Samantha Adams Festschrift: Sam Adams and the Social Construction of Technology and Health—Implications for Biomedical Informatics

Background

Clinical informatics, as an applied subdiscipline of biomedical informatics (BMI), must expertly use concepts from BMI core disciplines to design and deploy technologies to improve human health. The core disciplines include, among others, computer science, medicine, and social science. Applying social science concepts is perhaps the most challenging because issues related to people and organizations often have many interpretations, explanations, and solutions. Sam Adams, a social scientist who enjoyed engaging the most complex theoretical domains, made valuable contributions to thorny social problems at the intersection of technology and people. In this article, we argue that her work and the theoretical topics she chose for emphasis should be more widely consumed by practitioners in clinical informatics. As an example, we focus on social constructionism, one general theoretical topic she favored. Sam used social constructionism to explore domains relevant to today's practicing clinical informaticist, including cybersecurity and social media.

• References

• 1 Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T. , et al. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2012
• 2 Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2000
• 3 Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care--an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (05) 542-549
• 4 Aarts J, Adams S, Kaplan B. , et al. Protecting Patient Privacy in Cyber Environments. Chicago: American Medical Informatics Association; 2016
• 5 Niezen M, van Woensel D, Nunez D. , et al. D: A4. 1 Socio-economic impact assessment. TILT, Tilburg University; 2016
• 6 Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts. Int J Hum Comput Stud 1993; 38: 475-487
• 7 Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press; 1995
• 8 Adams SA, Petersen C. Precision medicine: opportunities, possibilities, and challenges for patients and providers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (04) 787-790
• 9 Adams S, Purtova N, Leenes R. Under Observation: The Interplay Between eHealth and Surveillance. Springer; 2017
• 10 Adams S. Ubiquitous Digital Devices and Health: Reflections on Foucault's Notion of the “Clinic.” In: Under Observation: The Interplay Between eHealth and Surveillance. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017: 165-176
• 11 Foucault M. Discipline and punish. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: N Y Pantheon; 1977. ;139: 1992
• 12 Foucault M. The Birth of the Clinic (translated by A.M. Sheridan). London: Tavistock; 1973
• 13 Adams SA. Maintaining the collision of accounts: crowdsourcing sites in health care as brokers in the co-production of pharmaceutical knowledge. Inf Commun Soc 2014; 17: 657-669
• 14 Adams SA. Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: The reflexive patient and “share-your-experience” websites. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72 (07) 1069-1076
• 15 Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005
• 16 Wathen N, Wyatt S, Harris R. Mediating Health Information: The Go-Betweens in a Changing Socio-Technical Landscape. New York: Springer; 2008
• 17 Adams S, Niezen M. Digital “solutions” to unhealthy lifestyle “problems”: the construction of social and personal risks in the development of eCoaches. Health Risk Soc 2016; 17: 530-546
• 18 Adams S. Use of Social Media by Hospitals and Health Authorities. In: Syed-Abdul S, Gabarron E, Lau AYS. , eds., Participatory Health Through Social Media. London: Academic Press; 2016: 27-41
• 19 Unertl KM, Schaefbauer CL, Campbell TR, Senteio C, Siek KA, Bakken S, Veinot TC. Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (01) 60-73
• 20 Kanstrup AM, Bygholm A, Bertelsen P. Participatory Design & Health Information Technology. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2017
• 21 Greenhalgh T, Stones R. Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70 (09) 1285-1294
• 22 Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64 (01) 39-56
• 23 Ravvaz K, Kuziemsky C, Koppel R. , et al. AMIA members' “vital signs”: what the HIT implementation listserv says about goals for AMIA and for medical informatics. American Medical Informatics Association; 2015: 1067
• 24 Forsythe D. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2001
• 25 Pratt W, Reddy MC, McDonald DW, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Gennari JH. Incorporating ideas from computer-supported cooperative work. J Biomed Inform 2004; 37 (02) 128-137