethans J-J, Höppener P, Wolfs G, Diederiks J. Do personal computers make doctors less personal?. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988; 296 (6634): 1446-1448
- 13 Garrison GM, Bernard ME, Rasmussen NH. 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Fam Med 2002; 34 (05) 362-368
- 14 Buscató CR, Yuste NE, Toirán AS, Díaz SB, Font J. Opinión de profesionales y pacientes sobre la introducción de la informática en la consulta [Views of professionals and patients on the introduction of computer science into the consultation]. Aten Primaria 2005; 36: 194-197
- 15 Cork RD, Detmer WM, Friedman CP. Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5 (02) 164-176
- 16 Lin TC. A computer literacy scale for newly enrolled nursing college students: development and validation. J Nurs Res 2011; 19 (04) 305-317
- 17 The Drummond Group. ONC HIT Certification Program: Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification. Available at: https://drummondgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Test-Results-Summary-AlertEHR-v2.6.4-CompAmb-3Dec14.pdf . Accessed March 6, 2019
- 18 Emani S, Ting DY, Healey M. , et al. Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR: a cross-sectional study. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (03) 789-801
- 19 Grinspan ZM, Banerjee S, Kaushal R, Kern LM. Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records. Appl Clin Inform 2013; 4 (02) 225-240
- 20 O'Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown K, Shiffman RN. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (01) 43-49
- 21 Rathert C, Porter TH, Mittler JN, Fleig-Palmer M. Seven years after Meaningful Use: physicians' and nurses' experiences with electronic health records. Health Care Manage Rev 2019; 44 (01) 30-40
- 22 Jamoom EW, Heisey-Grove D, Yang N, Scanlon P. Physician opinions about EHR use by EHR experience and by whether the practice had optimized its EHR use. J Health Med Inform 2016; 7 (04) 1000240
- 23 Detmer WM, Friedman CP. Academic physicians' assessment of the effects of computers on health care. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994; 558-562
- 24 Electronic Medical Records in Latin America and the Caribbean. An Analysis of the Current Situation and Recommendations for the Region. Washington, DC: PAHO; 2016